Folks, there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch and every gimmick has a catch. Whether or not you agree with the thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies and researchers that conclude wireless is harmful, the privacy aspect of city wide WiFi is a whole other issue.
On March 5th, 2013, we launched this website to end the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known. Millions and millions and millions of hits spanning the globe and all levels of the power structure on the planet indicate that we have struck a nerve. What do we get for our birthday? http://fsd.k12.ca.us/index.html
HERE IS OUR OPINION OF THEIR PROPAGANDA AND OUR SATIRICALLY SERIOUS VERSION AS SEEN THROUGH THE DONNING OF THE “THEY LIVE” GLASSES.
Launching of the District’s 1:1 Visible Irradiaton Program (VIP)
Inspiring learners to leverage the arts and innovative technology to create, collaborate, communicate, critically think, and contribute as part of a global community.
Requiring parents to expose their learners while leveraging their own tax money for potentially dangerous wireless technology. What will it create? With whom will the data collaborate and communicate? common core privacy concerns. Will they really critically think as their screen time takes hold instead of them contributing to their local community. Global citizens huh? You don’t say.
Happy Birthday to the Fullerton Informer which began on March 5, 2013, our mission where we are trying to save every student in the FSD from being provided with an microwave transmitter headed straight for their laps and a router hanging over their heads. Pletka demands that iPads which have NO ETHERNET ports be utilized-excerpt from letter dated 10-3-13
“Since the use of iPads already occurs during about 90 percent of classroom time at the fifth grade level, your request to remove ________ from class anytime iPads are in use would be educationally detrimental to him and is respectfully denied.” Robert Pletka.
In order to ensure that our students are being exposed to the maximum amount of pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation all while using our children to make rich, it appears that the purveyors of this irrelevant technology desire to impair their learning. Harvard trained pediatric neurologist Dr. Martha Herbert’s take on wireless . This program aims to provide young students with 21st Century student specific skills like looking up answers, using a calculator, watching and playing video games like minecraft, full of content knowledge, and three dimensional thinking illiteracy that will help them be mastered by the technocracy’s multi-dimensional ability to subject its users to an involuntary radiation experiment required in the 21st Century classroom and beyond. http://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/
There you have it right in front of your eyes ladies and gentlemen. Looks like the iPad has X’d out your children’s offspring. As if the X box didn’t have that one under lock and key already with the wireless controller in the lap and the transmitter that never sleeps. video game addiction defined
The three dimensional world is no match for highly addictive screens. Next stop, the optometrist.
Brought to you by : The occupants of the empty black chairs
Now now children, you must comply and irradiate. We are watching you so we can get the most out of all of you. robert-pletka-recognizing-voltage-potential/
X marks the spot. Girls are born with their eggs. What is this high frequency pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation transmitter doing to the longest lived and most important cells in their bodies as it remains there for hours a day at school and at home every day? what-is-wifi-doing-to-your-daughters
The look of love as this agent of the state complies with the top down mandatory wireless exposure edict from above. She should remember this one as I handed one to her last year: http://thefullertoninformer.com/is-this-your-child/
Notice the podium where I have spoken repeatedly for this to be stopped pushed aside, flanked by the images of those who could still stop this but choose to ignore the other side of this story.
Someone made a nice commission off of this one. Just think of lead flux oozing from the drinking fountains, the empty toilet paper dispensers, the hand dryers’ 10 year old unchanged filters, the rocky road asphalt, the 35 kids crammed into the electronic sardine cans, the furlough days, and the improper spectrum lighting that all the dough spent on these soon to be outdated toys could have repaired, filled, replaced, slurry coated, alleviated, ended or installed.
This photo also appeared on Pletka’s Facebook page a few months ago. Are they telling us something here?
Ladies and gentlemen, the agenda marches on and so do we. Happy 1 year anniversary from all of us at The Fullerton Informer and thanks for stopping by.
His death was a tragic, untimely loss, seemingly without reason. The hope of many is that this field of dreams in our home town will offer the next generation what may seem impossible: a chance at the big league and the big time. My sincere hope in this article is, maybe in his memory, I can expose what I believe has stolen the best years of Gary’s and many other ballplayers’ lives. That is what I will attempt to explore and assert. The cruel twists and turns of this arduous life don’t make sense at times, especially when it seems the good die young and the impetuous inherit the earth. I never had the pleasure of personally meeting Mr. Gary Carter, but his reputation preceded him. His career in the major leagues spanned decades and his philanthropy will span even more. He was known as “Kid” for his ebullient demeanor. He was known to all as number 8 on the field, to some as dad, to some as one of a kind to many more, he will be forever remembered as Gary Carter, one of baseball’s great players.
On Saturday, Febuary 21st, field two at the Fullerton Sports complex will be dedicated and officially named Gary Carter field.
One of my sons is a catcher and wore number 8 for several years. My older son will be playing in the tribute game being held in Mr. Carter’s honor, ironically here, just a few miles to the east of where Gary used to play in his younger years in the empty fields on the corner of Rosecrans and Sunny Ridge drive. Today there you can find a 20+ acre golf course which is meticulously landscaped and cared for which is now known as the McColl superfund site.
Gary attended Sunny Hills High School and would eventually write his own ticket because of his athletic gifts. He had what it took to make the big leagues and that he did. In 1972 he signed with the Expos. Life would never be the same. Gary was drafted as a shortstop but several years later he would permanently change positions to catcher. He would spend the better part of the next 20 years behind home plate. This would be the “kid’s” new home. Throughout his remarkable career, Gary Carter caught more major league games than all but three players in baseball history. Some would estimate that Gary Carter caught upwards of three to four hundred thousand pitches behind home plate.
Gary Carter eventually developed a very aggressive form of terminal cancer in his brain that led to his tragic, untimely death. The type of cancer is known as glioblastoma. Brain cancer seems to be increasingly prevalent in our society and even more so in some sports. Baseball, in particular seems to be the sport where the tumors are becoming the most prevalent. You would initially suspect that head trauma would be responsible and that contact sports like hockey or football would lead the way statistically. Oddly enough, that is not the case. Baseball players like catchers and pitchers seem to be the ones plagued by this dreaded disease.
Cancer is a disease whose causes can vary just a widely as the different forms and is very difficult to prove what specifically is responsible. With respect to the big leagues, the experts are baffled as to causation but in agreement that there is indeed a strange correlation to baseball. Time magazine had a piece a few years back on it:
There are many baseball players that spend time behind home plate and on the mound. and they live long healthy lives. However there is definitely an inordinate amount that do not. I believe there are reasons that he and other players met the same fate and succumb to this disease and while many who spend their lives out on that field do not.’
I would like to explore what I believe to be the common denominator and and cause of what is being observed. I believe there is a logical explanation for we are witnessing.
Gary Carter was a catcher. He had tumors that resembled a snake wrapped around the back of his brain. Let us look at some of baseballs other players that suffered a similar fate.
Dan Quisenberry was a right handed pitcher who developed brain cancer on his left temporal lobe.
Bobby Bonds, the father of Barry Bonds, was an outfielder. He developed a brain tumor and lung cancer.
One of the more notable anomalies in baseball’s bizarre brain tumor incidence is what went on with The Phillys at veterans stadium.
Five players, Tug McGraw, John Vukovich, Johnny Oates, Ken Brett and Darren Daulton all had brain tumors.
Tug Mcgraw was a pitcher. The location of his tumor was located on his left temporal lobe.
John Vukovich was an infielder spending most of his career at 3rd base.
Johnny Oates was a catcher. His tumor was in the back of his head in the brain stem.
Ken Brett was a pitcher. His tumor was on his frontal lobe.
Darren Daulton is a catcher. He has a brain tumor.
Ricky Stone is a pitcher. He developed a malignant brain tumor.
Bobby Mercer was a center fielder and a broadcaster and his tumor was on his right frontal lobe.
Giants pitcher Dave Dravecky, 32, had a cancerous tumor on his left arm.
Lets look at some umpires. Although they rotate their positions on the field, they spend plenty of time behind the plate.
Orioles long-time umpires attendant Ernie Tyler, who has worked 51 consecutive Opening Days including 3,819 consecutive home games in Baltimore, was diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Longtime big league home plate umpire Harry Wendelstedt had a career that spanned from 1966-98 and was diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Frank Dezelan, a major league home plate umpire, umpired for 10 years in the minor leagues and then in the major leagues from 1966-1971. Surgery to remove a brain tumor ended his career when he was 42.
Lanny Harris was a home plate umpire in the National League for 7 full seasons, from 1979 to 1985. In 1985, he was diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumor, and given six months to live.
Todd Felis walked away from a coordinator position with Big League Dreams to return to umpiring logging 5000 games. He was diagnosed with a brain tumor.
MLB’s Executive Director Michael Weiner has also been diagnosed with a brain tumor.
What is striking is the majority of the aforementioned individuals is that most are in the direct trajectory of the ball when it is being pitched. Why do the brain tumors seem to plague pitchers and catchers? Why that particular group of individuals?
The anomaly at Veterans stadium in Philadelphia brings no less than five players to oncology wards. The brain cancer rate was 3 to 4 times what the average should have been and four out of the fiver were either pitchers or catchers. Was it the synthetic turf that they played on? Was it the proximity to the South Philadelphia refineries? Was it due to the stadium being built on a dump? If so what about all of the other players on the field besides the pitcher and catcher? Why are they not seemingly affected? What about the grounds crew, season ticket holders or anyone else that worked for years in, on and around the astro turf? Considering that the odds in a normal environment of contracting brain cancer is about 1 in 8,000 and that there were only a couple of hundred Phillies who played during the last 30 years, the question should be raised concerning possible public health risks from the facility.
Let us first look at Astro Turf. According to the U.S. Patent Office, Astro Turf is composed of many ingredients including polyvinyl chloride which is a plastic that when exposed to temperatures of 86 degrees or more breaks down into a dioxin. In addittion, studies have concluded that artificial turf contains dangerous toxins like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead including the lead chromate pigment. http://today.uchc.edu/headlines/2007/nov07/toxins.html
UV degradation along with the elements aid in the decomposition of polyvinyl chloride compounds and release their contents into their environment. Rub your fingers along a white pvc pipe in your yard that has been exposed to the elements and look at the white powder that will stick to your hand. The same pipe will not do that on the shelf at the hardware store.
What about the refinery pollution or the jets landing over the stadium? Why does it appear that the pitchers and catchers are the only ones affected? What about all of the other players from other teams that played on the field throughout the seasons? Once more, why are they not affected? Good question.
What did Gary Carter have in common with the five players from the Phillies who came down with brain tumors?
One of the fields where Gary Carter used to play in his youth was later determined to be a superfund site called the McColl site in Fullerton California. From 1942 to 1946, this location served as a dump for the petroleum industry. The principal contaminants of concern (COC) are: benzene, tetrahydrothiophenes (THTs), and metals. EPA McColl site info. When dumping operations ceased, it subsequently became an empty field. Like many children are naturally inclined to do to this very day, they play in empty fields. Gary, along with hundreds of children over the next 50 years, played in those fields, breathing the air, inhaling the metallic laden dust and the airborne organic compounds. The older kids on my block used to ride up there to dirt bike, play in those fields and even go shooting up in the Coyote Hills. So what about all of the kids that used to play in the fields up there off of Rosecrans? I grew up with some of them. Why are they not all sick?
Like the five Phillies, Gary was exposed to and ingested carcinogens. Gary breathed his from the dust and physical contact with the soil. So did the neighborhood kids. The five Phillies spent an inordinate amount of time on the Astro Turf breathing and coming into contact with carcinogens as well but so did countless others. The players used their cell phones, lived on an on the road diet at times and were frequently subjected to a lack of sleep on the road trips. So were all the other players?
So what is different about these individuals?
Why were they possibly susceptible to a greater extent than their counterparts to these carcinogens and external factors off of the field if indeed they were responsible? What did Gary Carter and these others have in common?
All professional Baseball players have it rough. There is no doubt about it. I have known at least one personally and all the way from his farm team days to the big time under the bright lights, it has been an incredibly trying time both physically and emotionally. Long hours away from home and family are just one of the hallmarks of baseball’s commitments. All baseball players use cellphones to fill the long hours hours away from home. So why are the GBM’s are on the rise in just the pitchers, and catchers . It is no coincidence that this is the area of the brain closest to which the cell phone is held. Baseball players (even retired) probably use their cell phones often as they are on the road often. So why don’t we see the left or right fielders, coaches, or first basemen inordinately coming down with brain tumors on a similar basis?
A lot goes on behind the plate as that is where all the action is. There are a lot of eyes and ears 30 feet back in the stands. What most people don’t realize is that part of the action behind the plate and elsewhere involves radar. The radar is aimed at the pitcher from behind home plate and at times, in center field aimed at the catchers to get the velocities off of the bat. It is used on almost every ball that is pitched and caught, whether it be at practice, spring training or during regular season, a radar gun is in operation aimed directly at the pitcher. The catcher is also smack dab in the middle of the radar beam. Gary Carter was no exception. He was in the radar gun’s line of fire almost all of the time. For that matter, so are most catchers, pitchers and even umpires. So why then, do not all pitchers, catchers and umpires get brain tumors?
Let’s talk about radar. Radar employs microwave technology to determine the velocity of the ball as it travels to home plate from the pitcher’s mound. It emits a precisely focused, directional beam of electromagnetic radiation that travels right through the catcher, umpire and to the pitcher. Just how many radar guns were in use at each respective game is anyone’s guess. The frequency of the radiation these devices operate on is similar to the microwave oven in your home, which is around 2.4 GHz. This is also the same frequency that your WiFi and WiFi enabled wireless devices, including some cordless and cellular phones operate on as well. This particular frequency has been shown to make the blood brain barrier permeable to toxins and metals.
I believe this unique combination of cause and effect is why Gary and these individuals fell victim to this tragedy and many others, although exposed to the toxins, were not exposed to the radar failed to develop tumors. Those exposed to the radar that were not exposed to the toxins failed to develop tumors as well. I believe that both are required for the brain tumors to form and this explains what we are observing.
Below is an excerpt from Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D. Director, Center for Family and Community Health School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley that confirms what low intensity microwaves do to the blood brain barrier:
“Since exposure to low intensity microwave radiation can open the blood-brain barrier, toxic chemical exposure may be more harmful to anyone who is exposed to wireless radiation. For example, see http://bit.ly/14HDUpZ.]”
‘Putting the next generation of brains in danger’
Saundra Young, CNN, Feb 14, 2014
The number of chemicals known to be toxic to children’s developing brains has doubled over the last seven years, researchers said.
Dr. Philip Landrigan at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York and Dr. Philippe Grandjean from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, authors of the review published Friday in The Lancet Neurology journal, say the news is so troubling they are calling for a worldwide overhaul of the regulatory process in order to protect children’s brains.
“We know from clinical information on poisoned adult patients that these chemicals can enter the brain through the blood brain barrier and cause neurological symptoms,” said Grandjean.
“When this happens in children or during pregnancy, those chemicals are extremely toxic, because we now know that the developing brain is a uniquely vulnerable organ. Also, the effects are permanent.”
The two have been studying industrial chemicals for about 30 years. In 2006, they published data identifying five chemicals as neurotoxicants — substances that impact brain development and can cause a number of neurodevelopmental disabilities including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, dyslexia and other cognitive damage, they said.
Those five are lead, methylmercury, arsenic, polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, and toluene.
Banned in the United States in 1979, PCBs were used in hundreds of products including paint, plastic, rubber products and dyes. Toluene is in household products like paint thinners, detergents, nail polish, spot removers and antifreeze.
Now, after further review, six more chemicals have been added to the list: manganese; fluoride; tetrachloroethylene, a solvent; a class of chemicals called polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or flame retardants; and two pesticides, chlorpyrifos, which is widely used in agriculture, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethan
“The continuing research has identified six new chemicals that are toxic to the developing human brain,” said Landrigan. “We’re turning up chemicals at the rate of about one a year that we’re discovering are capable of damaging the developing brain of a human fetus or human infant.”
To examine fluoride, which is in tap water in many areas, Landrigan and Grandjean looked at an analysis of 27 studies of children, mostly in China, who were exposed to fluoride in drinking water at high concentrations. The data, they said, suggests a decline on average of about seven IQ points.
There’s another big concern: “We are very worried that there are a number of other chemicals out there in consumer products that we all contact every day that have the potential to damage the developing brain, but have never been safety tested,” Landrigan said.
“Over the last six or seven years we are actually adding brain toxic chemicals at a greater speed than we are adding toxicity evidence in children’s brains,” Grandjean said.
“At least 1,000 chemicals using lab animals have shown that they somehow interfere with brain function in rodents — rats and mice — and those are prime candidates for regulatory control to protect human developing brains. But this testing has not been done systematically.”
At greatest risk? Pregnant women and small children, according to Grandjean. According to the review, the biggest window of vulnerability occurs in utero, during infancy and early childhood.
The impact is not limited to loss of IQ points.
“Beyond IQ, we’re talking about behavior problems — shortening of attention span, increased risk of ADHD,” Landrigan said.
“We’re talking about emotion problems, less impulse control, (being) more likely to make bad decisions, get into trouble, be dyslexic and drop out of school. … These are problems that are established early, but travel through childhood, adolescence, even into adult life.”
It’s not just children: All these compounds are toxic to adults, too. In fact, in 2006 the pair documented 201 chemicals toxic to the adult nervous system, usually stemming from occupational exposures, poisonings and suicide attempts.
The American Chemistry Council, meanwhile, called the review a “rehash” of the authors’ first review.
“This iteration is as highly flawed as the first, as once again the authors ignore the fundamental scientific principles of exposure and potency,” said council spokesman Scott Jensen.
“What is most concerning is that the authors focus largely on chemicals and heavy metals that are well understood to be inappropriate for children’s exposure, are highly regulated and/or are restricted or being phased out. They then extrapolate that similar conclusions should be applied to chemicals that are more widely used in consumer products without evidence to support their claims. Such assertions do nothing to advance true scientific understanding and only create confusion and alarm.”
Landrigan and Grandjean now say all untested chemicals in use and all new chemicals should be tested for developmental neurotoxicity.
This is not a new concept. In 2007, the European Union adopted regulations known as REACH – Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals – to protect human health from risks posed by chemicals. REACH covers all chemicals, placing the burden of proof on companies to prove that any chemicals they make are safe.
“We are behind right now and we’re falling further behind,” Landrigan said. “… I find it very irritating some of the multinational manufacturers are now marketing products in Europe and the U.S. with the same brand name and same label, but in Europe (they) are free of toxic chemicals and in the U.S. they contain toxic chemicals.”
The best example of this, he said, is cosmetics and phthalates. Phthalates are a group of chemicals used in hundreds of products from cosmetics, perfume, hair spray, soap and shampoos to plastic and vinyl toys, shower curtains, miniblinds, food containers and plastic wrap.
You can also find them in plastic plumbing pipes, medical tubing and fluid bags, vinyl flooring and other building materials. They are used to soften and increase the flexibility of plastic and vinyl.
In Europe, cosmetics don’t contain phthalates, but here in the United States some do.
Phthalates previously were used in pacifiers, soft rattles and teethers. But in 1999, after a push from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, American companies stopped using them in those products.
“We certainly have the capability, it’s a matter of political will,” Landrigan said. “We have tried in this country over the last decade to pass chemical safety legislation but the chemical industry and their supporters have successfully beat back the effort.”
However, the Food and Drug Administration said two of the most common phthalates, — dibutylphthalate, or DBP, used as a plasticizer in products such as nail polishes to reduce cracking by making them less brittle, and dimethylphthalate, or DMP used in hairsprays — are now rarely used in this country.
Diethylphthalate, or DEP, used in fragrances, is the only phthalate still used in cosmetics, the FDA said.
“It’s not clear what effect, if any, phthalates have on human health,” according to the FDA’s website. “An expert panel convened from 1998 to 2000 by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), part of the National Institute for Environmental Safety and Health, concluded that reproductive risks from exposure to phthalates were minimal to negligible in most cases.”
But Grandjean is unfazed.
“We know enough about this to say we need to put a special emphasis on protecting developing brains. We are not just talking about single chemicals anymore. We are talking about chemicals in general.”
“This does not necessarily mean restrict the use of all chemicals, but it means that they need to be tested whether they are toxic to brain cells or not,” he said.
“We have the test methods and protocols to determine if chemicals are toxic to brain cells. If we look at this globally, we are looking at more than a generation of children — a very high proportion of today’s children have been exposed to lead, mercury and other substances, including substances that have not yet been tested but are suspect of being toxic to brain development.”
The Environmental Working Group is an environmental health research organization that specializes in toxic chemical analysis and has long called for reforms. In 2004, the group tested 10 samples of umbilical cord blood for hundreds of industrial pollutants and found an average of 200 in each sample.
“Here in the U.S., the federal law put in place to ostensibly protect adults and children from exposures to dangerous chemicals, including those that can present serious risks to the brain and nervous systems, has been an abject failure,” said Environmental Working Group spokesman Alex Formuzis.
“The 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act has instead been largely responsible for the pollution in people beginning in the womb, where hundreds of industrial contaminants literally bathe the developing fetus.”
Landrigan is recruiting pregnant women for a new study that will test for chemical exposures. He said it’s inevitable that over the next few years more chemicals will be added to the list.
His concern? “The ability to detect these chemicals lags behind the chemical industries’ ability to develop new chemicals and put them into consumer products. That’s why we need new legislation in this country to close that gap.”
“We are lagging behind,” Grandjean said. “And we are putting the next generation of brains in danger.”
Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
Director, Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
There are many studies and research papers that confirm that microwaves allow toxins to get into the brain that would under normal circumstances, not be able to enter:
Colorado Rockies scout Chris Forbes came down with two brain tumors.
Tom Pratt was the 12-year pitching coach for the MLB’s Chicago Cubs and has a brain tumor.
Michael Weiner, the executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association died of brain cancer. I believe it was probably due to his cell phone use.
Gliomas (brain cancers) have been linked to wireless exposure.
As a matter of fact, the Italian supreme court ruled that microwave radiation from cell phones did in fact cause tumors. Remember that radar guns emit microwave radiation.
How about other sports like tennis that use radar?
So how many tennis players are getting brain tumors?
Tim Gullikson, the uncommon tennis player who never made an enemy and who became the coach of the best player in the world, died of the brain cancer he had been fighting for nearly 18 months at the age of 44.
Helen Kelesi had a brain tumor.
James Broach had just become the first and only Trinity men’s tennis player to win a national championship in singles and doubles. He died after a three-year battle with brain cancer. He was 37
Renee Simpson died of brain cancer at age 47.
Todd Witsken was a three-time All-American at USC and died of brain cancer at age 34
Leander Paes, one of the world’s best doubles tennis players, was treated for a brain lesion that turned out to be a parasitic brain infection.
Alice Reen, is a professional tennis player and a two-time brain tumor survivor.
Stephen Bell, a champion tennis player died of a brain tumor at the age of 38.
Chuck McKinley was clearly among the most charismatic players of the early 1960s. He passed away far too young at 45 of a brain tumor.
I believe that so many are dead or dying from wireless microwave radiation this and yet government and the industry is trying to hide it from the public. How could major league baseball or the tennis associations not even mention any of this anywhere? Has no one ever put these pieces together?
Radar guns emit wireless microwave radiation. Wireless microwave radiation has been determined to be a class 2B carcinogen by the World Health Organization. list of class 2B carcinogens begins on page 9
Some scientists believe if accurately assessed today, wireless microwave radiation would be listed as a class 1 carcinogen. Dr Hardell of the World Health Organization EMF Working Group, now states radio frequency radiation meets criteria for a group 1 carcinogen and that “Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised”. http://lennarthardellenglish.
Think of the tremendous industry influence over the scientific community and government regulators.
The FCC exposure guidelines for wireless radiation only take into consideration acute burning of tissue and ignore all non thermal biological effects that are found at much lower exposure levels. There is much debate over this particular issue. For example:
Cell phones, WiFi routers, wireless TVs, dvr’s, blue tooth devices,iPads, tablets, laptops, security systems, printers, and any other wireless device emits this carcinogen. Depending on how toxic of an environment you live in, will determine how synergistically the radiation with work with the poisons around you and your children to produce disease.
I believe that Gary Carter and many others would possibly still be alive today if those we entrust with our safety and our very lives at times would stand up and face head on what has spent the better part of the last 35 years behind home plate. It sadly has now managed to enter our homes, schools and workplaces, and in some cases, without even our knowledge or consent.
Major league baseball as well as all sports need to act on this and end this needless tragedy of some of our finest men and women who tirelessly give of themselves for the game.
There is nothing more precious than to see the sun shine forever in a child’s eyes. Their excitement of being in the stands of a big league game or simply playing on the little league field is priceless. We all know that without the children there is no tomorrow for any aspect of our society. How much longer will we have to tolerate the silence on the wireless microwave radiation dangers especially to our children?
I would like to show you a photo of what I believe to be the biggest threat of all to our children. It is taking place in the classrooms and maybe even at home. This is a photo of a child, not with a radar gun in his lap, but something similar. It is a microwave transmitter.
The Fullerton Informer shared from:
The wireless antenna is right on his zipper. Need I say more?
What is all this wireless doing to the unborn? Are the same mechanisms at work in Autism involving metals and microwave radiation?
You see, my son will be playing on that field tomorrow in honor of Gary Carter. Ironically my other son is number 8 on his little league team and my oldest will be wearing the “kid” shirt tomorrow at the game. My hope for my sons is that they will have a “kid” of their own someday and with any luck more than just one. Sadly I believe that what is taking place right before our very eyes may make that reality a mere impossibility some day.
When my father died of cancer some 12 years ago, I availed myself to warn others of the mistakes he made in the hopes of many others gaining insight into what may not be evident to the unsuspecting.
While what has happened to Gary Carter and those that have gone before him cannot be changed, what can be gained is insight into what needs to change so that others don’t have to go down that road. Ladies and gentlemen, wireless radiation is not harmless, the trillion dollar wireless industry is not your friend and if you think the government is going to protect you, you have another thing coming. The dangers of microwave radiation have been known for the last 50 years and are still being actively suppressed to this day.
I am sure that if the players that gave their all to the fans that meant it all to them were here today and know what is now evident, they would want you to act in a way consistent with the values they collectively embodied as a team. The need to be strong, courageous, brave and to persevere in spite of at times, insurmountable odds, and to act in a way that was fair, kind, and loving towards those who are the most vulnerable would be the best tribute to Gary Carter and the others that any of us could ever make.
Do it for the “kid” and for all the “kids”. Help us end the largest radiation experiment that the world has ever known that is currently being conducted on all players in this game of life, including our children so that the “kids” may live to display Gary Carter’s once youthful exuberance in perpetuity and have “kids” of their own someday. I am sure he would have wanted it that way.
Jan Weiner speaks
I guess it is a good living making money off of the Autism epidemic and the special education explosion while breathing exhaust fumes next to the 57 freeway.
Meet Jan Weiner
Looks like out of all of those in key positions that were in receipt of this email http://thefullertoninformer.com/the-fullerton-five-part-2-for-the-health-of-our-children-can-reason-prevail/, this one was the first to step right up to the microphone. Here is just a little background on her right here - http://ed.fullerton.edu/sped/faculty/jan-s-weiner-ph-d/.
Research Interests: Full Inclusion of Individuals with Moderate/Severe Disabilities (Birth to Death); Adult Transition; Positive Behavior Support (Individual and School-Wide), Single Subject Research Design
- Ph. D., Education University of California, Santa Barbara
- M.A., Education Administration
- Ed.M., with distinction, Special Education, Boston University
- B.A., cum laude, Psychology, Northeastern University & University of Massachusetts
It sure looks to me like another Psychology major with an Education degree defending irradiating children. Such an eerily familiar ring to Pletka and his cadre of followers (school principals) in the FSD.
I am still waiting for the C.S.F. physics department to jump into the basket. Michelle Garden said they don’t agree with us either:
Why does it seem that it is always the taxpayer funded, establishment on the teat types, who are always the ones stepping on the gas pedal to the common core’s microwave matrix, wireless radiation chambers’ classroom finish line for our kids? I just don’t get it.
Yeah, yeah, sure, sure, the Autism epidemic has nothing to do with wireless or vaccines. Prevention? What the heck is prevention? The solution seems to be simply more vaccines, petrochemical poison pharmaceuticals and more wireless. It is a brilliant business model but in my opinion, a very immoral one.
The solution is not just simply more vaccines, drugs and more wireless. The solution is to stop doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results. That is the definition of insanity. A paltry salary with a pension down the line can turn into some real blinders if it befalls the right individuals. How can so many who are ostensibly so well educated be so complicit in the greatest threat that humanity has ever faced? How can people continue on with the blinders as the special ed budgets explode while the Autism rates head straight into orbit? Is job security, fake fair weather friends, reputation and fleeting prestige really worth it?
Gotta tow the line so they can eat their bacon in Europe and go wine tasting in the summer. Break rank and its all out the window. Yes but the the onslaught of wireless technologies in the form of microwave towers, satellites showering the planet with radiation, Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) ports, Wireless Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) antennas — plus all the gadgets they make possible: , tablets, dect phones, pagers, Blackberries, cell phones, roving laptops, wireless electric and water meters, satellite TV and radio, in-flight internet are totally safe as the vampires run the blood bank at the FCC. I am referring as well to the electromagnetic weapons, radiation-emitting stations, surveillance instruments, and crowd-control devices military and law enforcement deploy, the rf modules, the microwave ovens, the wireless cameras, baby monitors and of course the extra special mandatory exposure wireless classrooms in the Fullerton School District. But have these always been with us? Have the battery of the 50+ metallic nano tech laden injections which are touted for the greater good? Yeah, and meanwhile the term public health has truly become an oxymoron as a result of all this willful ignorance in the year of the cat. I digress. There are thousands of studies, scientists, accompanied by millions of brain damaged kids and all we get from the community to address this is a special ed teacher? Come on gang.
Come to think of it, the trillion dollar wireless industry, the lobbyists on the hills, the out of control federal government,the educrat lackeys counting the dollar signs in the CAFR’s, the tech companies’ infestation of the CalPers, the immoral desire to not rock the boat to the detriment of others and the clandestine agenda to affect human fertility all have nothing to do with the price of tea in China now do they?
Right out of the gate, the quack job theme of junk science rises to the surface. Never you mind that she appears to ignore thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies and exchanges it for this. WELL ANYWAY, HERE IS WHAT SHE WROTE which appears to be nothing more than cut and paste RF industry info possibly from Lorne Trottier’s shill cut and paste site promoted by ROMAN SCHULZE.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Weiner, Jan <email@example.com.
Here is more updated data to add to your information:
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
“Considering the very low exposure levels and research results collected to date, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects.”
Quackwatch lists the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) as a questionable organization, and its certifying board, the American Board of Environmental Medicine as a dubious certifying board. They are not recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties.
Electromagnetic fields and public health
Base stations and wireless technologies
Mobile telephony is now commonplace around the world. This wireless technology relies upon an extensive network of fixed antennas, or base stations, relaying information with radiofrequency (RF) signals. Over 1.4 million base stations exist worldwide and the number is increasing significantly with the introduction of third generation technology.
Other wireless networks that allow high-speed internet access and services, such as wireless local area networks (WLANs), are also increasingly common in homes, offices, and many public areas (airports, schools, residential and urban areas). As the number of base stations and local wireless networks increases, so does the RF exposure of the population. Recent surveys have shown that the RF exposures from base stations range from 0.002% to 2% of the levels of international exposure guidelines, depending on a variety of factors such as the proximity to the antenna and the surrounding environment. This is lower or comparable to RF exposures from radio or television broadcast transmitters.
There has been concern about possible health consequences from exposure to the RF fields produced by wireless technologies. This fact sheet reviews the scientific evidence on the health effects from continuous low-level human exposure to base stations and other local wireless networks.
A common concern about base station and local wireless network antennas relates to the possible long-term health effects that whole-body exposure to the RF signals may have. To date, the only health effect from RF fields identified in scientific reviews has been related to an increase in body temperature (> 1 °C) from exposure at very high field intensity found only in certain industrial facilities, such as RF heaters. The levels of RF exposure from base stations and wireless networks are so low that the temperature increases are insignificant and do not affect human health.
The strength of RF fields is greatest at its source, and diminishes quickly with distance. Access near base station antennas is restricted where RF signals may exceed international exposure limits. Recent surveys have indicated that RF exposures from base stations and wireless technologies in publicly accessible areas (including schools and hospitals) are normally thousands of times below international standards.
In fact, due to their lower frequency, at similar RF exposure levels, the body absorbs up to five times more of the signal from FM radio and television than from base stations. This is because the frequencies used in FM radio (around 100 MHz) and in TV broadcasting (around 300 to 400 MHz) are lower than those employed in mobile telephony (900 MHz and 1800 MHz) and because a person’s height makes the body an efficient receiving antenna. Further, radio and television broadcast stations have been in operation for the past 50 or more years without any adverse health consequence being established.
While most radio technologies have used analog signals, modern wireless telecommunications are using digital transmissions. Detailed reviews conducted so far have not revealed any hazard specific to different RF modulations.
Cancer: Media or anecdotal reports of cancer clusters around mobile phone base stations have heightened public concern. It should be noted that geographically, cancers are unevenly distributed among any population. Given the widespread presence of base stations in the environment, it is expected that possible cancer clusters will occur near base stations merely by chance. Moreover, the reported cancers in these clusters are often a collection of different types of cancer with no common characteristics and hence unlikely to have a common cause.
Scientific evidence on the distribution of cancer in the population can be obtained through carefully planned and executed epidemiological studies. Over the past 15 years, studies examining a potential relationship between RF transmitters and cancer have been published. These studies have not provided evidence that RF exposure from the transmitters increases the risk of cancer. Likewise, long-term animal studies have not established an increased risk of cancer from exposure to RF fields, even at levels that are much higher than produced by base stations and wireless networks.
Other effects: Few studies have investigated general health effects in individuals exposed to RF fields from base stations. This is because of the difficulty in distinguishing possible health effects from the very low signals emitted by base stations from other higher strength RF signals in the environment. Most studies have focused on the RF exposures of mobile phone users. Human and animal studies examining brain wave patterns, cognition and behaviour after exposure to RF fields, such as those generated by mobile phones, have not identified adverse effects. RF exposures used in these studies were about 1000 times higher than those associated with general public exposure from base stations or wireless networks. No consistent evidence of altered sleep or cardiovascular function has been reported.
Some individuals have reported that they experience non-specific symptoms upon exposure to RF fields emitted from base stations and other EMF devices. As recognized in a recent WHO fact sheet “Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity”, EMF has not been shown to cause such symptoms. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize the plight of people suffering from these symptoms.
From all evidence accumulated so far, no adverse short- or long-term health effects have been shown to occur from the RF signals produced by base stations. Since wireless networks produce generally lower RF signals than base stations, no adverse health effects are expected from exposure to them.
International exposure guidelines have been developed to provide protection against established effects from RF fields by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP, 1998) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE, 2005).
National authorities should adopt international standards to protect their citizens against adverse levels of RF fields. They should restrict access to areas where exposure limits may be exceeded.
Public perception of risk
Some people perceive risks from RF exposure as likely and even possibly severe. Several reasons for public fear include media announcements of new and unconfirmed scientific studies, leading to a feeling of uncertainty and a perception that there may be unknown or undiscovered hazards. Other factors are aesthetic concerns and a feeling of a lack of control or input to the process of determining the location of new base stations. Experience shows that education programmes as well as effective communications and involvement of the public and other stakeholders at appropriate stages of the decision process before installing RF sources can enhance public confidence and acceptability.
Considering the very low exposure levels and research results collected to date, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects.
WHO, through the International EMF Project, has established a programme to monitor the EMF scientific literature, to evaluate the health effects from exposure to EMF in the range from 0 to 300 GHz, to provide advice about possible EMF hazards and to identify suitable mitigation measures. Following extensive international reviews, the International EMF Project has promoted research to fill gaps in knowledge. In response national governments and research institutes have funded over $250 million on EMF research over the past 10 years.
While no health effects are expected from exposure to RF fields from base stations and wireless networks, research is still being promoted by WHO to determine whether there are any health consequences from the higher RF exposures from mobile phones.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a WHO specialized agency, is expected to conduct a review of cancer risk from RF fields in 2006-2007 and the International EMF Project will then undertake an overall health risk assessment for RF fields in 2007-2008.
ICNIRP (1998) www.icnirp.org/documents/
IEEE (2006) IEEE C95.1-2005 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz”
Base stations & wireless networks: Exposures & health consequences
Fact sheet: Electromagnetic fields and public health: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
WHO handbook on “Establishing a Dialogue on Risks from Electromagnetic Fields”
2006 WHO Research Agenda for Radio Frequency Fields
For more information contact:
Here is the WHO fact sheet.
EMF fields from electrical wiring is likely more of an issue.
Electromagnetic fields and public health
Exposure to extremely low frequency fields
The use of electricity has become an integral part of everyday life. Whenever electricity flows, both electric and magnetic fields exist close to the lines that carry electricity, and close to appliances. Since the late 1970s, questions have been raised whether exposure to these extremely low frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields (EMF) produces adverse health consequences. Since then, much research has been done, successfully resolving important issues and narrowing the focus of future research.
In 1996, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the International Electromagnetic Fields Project to investigate potential health risks associated with technologies emitting EMF. A WHO Task Group recently concluded a review of the health implications of ELF fields (WHO, 2007).
This Fact Sheet is based on the findings of that Task Group and updates recent reviews on the health effects of ELF EMF published in 2002 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), established under the auspices of WHO, and by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in 2003.
ELF field sources and residential exposures
Electric and magnetic fields exist wherever electric current flows – in power lines and cables, residential wiring and electrical appliances. Electric fields arise from electric charges, are measured in volts per metre (V/m) and are shielded by common materials, such as wood and metal. Magnetic fields arise from the motion of electric charges (i.e. a current), are expressed in tesla (T), or more commonly in millitesla (mT) or microtesla (µT). In some countries another unit called the gauss, (G), is commonly used (10,000 G = 1 T). These fields are not shielded by most common materials, and pass easily through them. Both types of fields are strongest close to the source and diminish with distance.
Most electric power operates at a frequency of 50 or 60 cycles per second, or hertz (Hz). Close to certain appliances, the magnetic field values can be of the order of a few hundred microtesla. Underneath power lines, magnetic fields can be about 20 µT and electric fields can be several thousand volts per metre. However, average residential power-frequency magnetic fields in homes are much lower – about 0.07 µT in Europe and 0.11 µT in North America. Mean values of the electric field in the home are up to several tens of volts per metre.
Task group evaluation
In October 2005, WHO convened a Task Group of scientific experts to assess any risks to health that might exist from exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields in the frequency range >0 to 100,000 Hz (100 kHz). While IARC examined the evidence regarding cancer in 2002, this Task Group reviewed evidence for a number of health effects, and updated the evidence regarding cancer. The conclusions and recommendations of the Task Group are presented in a WHO Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) monograph (WHO, 2007).
Following a standard health risk assessment process, the Task Group concluded that there are no substantive health issues related to ELF electric fields at levels generally encountered by members of the public. Thus the remainder of this fact sheet addresses predominantly the effects of exposure to ELF magnetic fields.
There are established biological effects from acute exposure at high levels (well above 100 µT) that are explained by recognized biophysical mechanisms. External ELF magnetic fields induce electric fields and currents in the body which, at very high field strengths, cause nerve and muscle stimulation and changes in nerve cell excitability in the central nervous system.
Potential long-term effects
Much of the scientific research examining long-term risks from ELF magnetic field exposure has focused on childhood leukaemia. In 2002, IARC published a monograph classifying ELF magnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”. This classification is used to denote an agent for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity in experimental animals (other examples include coffee and welding fumes). This classification was based on pooled analyses of epidemiological studies demonstrating a consistent pattern of a two-fold increase in childhood leukaemia associated with average exposure to residential power-frequency magnetic field above 0.3 to 0.4 µT. The Task Group concluded that additional studies since then do not alter the status of this classification.
However, the epidemiological evidence is weakened by methodological problems, such as potential selection bias. In addition, there are no accepted biophysical mechanisms that would suggest that low-level exposures are involved in cancer development. Thus, if there were any effects from exposures to these low-level fields, it would have to be through a biological mechanism that is as yet unknown. Additionally, animal studies have been largely negative. Thus, on balance, the evidence related to childhood leukaemia is not strong enough to be considered causal.
Childhood leukaemia is a comparatively rare disease with a total annual number of new cases estimated to be 49,000 worldwide in 2000. Average magnetic field exposures above 0.3 μT in homes are rare: it is estimated that only between 1% and 4% of children live in such conditions. If the association between magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia is causal, the number of cases worldwide that might be attributable to magnetic field exposure is estimated to range from 100 to 2400 cases per year, based on values for the year 2000, representing 0.2 to 4.95% of the total incidence for that year. Thus, if ELF magnetic fields actually do increase the risk of the disease, when considered in a global context, the impact on public health of ELF EMF exposure would be limited.
A number of other adverse health effects have been studied for possible association with ELF magnetic field exposure. These include other childhood cancers, cancers in adults, depression, suicide, cardiovascular disorders, reproductive dysfunction, developmental disorders, immunological modifications, neurobehavioural effects and neurodegenerative disease. The WHO Task Group concluded that scientific evidence supporting an association between ELF magnetic field exposure and all of these health effects is much weaker than for childhood leukaemia. In some instances (i.e. for cardiovascular disease or breast cancer) the evidence suggests that these fields do not cause them.
International exposure guidelines
Health effects related to short-term, high-level exposure have been established and form the basis of two international exposure limit guidelines (ICNIRP, 1998; IEEE, 2002). At present, these bodies consider the scientific evidence related to possible health effects from long-term, low-level exposure to ELF fields insufficient to justify lowering these quantitative exposure limits.
For high-level short-term exposures to EMF, adverse health effects have been scientifically established (ICNIRP, 2003). International exposure guidelines designed to protect workers and the public from these effects should be adopted by policy makers. EMF protection programs should include exposure measurements from sources where exposures might be expected to exceed limit values.
Regarding long-term effects, given the weakness of the evidence for a link between exposure to ELF magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia, the benefits of exposure reduction on health are unclear. In view of this situation, the following recommendations are given:
Government and industry should monitor science and promote research programmes to further reduce the uncertainty of the scientific evidence on the health effects of ELF field exposure. Through the ELF risk assessment process, gaps in knowledge have been identified and these form the basis of a new research agenda.
Member States are encouraged to establish effective and open communication programmes with all stakeholders to enable informed decision-making. These may include improving coordination and consultation among industry, local government, and citizens in the planning process for ELF EMF-emitting facilities.
When constructing new facilities and designing new equipment, including appliances, low-cost ways of reducing exposures may be explored. Appropriate exposure reduction measures will vary from one country to another. However, policies based on the adoption of arbitrary low exposure limits are not warranted.
WHO – World Health Organization. Extremely low frequency fields. Environmental Health Criteria, Vol. 238. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2007.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. Lyon, IARC, 2002 (Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 80).
ICNIRP – International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Exposure to static and low frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (0-100 kHz). Bernhardt JH et al., eds. Oberschleissheim, International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection, 2003 (ICNIRP 13/2003).
ICNIRP – International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (1998). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics 74(4), 494-522.
IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 28. IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electromagnetic fields, 0-3 kHz. New York, NY, IEEE – The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2002 (IEEE Std C95.6-2002).
Jan S. Weiner, Ph.D.
Department of Special Education
California State University, Fullerton
“Cowardice asks the question, is it safe? Expediency asks, is it polite? Vanity asks, is it popular? But conscience asks the question, is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor polite, nor popular — but one must take it because it’s right.” Martin Luther King, Jr
Thank you for stepping forward Jan. There are two sides to this debate. On one side are extremely powerful vested financial, compromised scientific and nefarios political interests. On the other side are countless brain damaged children, many others unaware that their wombs will someday be barren. It is along side those that we stand in the gap. In the middle are the willfully ignorant leaders, scientists, educators, and elected representatives that stand in the way of putting an end to an agenda that I believe is straight from the pit of hell.
Thank you for summarizing the very nature of The Fullerton Informer and our quest to end the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known with your quote from Dr. King. I couldn’t have expressed the very nature of our mission in a more forthright and compelling manner.
There is nothing like owning an alignment shop in a town full of potholes. Life is good at special ed central as long as the machine keeps turning them out and no one pops the bubble. The atmospheric chemistry inside that bubble cannot remain in equilibrium because the equation is shifting to the right side of things now folks. We can no longer afford to ignore the explosive Autism epidemic, the infertility crisis unfolding as we speak and the ongoing pruning of our children’s mental faculties taking place right before all of our very eyes with our tacit approval and complicit silence.
Please don’t join the ranks of those who have sold out and turned their backs on the children.
- See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/jan-weiner-speaks/#sthash.BxtMBzuv.dpuf
THE FULLERTON FIVE PART 2- For the health of our children, can reason prevail? – See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/the-fullerton-five-part-2-for-the-health-of-our-children-can-reason-prevail?
THE FULLERTON FIVE PART 2- For the health of our children, can reason prevail?
Today another group in Fullerton has decided to address the FSD Board of Trustess. Lets see if the Fullerton Five still read their mail. This email was sent to me by a fellow colleague and is worthy of a post. It appears to have been produced and sent by a group called FCSST which stands for Fullerton Community for Safe School Technology. I don’t know about you but I should be a card carrying member by now and so should the rest of you. Here is the email that was sent to me:
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Fullerton Community <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Fullerton, California School District Trustees: For the health of our children, can reason prevail?
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
To:Fullerton California School District Trustees
Fullerton School District trustees, please acknowledge the potential harms to our children in the wireless classrooms and immediately declare a moratorium on wireless technology in the schools.
We all value technology and where it’s brought us today. But as parents and community we feel the need to take a step back from it and ask that the district wire the technology to prevent any possible harm to our children.
This is a direct quote from a letter written by The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) on November, 2013 with regards to wireless technology in schools.
”The peer reviewed, scientific literature demonstrates the correlation between RF exposure and neurological, cardiac, and pulmonary disease as well as reproductive and developmental disorders, immune dysfunction, cancer and other health conditions. The evidence is irrefutable.”
See this link for the entire letter:
The Fullerton School Board (FSD) members were sent a letter from AAEM on May 13, 2013. This is what the Academy told you, the FSD trustees: “To install this system in your school district risks a widespread public health hazard that the medical system is not yet prepared to address. Statistics show that you can expect to see an immediate reaction in 3% and delayed effects in 30%, including teachers.” The question to FSD trustees is this: Have you read the letter? Do you think parents and teachers would knowingly allow their children and themselves to be exposed to these harms?
This is a direct quote from a letter written on August, 2013 to the FCC by the head of the American Association of Pediatrics which represents over 60,000 primary care pediatricians, pediatric medical sub-specialists, and pediatric surgical specialists dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults:
“ Current FCC standards do not account for the unique vulnerability and use patterns specific to pregnant women and children. It is essential that any new standard for cell phones or other wireless devices be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable populations to ensure they are safeguarded throughout their lifetimes.”
Please see this link for the entire letter:
Upon doing more research it was found that other organizations such as the EPA, FDA and NIOSH have warned the FCC that their guidelines are “seriously flawed”. Other countries were ahead of the US in implementing these devices in schools. A lot of these countries have had adverse effects and have since pulled back from wireless and opted for safer wired technology. Please find this comprehensive link to what other countries have done through their experience:
A lot of studies have shown that the RFs (or Radio Frequencies) emitted by ipads, cell phones, WiFi etc. cause changes in human cells, DNA, chromosomes etc. Studies have shown links to cancer, infertility, nerve damage and so much more. The effects of RFs are even more compounded in children because of the interference with their growing bodies.
Here are some quotes from leading scientists and doctors about this technology:
Here is Dr. Anthony Miller, World Health Organization (WHO) scientist, at the Government Management Committee about Cell Tower proliferation in the City, stating wireless radiation would be classified 2A (probable) carcinogen if evaluated today and recommends prudent avoidance.
FSD states that the radiation from these devices are below FCC standards. FCC standards were set 18 years ago when none of these devices were in place and a lot of the new studies were not out yet. FCC standards are set based on thermal effects (the ability of these devices to heat tissue). Scientists have since discovered effects on an electromagnetic level that have the capacity to alter DNA. This can happen at a much lower level (by as much as 1000 times lower) than those set by the FCC. Please listen to this lecture by Dr. Martin Blank, an associate professor from Columbia University that explains the science behind this DNA alteration phenomenon:
These are letters written by numerous medical doctors and scientists all imploring LA Unified School District schools to use wired technology:
We’re sure a lot of you own these devices and use them on a regular basis, as do we. Having these devices at home means that you have one or two devices in some of the rooms in your house. Having these devices at school means having 24 plus (up to 36) devices in one room with kids being exposed to radiation emissions even when they are not in use. That is an exponential amount of exposure of a class 2B carcinogen to our children for 6 hours a day 5 days a week.
As exciting and educational as this technology is we have to ask ourselves is it worth the price of our children’s health? The same technology exists in a wired format. We are asking the district to wire this technology as a precautionary measure against this potential danger to our children.
While all the technology fund raising efforts have brought in the support of the PTAs, school foundations, local business and corporate sponsorships, does it make sense to proceed on a path fraught with potential health harms to the very children they are trying to help? Are these well-intentioned individuals and groups aware that they are funding technology with known and significant health detriments to the kids and teachers?
For the past 9 months, parents and community have been trying to present the documented information that exists on wireless radiation to the FSD school trustees. FSD response has been a mixture of assurances that the classroom radiation is okay and silence on the evidence contrary to your technology plan. Unmoved, you continue to roll out the wireless technology. It appears to us that you are intentionally and determinedly remaining ignorant of this information.
In the words of FSD Superintendent Robert Pletka, the wireless classrooms “are totally safe for our children.” With the aforementioned information, how can this be?
Within the past couple of months, the parents of three children at Acacia Elementary School had to pull their children out of the school due to their concerns about the wireless radiation emissions. If you have ever contemplated moving your children to another school, this can be quite agonizing. Your children are made to leave their school friends, teacher, and other regular and stable elements of their life. These parents knew and understood the health detriments. FSD told them no other accommodations could be made for them at Acacia. As both parents work, the family was forced to make very costly arrangements to assure the safety of their children. With a stretch of their household budget they were able to afford to do this. What about the parents that cannot afford to home school their students? Parents have no choice in the matter.
It appears that FSD is making public school available only to those that accept mandatory exposure to a Class 2b possible human carcinogen. Recall WHO scientist Dr. Miller states it would be classified today as a probable carcinogen? What parents, in their right mind, would allow this?
Wireless radiation cannot be seen, heard or felt but modern science gives us the ability to see it’s profound effect on the human body. Enough research and studies have been done to demand precaution for our students and teachers. Are we willing to use the children and teachers as guinea pigs?
As FSD trustees, you are held in the public trust, which entails a great responsibility, as you are accountable not only to the children and parents but the taxpayers. This responsibility vastly exceeds any other consideration, influence, or party, be it a risk management firm or administrator. It is, therefore, incumbent upon all of you to look at all of the evidence.
Once again, Fullerton School District trustees, please acknowledge the potential harms to our children in the wireless classrooms and immediately declare a moratorium on this technology until the time where consensuses of safety are arrived at. As with tobacco, which took decades to determine it causes lung cancer and death, we don’t want to wait for such a determination for our children.
Fullerton Community For Safe School Technology
Safety first with our school technology
Be informed + Take action
Please visit us and pass it on: www.fcsst.com
Fullerton Community For Safe School Technology
So without any further ado gang, may I re-introduce “The Fullerton Five” here to all of you:
Let’s see what they have to say. Or, let’s see if we have to be forced to listen to their continued silence on this crucial issue as the kids continue to be irradiated. Stay tuned.
- See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/the-fullerton-five-part-2-for-the-health-of-our-children-can-reason-prevail/#sthash.dvZo8sWq.dpuf
Make no bones about it, the dosage is higher than a kite and it is not what the doctor ordered. Are your kids at risk at school in these wireless classrooms with the schools using commercial or industrial grade routers that broadcast on several frequencies at the same time? You want your kids slouched over an in use wireless radiation emitting cell phone all day? How about at home or everywhere else with these things right in front of their heads and in their laps all the time? That is exactly what your children are doing at school and at home. These tablet devices are microwave transmitters and emit wireless radiation trillions of times the normal background levels that many of us and our parents were exposed to as children.
What will it take to get the parents to act. I think that there are many obstacles, not the least of which is them dealing with the fact that they themselves have been irradiating their children since the beginning. So if they acknowledge this as harmful, then they have to deal with their guilt. It is time to deal with reality, swallow the pride and put your children ahead of your fears, the school administrators and your fair weather friends ladies and gentlemen. We are talking about your kids, a trillion dollar industry that doesn’t give a rat’s behind about them, and school administrators that will do whatever they are ordered to do without batting an eye.
Let us begin.
In this chart, we can see that for those that used a cell phone for over 1640 hours in 1-4 years, meaning about an hour a day, had an OR of 4.8 for developing a meningioma brain tumor and an OR of 3.77 for developing a glioma.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on
use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours
diagnosed in 1997-2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006
It takes a certain amount of exposure for brain tumors to start to appear. In this chart by a Swedish team of independent researchers lead by Lennart Hardell, there was only a slight increase in risk from using a cell phone 1-1000 hours. The brain tumor risk really jumped, however, after 1000 hours of usage, and was much higher with prolonged usage.
According to the science, using a cell phone for over 1000 hours leads to an increased risk of brain cancer. According to the manufacturer, iPads emit as much or more radiation than cell phones. According to research, children absorb more radiation than adults. Given this evidence, what will happen to these children who spend at least 4 hours a day on an iPad at school, followed by another 4 hours at home? This is at least 2000 hours each and every year, and at least 12,000 hours of exposure in elementary school alone.
Papers finding adverse biological effects such as impaired fertility or damage to health from Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5 GHz).
Avendaño C. et al., 2012. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1): 39-45.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Aynali G. et al., 2013. Modulation of wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5): 1695-1700.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163. http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5: 273-300.http://www.icems.eu/
Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic fields.http://www.istanbul.
Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine and selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol. 85(8): 680-689. http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in human leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 88(6): 449–456.http://www.ncbi.nlm.
Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices. Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of print.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
The International Coalition for an Electromagnetic Safe Planet (IC-ESP)
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”
Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5
GHz).Papers listed are only those where exposures were 16V/m or below.
Someone using a Wi-Fi-enabled tablet computer can be exposed to
electromagnetic fields up to 16V/m. Papers are in alphabetical order.
A file of first pages, for printing, can be found here (please pass on
Atasoy H.I. et al., 2013. Immunohistopathologic demonstration of
deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves
emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices. Journal of Pediatric Urology
internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases
sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1):
induce DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa in vitro by a
non-thermal effect: a preliminary report. American Society for
Reproductive Medicine 66th Annual Meeting: O-249
oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur
Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5):
Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on
oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from
wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163.
Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability
shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic
nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
Havas M. and Marrongelle J. 2013. Replication of heart rate
variability provocation study with 2.45GHz cordless phone confirms
original findings. Electromagn Biol Med 32(2):
Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert
gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop on
Biological Effects of Electromagnetic
Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker
responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of
Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine and
selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and
electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol.
85(8): 680-689. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative
stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in human
leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology
Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012b. Melatonin modulates wireless (2.45
GHz)-induced oxidative injury through TRPM2 and voltage gated Ca(2+)
channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion in rat. Physiol Behav.
Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against
oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices.
Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of
Papageorgiou C. C. et al., 2011. Effects of Wi-Fi signals on the p300
component of event-related potentials during an auditory hayling task.
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 10(2): 189-202.
(Wi-Fi alters brain activity in young
Shahin S. et al., 2013. 2.45 GHz Microwave Irradiation-Induced
Oxidative Stress Affects Implantation or Pregnancy in Mice, Mus
musculus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1727–1751.
Türker Y. et al., 2011. Selenium and L-carnitine reduce oxidative
stress in the heart of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless
devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 143(3): 1640-1650.
A few more studies of similar microwave frequencies at low exposures
(6V/m or below):
Balmori A. 2010. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana
temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn.
Biol. Med. 29(1-2):31-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Erdinc O. O. et al., 2003. Electromagnetic waves of 900MHz in acute
pentylenetetrazole model in ontogenesis in mice. Neurol. Sci.
Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Stimulation of murine natural killer cells
by weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range. Biofizika
Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. I.
Effect of whole body microwave irradiation on tumor necrosis factor
production in mouse cells, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.
Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability
shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic
nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Microwave exposure affecting
reproductive system in male rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Fifty-gigahertz microwave exposure
effect of radiations on rat brain. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
Khurana V. G. et al., 2010. Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk
from Mobile Phone Base Stations. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health
Maier R. et al., 2004. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on
cognitive processes – a pilot study on pulsed field interference
with cognitive regeneration. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 110:
Nittby H. et al., 2008. Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term
exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 29:
Novoselova E. G. et al., 1998. Stimulation of production of tumor
necrosis factor by murine macrophages when exposed in vivo and in
vitro to weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range Bofizika
Novoselova E. G. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. II.
Immunostimulating effects of microwaves and naturally occurring
antioxidant nutrients. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.
Otitoloju A. A. et al., 2010. Preliminary study on the induction of
sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to
radiofrequency radiations from Global System for Mobile Communication
Base Stations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 84(1):51-4.
Panagopoulos D. J.et al., 2010. Bioeffects of mobile telephony
radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Vol 86(5):345-357.
Persson B. R. R. et al., 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability in
rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communication.
Wireless Networks 3: 455-461.
Pyrpasopoulou A. et al., 2004. Bone morphogenic protein expression in
newborn kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiation.
Salford L. G. et al., 2010. Effects of microwave radiation upon the
mammalian blood-brain barrier. European Journal of Oncology Library
Salford L. G., et al., 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain
after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ. Health
Perspect. 111:881-883. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
“Two new papers are published in Pathophysiology this fall that may be
of interest to you.
These papers are the same content as the 2012 BioInitiative Report
by Martha Herbert and Cindy Sage
This counters the usual criticism that ‘it isn’t good science’ unless
it is peer-review published.
The US annual cost for autism is reported to be $137 billion.
That compares to the EU annual cost for cancer (105 billion
euros/$147 billion USD)
and to heart disease ((165 billion euros/$227 billion USD).
Staggering costs, and the prevalence of autism now in the US is one
child in 88
(one child in 50 by 2012 estimates that include the 8 yr and younger
In 1975, it was one child in 5000. This is a 100-fold increase.
It parallels the explosive rise in wireless technologies and their
pulsed RFR. It should be
considered another possible risk factor for autism, autism spectrum
conditions and ADHD.
The public sidewalk, free speech, our children’s health
An 87 year old grandmother asked if this is Nazi Germany at Acacia Elementary School in Fullerton California as the school called the cops on her and other law abiding moms passing this out: Parents For Safe Schools – flyer (1)
———- Forwarded message ———-
Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM
Subject: The public sidewalk, free speech and our children’s health.
To: Karen Whisnant <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Robert Pletka <email@example.com>, Chris Thompson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, “Rep. Ed Royce” <CA39ERima@mail.house.gov>, Davis Barber <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Beverly Berryman <email@example.com>, lynn thornley <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Hilda Sugarman <email@example.com>, janny meyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net” <GGIOKARIS@fjuhsd.net>, Mar Buc <JWILLIAMS@fjuhsd.net>, david morrison <email@example.com>, “Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org” <Foundation@theacaciapartnership.org>, “PTA@theacaciapartnership.org” <PTA@theacaciapartnership.org>
Dear Dr. Whisnant,
- See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/the-public-sidewalk-free-speech-our-childrens-health/#sthash.ayJ3yd4p.dpuf
JUNK SCIENCE: 70/30 with some wireless industry dough gets you 50/50 and your kids the shaft in the wireless classrooms.
The following is an excellent article from : http://www.seattlemag.com/article/nerd-report/nerd-report
This is must read!
UW Scientist Henry Lai Makes Waves in the Cell Phone Industry
Naomi Ishisaka | January 2011 | FROM THE PRINT EDITION
A greeting card on bioengineering professor Henry Lai’s office wall at the University of Washington contains this quotation from Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.”
This philosophy could well sum up Lai’s work on the effects of low-level radiation on DNA, as well as what he believes should be the guiding principle of science: independent investigation and research leading to discovery for the public good. Yet the soft-spoken scientist’s steadfast belief in that principle has placed his research at the center of a persistent global controversy and created powerful enemies that tried to get him fired and essentially succeeded in drying up the source of funding for the type of research he was doing.
Lai admits that he was naive. He came to the UW in 1972 and earned a doctorate in psychology. Two decades later, as a bioengineering researcher, he studied esoteric scientific topics in relative obscurity. He and a fellow researcher, Narendra “N.P.” Singh, were looking at the effects of nonionizing microwave radiation—the same type of radiation emitted by cell phones—on the DNA of rats. They used a level of radiation considered safe by government standards and found that the DNA in the brain cells of the rats was damaged—or broken—by exposure to the radiation. Ironically, cell phones weren’t even on Lai’s mind when he performed the initial studies. Funded initially by the Office of Naval Research, Lai was investigating how radar, which emits radio-frequency radiation, affects the health of operators. “We did not really pay attention to the importance of this thing,” he recalls. But during his research, cell phone giant Motorola Inc. indicated that someone had told the company about Lai’s unpublished results. Motorola asked to meet with him in his lab and at a meeting in Copenhagen.
After Lai and Singh’s research finding an effect on DNA was published in 1995, Lai learned of a full-scale effort to discredit his work. In an internal company memo leaked to Microwave News, a publication that examines health and environmental effects of electromagnetic radiation, Motorola described its plan to “war-game” and undermine Lai’s research. After initially accepting industry funding for continued research from the Wireless Technology Research (WTR) program (created to manage $25 million in research funds), Lai and Singh wrote an open letter to Microwave News questioning restrictions placed on their research by the funders. After that, the head of WTR sent a memo asking then-UW president Richard McCormick to fire Lai and Singh. McCormick refused, but the dustup sent a clear message to Lai and his colleagues.
“This shocked me,” Lai says, “the letter trying to discredit me, the ‘war games’ memo. As a scientist doing research, I was not expecting to be involved in a political situation. It opened my eyes on how games are played in the world of business.”
Thus was launched an epic battle over research and truth. If Lai and Singh were correct about the potential impact on brain cells from radio-frequency radiation, there could be billions of dollars on the line for the cell phone industry in potential liability, leading to significant design changes and lost market expansion.
To the layperson, the science behind Lai’s work, which was largely funded by the National Institutes of Health, and industry-funded research to contradict it is mind-numbingly complex. Virtually every assertion of risk has a counterassertion of no risk. For every independent study showing damage to DNA and memory, there is a study showing the opposite.
Lai, 61, says this phenomenon could be a direct result of the way science is now funded around the world. “[The U.S. was on] the cutting edge of this whole area for the last 30 years. [But] right now, we’re the Third World country. We’re not doing research at all,” Lai says. With government funding all but nonexistent, the bulk of scientific research is funded by private industry. “The mechanism is funding,” Lai says. “You don’t bite the hand that feeds you. The pressure is very impressive.”
The massive Interphone study, coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and released in May 2010, exemplifies these challenges.
Purported to be the definitive word on cell phone radiation and brain tumors, Interphone involved 13 countries (all outside the U.S.), $25 million, and thousands of tumor patients and controls. Conducted over 10 years, the widely anticipated study was supposed to at last provide clarity on the risks of cell phone use. Yet, once again, the science was divided. The day after the study’s release, headlines read, “No answer, just fuzz, from cell phone study,” and, “One conclusion emerges from Interphone study: Controversy will continue.”
Why, after so much money and time, were the data so mixed? Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News, says there were a number of problems with Interphone. “When we started interviewing the protagonists,” he says, “we realized there was a lot of conflict going on. It was a bitter struggle. It tells you the interpretation of the data is not clear cut in any way.”
For the purposes of the Interphone study, a person who used a cell phone 30 minutes a day for more than 10 years was considered to be subjected to heavy exposure. Today, that level of cell phone use (900 minutes a month) is average. The people defined as the most heavily exposed in the Interphone study now represent the average user.
To illustrate that point, Elisabeth Cardis, head of the Interphone study, was quoted as saying, “In my personal opinion, I think we have a number of elements that suggest a possible increased risk among the heaviest users, and because the heaviest users in our study are considered the low users today, I think that’s something of concern. Until stronger conclusions can be drawn one way or another, it may be reasonable to reduce one’s exposure.”
Lai’s frustration with the increasing body of contradictory research led him to do an analysis in 2006 of the available studies on cell phone radiation between 1990 and 2006, and where their funding came from. What he found was that 50 percent of the 326 studies showed a biological effect from radio-frequency radiation and 50 percent did not. But when he filtered the studies into two stacks—those funded by the wireless industry and those funded independently—Lai discovered industry-funded studies were 30 percent likely to find an effect, as opposed to 70 percent of the independent studies.
Lai says that, while his findings highlight the crucial role industry funding plays in scientific research, the 50-50 split alone should be cause for concern. “Even if you accept all the industry studies, you still end up with 50-50,” he says. “How could 50 percent all be garbage? People always start with the statement ‘Hundreds of studies have been done on this topic, and no effect has been found,’ but this is a very misleading statement. [The statements] come out from the cell phone industry, and people just use it, like the American Cancer Society. People haven’t even gone in to look at the real studies and look at the effects that people have reported. This really worries me, because people come out and say things without the facts.”
Slesin agrees and says Lai’s work is important for the research that does show effects from radiation. “[Lai] is one of the most widely cited scientists in this field,” Slesin says.
The American Cancer Society did not reply to requests for an interview. Its official position on the risks of cell phone use states: “Radio frequency (RF) waves given off by cell phones don’t have enough energy to damage DNA directly. Because of this, many scientists believe that cell phones aren’t able to cause cancer. Most studies done in the lab have supported this theory, finding that RF waves do not cause DNA damage.”
CTIA-The Wireless Association, the cell phone industry trade organization, also declined to comment for this story, but its website states: “To date, global health organizations believe that the available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones. Many studies of low-level RF exposure, such as that which occurs with wireless devices, have not discovered any negative biological effects.”
Dr. Beth Mueller, an epidemiologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, acknowledges that there is not strong evidence linking cell phones to brain tumors. But Mueller warns that the research is difficult and that much more study is needed. “I think [cell phone radiation] would be important to study. There are no studies I know of on the possible impact on children and I think it’s something that many people–including some people here at the Hutch–want to see evaluated. I’m concerned because children are using [cell phones] a lot. It’s something that should be looked at, definitely.”
Katy Rock would agree. The Kirkland resident is an athletic 31-year-old who began having headaches in her late teens. “Headaches became an unwelcome fact of life for me in college,” she says, “at first always after running around on the soccer or lacrosse field. So I assumed for years that it was due to dehydration/nutrition problems or just being out of shape. Eventually, they got worse. I started having them with no explainable cause.”
It wasn’t until a she had a seizure in 2007 that Rock discovered something was terribly wrong. The next day, she underwent an emergency double craniotomy to remove a tumor the size of a small lemon from her right frontal lobe and two tumors the size of large grapes from her right temporal lobe. A biopsy showed the cancerous tumors had been growing for about 10 years. A year of chemotherapy followed.
Rock was an early adopter of cell phones. Given a phone as a gift during college in 1997, she recalls using it about two to three hours a week (about 630 minutes a month). Her usage increased in later years with a job that required her to be on call. She is right-handed, and her tumors were on the right side.
Rock, who recently completed her first 5K run in support of Seattle Children’s Hospital’s Pediatric Brain Tumor Research Guild, would not be surprised to find a link between cell phones and brain tumors. “When I was in college, I used to charge my cell phone at night, and the charger cord ran over a leaf of my philodendron plant,” she says. “Over time, the strip on the leaf where the cord touched turned brown. The small amount of power running through the cord was enough to kill some cells of the otherwise healthy plant.”
While Rock’s tale is merely metaphorical, its suggestive import is not lost on Devra Davis, Ph.D., a huge admirer of Lai’s work to raise awareness about the potential hazards of cell phone radiation. Davis is a longtime toxicologist, public health expert and founder of the Wyoming-based Environmental Health Trust, a group that provides basic research and training on environmental health hazards. Davis’ most recent book, released last October, is Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation. Davis calls Lai a “hero” for his groundbreaking work. “[Lai] has made a tremendous impact on the field in many aspects. Not just on the field of DNA, but on the brain, on receptors. In a fair and just world he would be a serious candidate for the Nobel Prize, because he did foundational research on the way the body responds to electromagnetic and radiofrequency radiation and because he persisted in the face of many challenges. He’s been outstanding and indomitable in the face of opposition that would have overwhelmed most people.”
In her book, Davis describes a disconnect between the general public’s largely unquestioning acceptance of cell phone radiation and the large body of evidence suggesting cause for concern. With Lai’s work as her foundation, Davis demonstrates a pattern of the cell phone industry’s scientific manipulation spanning decades. Davis is particularly concerned because the rate of cell phone use by children is skyrocketing—with three out of four 12-year-olds and half of 10-years-olds in the U.S. now possessing a cell phone. Even more troubling: Lennart Hardell, Ph.D., a researcher in Sweden, found that those who began using cell phones in their teens (such as Rock) had four to five times the number of malignant tumors by their late 20s as those who did not use cell hones as teenagers.
While Davis would argue that there is a proven, causal link between cell phones and tumors, Lai does not. What he does say is that there is enough reason for concern, and that a “precautionary principle” should be embraced, as France has done in warning against cell phone use by children, and as San Francisco has done in mandating information on “specific absorption rates” of radiation on cell phone packaging.
“European countries generally believe you need some kind of precautionary approach,” says Lai, who does not own—or use—a cell phone. “What else can we do? Obviously, we don’t know the answer at all. But, then, there is a cause for concern. We need to take some kind of precautionary action.” For now, however, Lai will continue to do research on the drug artemisinin—long used by Chinese herbalists—for applications in cancer treatment, because there is no longer any independent funding available for his research on the effects of nonionizing radiation.
Meanwhile, Davis, who uses a cell phone but only with a headset or as a speakerphone (she never keeps it close to her body), hopes that by the time the public realizes the importance of the path Lai has been on, it won’t be too late. In Disconnect, she wonders how our grandchildren will answer these questions: “Did we do the right thing and act to protect them? Or did we harm them needlessly, irresponsibly and permanently, blinded by the addictive delights of our technological age?”
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, IPADS EMIT MORE RADIATION THAN A CELL PHONE. YOUR CHILDREN ARE USING IPADS FOR MORE THAN 900 MINUTES A MONTH. THEY USE THEM FOR AT LEAST 900 MINUTES A WEEK AT SCHOOL. WHAT ABOUT AT HOME?
WHERE ARE THE IPADS KEPT WHILE IN USE? WHERE IS THE WIFI ANTENNA LOCATED IN THE IPAD?
DO YOU WANT YOUR KIDS TO HAVE KIDS? EXTRAPOLATE FROM THERE and KEEP DENYING BECAUSE YOU CANT FOR VERY MUCH LONGER.
DID ROMAN SCHULZE EVER GET BACK TO THE THE G.U.S.D. BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON WHY EUROPEANS ARE BANNING WIFI IN SCHOOLS? MAYBE HE NEEDS TO GET BACK IN TOUCH WITH HIS ROOTS ACROSS THE ATLANTIC.
The French assembly DID IT- NEW LAW PENDING ON EMF/RF
- See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/junk-science-7030-with-some-wireless-industry-dough-gets-you-5050-and-our-kids-the-shaft-in-the-wireless-classrooms/#sthash.akUiTcV3.dpuf
The brain becomes the child, the child becomes the brain:
They put the stores on every corner that peddle this stuff to the kids:
loaded to the hilt:
The choices are endless:
It starts out being fun:
Then it gets taken up a notch and becomes and obsession:
Suddenly, things begin to change and you wonder why?
You begin to wonder what is going on with your child’s new online friends:
It seemed like yesterday that your child would play outside but now this is all they want to do:
The parks and playgrounds around town now look like this on the weekends:
The sun is out and the kids are not:
Soon they stay up late at night and are not sleeping as much as before:
Now school is a place for rest:
Their behavior at home begins to change and you wonder why:
But mom, all the kids are gaming:
You begin to attempt to limit the screen time and the behavior you observe is frightening:
Soon, the friends your child has, only want to game. The child’s world is not the same anymore and you question if he will ever be the same:
You are losing control of your child to the screen time and the lack of sleep watching certain games involving all kinds of demonic images, violent, bloodthirsty thrill killing sprees, torture ,with places like dungeons, with every evil imaginable, ending up in right in front of your child’s face, eternally etching a place in the recesses of their formidable developing minds.
Now you are realizing that you are losing them to the:
The child regresses into a brave, dark, demonic new world. Activities from what seem to be a bygone era, rife with simple pleasures such as a bike ride or a trip to the park, now seem a million miles away:
Now human life has little meaning as a result of the constant conditioning:
Adult human life has little or no value:
Much less a child or or the unborn:
You rationalize it and buy him more of the latest and greatest because everyone is doing it:
Soon non stop demonic images end up parading at record speed right in front of your child’s face:
What happened to my child and will he need help?
Does he need:
Will he ever be the same and can I ever get him back from the blue glow and its darkness?
How did all this begin?
Soon one thing led to another with the screen time because the experts know best:
The screen time begins younger and younger with each passing year:
But the experts tell us we need them to compete:
Soon the use them more and more as they get older:
And soon screen time becomes all the time:
And before you know it, as you were when you were young:
You now find yourself older and all the more surrounded by the blue glow:
Many of the devices are designed to be two way wireless transmitters with infrared imagery sensing and audio feeds that continuously track, record, transmit the data offsite to unknown locations and all the while emit continuous pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation emissions 24/7 even when it IS TURNED OFF. It only stops the emissions when it is UNPLUGGED! Does your child sleep near one of these?
The wireless emissions are 24/7 in your child’s face:
In your child’s lap at home:
And in your child’s lap at school:
All the while seated under or near the wireless router at school:
or next to it at home:
And what is all of this screen time and wireless exposure doing to your child?
Does constant wireless exposure effect fertility?
There are those 6′s again-3 of them and what is with the luminescent energy splitting open the sphere?:
Did you know that the female gametes or eggs contain only the X sex chromosome ?
The boys gametes contain both the X and the Y chromosomes:
X -blue + Y-yellow= GREEN
Is this the heart of this device?
Who is the man behind this company? What is with the red mic?
What is the significance of the letters and their colors on these buttons again?
Who is ultimately behind the wireless radiation exposure safety guidelines and vaccination programs:
Who has the exclusive market on the wireless device market in the classrooms?
Here they are those three sixes again:
What is with the three 6′s?
What did Adam and Eve do wrong?
You just bought these for your children for Christmas:
It will spend more time with your child than you will:
Your school and PTA are pushing for these:
You find yourself supporting fundraising at the school for more:
And for years these will be transmitting pulse modulated microwave radiation in DIRECT CONTACT WITH:
At home by your choice as a parent:
And forced on your children at school:
Robert Pletka FSD superintendent:
“Your request that the district turn off wireless connectivity and remove IPads from your children’s respective classrooms….is respectfully DENIED.” 11-1-2013 letter to Joe Imbriano.
What does all this mean?
When you add all of this up, is this what we get?
And by the way, who is watching, listening, tracking, and developing algorithms and dossiers on you and your children through the black box trap doors from afar?
Cant get into school without these right?
No shots No school? Right?
Now you see the city and its people:
Now you don’t:
Where did everybody go?
YOU BETTER START ASKING SOME QUESTIONS PRETTY QUICKLY FOLKS.
START WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS BECAUSE WITHIN 5 YEARS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
THEY WILL ALL HAVE WIRELESS CLASSROOMS THANKS TO CONNECT ED:
99% OF US SCHOOL CLASSROOMS WITHIN FIVE YEARS WILL BE WIRELESS LEAVING NOWHERE TO RUN:
AT HOME YOU CAN OPT FOR WIRED TECHNOLOGY:
BUT NOT AT SCHOOL AS THERE WILL BE MANDATORY WIRELESS EXPOSURE :
BUT IT IS FOR THEIR FUTURE RIGHT?
WILL IT BE ONE IN WHICH BECOMING ONE OF THESE WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE?
WILL ENJOYING THESE SPECIAL DAYS THAT YOU AND I TAKE FOR GRANTED BECOME IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM SOMEDAY?
MAY ALMIGHTY GOD HELP US PROTECT THIS GENERATION THAT WE HAVE BEEN BESTOWED WITH THE PRIVILEGE OF AND ENTRUSTED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CARING FOR. MAY HE GRANT YOU THE WISDOM TO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES AND THE COURAGE TO STAND AGAINST IT- IN JESUS NAME. AMEN.
THE PHOTO OF THE ABOVE CHILD IS A PUBLICLY SHARED PHOTO FROM THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA’S FACEBOOK PAGE WHICH IS LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICTS OWN WEBSITE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&ref=nf
We have to consider the time-value of exposure for our children: how much radiation over time.
Start with micro waving a potato for example:
100% power x 5 minutes = 1 cooked potato
50% power x 10 minutes = 1 cooked potato
Total RF/EMF radiation over 10 years = serious health problems for our kids
Why take this risk?
FCC and OSHA officials agreed how to calculate total cumulative RF/EMF in a classroom, but the FCC guideline doesn’t consider this concept at all.
LET US NOW LOOK AT A CLASSROOM IN PETALUMA CALIFORNIA: http://rfemf.com/counter.html#calcs
FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA REFUSES TO SHUT THESE SYSTEMS OFF WHILE HE STATES THAT THIS IS “TOTALLY SAFE FOR OUR KIDS” http://fsd.k12.ca.us/parent_resources/files/wireless.pdf
TO THIS DATE, THE CURRENT FULLERTON SCHOOL BOARD HAS REMAINED EERILY SILENT ON THIS ISSUE IGNORING AND DOING NOTHING TO STOP THIS IN SPITE OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THEM VIA EMAIL AND AT BOARD MEETINGS.
WE BELIEVE THAT THIS IS AN UNAUTHORIZED RADIATION EXPERIMENT BEING CONDUCTED ON OUR CHILDREN. THERE ARE NO STUDIES ON THE EFFECTS OF THESE DEVICES ON CHILDREN OR STUDENTS IN THE CLASSROOM SETTING. ARE YOUR CHILDREN ARE THE TEST SUBJECTS?
TELL OUR REPRESENTATIVES THAT WE WILL HAVE NO PART OF IT. HELP US END IT. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THE DEVICES THAT WILL BE DEPLOYED IN THESE MICROWAVE MATRIX COMMON CORE COMPLIANT CLASSROOMS.
Will a $666.66 price tag a generation later, get you right into the laps of every school age child in America?
THE FOLLOWING IS A PUBLICLY SHARED PHOTO FROM THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA’S FACEBOOK PAGE WHICH IS LINKED UP ON THE DISTRICTS OWN WEBSITE: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=479084712158056&set=a.467172693349258.106292.467056220027572&type=1&ref=nf
THIS CHILD HAS A MICROWAVE TRANSMITTER THAT EMITS PULSE MODULATED MICROWAVE RADIATION WITH PEAK LEVELS POTENTIALLY TRILLIONS OF TIMES THE NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVELS RIGHT SMACK DAB IN HIS LAP IN DIRECT PROXIMITY TO THE CHILD’S SENSITIVE DEVELOPING REPRODUCTIVE AREA. THIS IS IN HIS CLASSROOM WHERE THE DEVICE IS UP AND RUNNING FOR MOST OF THE DAY. WHAT DO YOU THINK HAPPENS AT HOME?
$666.66 LIST PRICE $666.66 INVOICE
In all of my years on this planet with thousands of trips to the brick and mortar stores and online shopping, I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING PRICED AT $666.66? Have you? Well back in 1976 you may have been too busy waiting for the Freedom Train to roll into town, watching the midnite special or perhaps it was simply before your time. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that back then some folks launched their flagship with some down right eerie coordinates that will lead your children right into the optometrist, the oncologist and last stop is the fertility doctor’s office. Some 40 years later, what’s still in your face now is the black apple of somebody’s eye with a “byte” out of it. So what is going on with these WiFi systems and these devices?
WHILE OBAMA IS RAMMING HIS WIRELESS BROADBAND AGENDA INTO EVERY LAST SCHOOL IN AMERICA:
HOW DID APPLE GET THE TECHNOLOGY MONOPOLY IN THE SCHOOLS?
WHAT THE HECK ARE THESE MICROWAVE TRANSMITTERS DOING TO THE SENSITIVE DEVELOPING REPRODUCTIVE AREAS OF THESE CHILDREN?
GIRLS ARE BORN WITH THEIR IMMATURE FOLLICLES THAT BECOME EGGS.
WHAT ARE THESE DEVICES DOING TO THEIR EGGS?
ARE THE NON-THERMAL EFFECTS OF WIRELESS RADIATION RESULTING IN STRUCTURAL ISOMERISM IN THE YOUNG GIRLS INSULIN RECEPTORS? IS THE WIRELESS EXPOSURE BEHIND THE CURRENT OUT OF CONTROL EPIDEMIC OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME IN OUR ADOLESCENTS?
ARE THESE EMISSIONS HARDENING THE ZONA PELLUCIDA RENDERING IT IMPENETRABLE?
IS THIS BY DESIGN? IS THERE A STEALTH AGENDA TO AFFECT HUMAN FERTILITY?
ARE THE SCHOOLS INVOLVED?
ARE THE PARENTS INVOLVED BY LOADING THEIR HOMES UP WITH WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY THAT THE GOVERNMENT AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ASSURE THEM IS TOTALLY SAFE?
Remember these are our children, that they depend on us for protection and the future depends on them being protected. There will be no future if their reproductive future has been stolen from them. It is foolish to trust people you don’t know, in places so high and far away that you will never meet, about a danger that most people do not understand, that most people would never suspect, with what you and I and the rest of humanity has taken for granted for the last 6,000 years: our and our children’s reproductive capabilities. So many today pharmaceutically and prophylactically attempt control or thwart it. No one that I know, however, is ready to willingly relinquish it, much less surrender that of their children. Do not kid yourself folks. I believe that there are those in the highest positions of power that are hell bent on doing just that. It is flat out dangerous to think that the technology has not yet arrived to carry out the most insidious of agendas.
I think it is flat out shameful, to be a school official or a parent and willingly ignore all of this :http://thefullertoninformer.com/looky-here-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-devils-in-the-details/ because I believe if you do just that, it spells the beginning of the end of the line for what you and I once were:
Could this spell the end of what our kids will someday assume they were entitled to as a God given right? Will they ask us why we didn’t fight for it and for them? What then will you tell them my friends, what will you look them in the eyes and tell them? http://thefullertoninformer.com/what-is-wifi-doing-to-your-daughters/
Wireless technology DOES NOT BELONG IN THE CLASSROOM PERIOD! COMPUTERS CAN AND DO, AS LONG AS THEY ARE HARD WIRED.
I believe that of all the sins in the world, that cowardice is by far the worst of them all. It is because of this one that all the rest are allowed to flourish, spread and run their destructive course driving humanity right off the cliff into an abyss. Look at what is happening to our children’s minds with the music, TV, movies, video games and yes even some of the curriculum in the schools. The war for their souls being patently obvious, is already well underway. Right now ladies and gentlemen, this whole kit and kaboodle is on the line and hidden in plain view for all to see. Wake up and rescue your children and your family’s lineage. It will be 10-20 or even 25 years before you will know and by then it will be too late.
LAUSD just got soaked for over a billion dollars on this wireless waste and now 60 million a year will soon be needed to keep the microwave transmitters ticking away:
IS THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS? You decide for yourself.
OUR CHILDREN DESERVE BETTER
When learning of the issue of WiFi and wireless device health impacts, one of the first thoughts that often cross our minds is: “This can’t be possible that WiFi and these devices are harmful. Surely some governmental or health agency would have prevented this from happening.”
For many of us it just doesn’t make sense, because we assume that they couldn’t be that bad, otherwise “they” would have stopped it. One of the hardest things to realize is that many individuals, groups, and entities are actively blocking the public from learning about very serious health impacts affecting their communities from wireless technology.
Why would people do this? Don’t they realize that they are hurting their own children? Parents are busy, and they can’t spend hours upon hours doing scientific research. They therefore tend to base their decision on information that they consider trustworthy. Perhaps they will go on the web and read an article or two, or they will visit the World Health Organization’s website and read up. Not surprisingly, the most common approach is to ask someone who has a medical background, namely a nurse or doctor. In seems that in every school in which parents bring forth the issue of WiFi and wireless device health risks, certain figures manage to appear who will do everything in their power to block the process, and will fight tooth and nail to insist that wireless technology stays, even if it means presenting distorted and or false information to their communities. Usually this is a tech-savvy school board member, a technological integration specialist, or someone whose motivation is borne of his infatuation with gadgets. Sometimes it’s a school board member who doesn’t want the children to be left behind. In Fullerton California, it’s a medical doctor named Dr. Roman Schulze. Schulze, rather than actively engage in the scientific evidence, has been actively “war gaming” the issue of WiFi health effects. We know now why – he is defending his PTA wife and friends, so that they may then in turn defend their fundraising and other efforts to bring iPads into Acacia Elementary School.
Dr. Schulze has two primary weapons that he uses in his war games.
The first is a list of “systematic reviews” that he found at “EMF and Health” , http://www.emfandhealth.com/ a pro-industry website financed and put together by Canadian electronics mogul Lorne Trottier, who went so far as to hire professors and scientists to further his agenda.
Dr. Schulze’s second, and most widely employed weapon is to use diversions to take the focus away from the substantial, compelling, if not irrefutable scientific evidence that shows RF radiation to be unsafe for children. Just look back through the threads at Fullerton Informer, and you will see his almost endless efforts to distract and divert. Again, this is a “sport” for him, according to his very own wife, Michelle Garden. http://thefullertoninformer.com/insert-foot-in-mouth/#comment-25498
Distractions are one thing, but another thing completely is his use of the EMF and Health list of expert reviews. At first, this looks impressive enough (and that’s exactly why wireless industry executives devised it). Little do parents or other community members know how deeply manipulated and misleading it is. Unfortunately it probably fools most parents into thinking that WiFi is safe. Most aren’t experienced enough in the science to see the gaping flaws, and if they are being handed this information from a medical doctor, it would be natural for them to consider it trustworthy.
It’s not. There are so many holes in it so large that you could drive a truck through it.
I’ve been asked several times, what is the “smoking gun” of scientific research that proves wireless radiation to be unsafe. Often is this by moms who would like a way to explain the issue it to their pro-technology husbands.
The short answer is: There are several very large and well designed research projects that have found RF microwave radiation causes damage to DNA and other genetic material.
This is, by itself, very serious and compelling evidence, and enough to say no to placing wireless devices in the laps of children. There are some risks worth taking in life, but genetic mutation is not one of them. Not for a technological novelty. Never.
The first of these research programs was WTR, or the “Wireless Technology Research” project. A 7-year, $28 million dollar program of research conducted in the1990’s, and funded by the cell phone industry, this large scale project was a response to a high profile lawsuit, aired on Larry King Live, alleged cell phones caused the formation of a deadly brain tumor for a businessman.
As part of the WTR project, 200 scientists and medical doctors, under the direction of Dr. George Carlo, found that cell phone radiation caused DNA damage, leakage in the blood brain barrier, and a near tripling in the risk of brain tumors.
The second is ECOLOG, a multi-million dollar review of the state of the scientific research funded by T-Mobile in 2000. This review of over 220 peer-reviewed and published papers yielded strong indications that RF wireless radiation was genotoxic, and was able to cause single and double stranded DNA breaks and damage to chromosomes.
It also found substantial and compelling evidence that RF radiation disrupted other cellular processes, caused teratogenic effects (birth deformities), and caused loss of fertility in animal studies. Wireless radiation was also found to have cancer initiating and cancer promoting effects. Remember, this was from a study commissioned by T-Mobile, a mobile phone company.
The third of these large scale projects was “REFLEX” a $3 million, EU-funded research project conducted from 2000-2004 which studied the effects of wireless radiation on animal and human cells in the laboratory. Summarizing the work of 12 research groups in seven European countries, the end result was that high frequency microwave radiation causes genetic damage.
In summary, three large scale research projects from 1993-2004 that all found RF radiofrequency microwave radiation causes genetic damage. Subsequent research was released and continues to be published that confirms and expands these earlier findings.
The Bioinitiative Report 2012 now lists hundreds of studies that show EMR electromagnetic radiation to cause genetic effects. For those of you unfamiliar with the Bioinitiative Report, there is a reason it is so unpopular with the wireless industry. A group of experts from around the world, many of whom were at the top of their fields, worked together in order to lay out the evidence for the public to see.
Bioinitiative Report: Evidence for effects on Gene and Protein Expression
Bioinitiative Report: Evidence for Genotoxic Effects
So now back to Dr. Schulze’s document from EMF and Health, http://www.emfandhealth.com/Science%20Sources.html which collectively states that there is no credible evidence of harm from WiFi. Taking a closer look, let’s shine the light of the evidence from the above research on this document and see how it stands up.
One of the extractions is of The Swedish Radiation Authority 2008. It states:
“…two studies on genotoxicity report no increase in micronuclei or DNA strand breaks after RF exposure.”
Two studies. Does this sound like a comprehensive assessment of the science of genetic effects? What about the $28 million research project WTR, ECOLOG, or the $3 million REFLEX project, that reported genetic damage? No mention of these of course. This is industrial cherry picking at its finest.
This Swedish Radiation Authority excerpt suggests that two new studies (from pre 2008), somehow negate all the other studies before and after that report RF exposure causes DNA damage. That’s not how science works. Two studies do not “poof” make all the other evidence somehow disappear. EMF and Health, however, would like you to think that it does, and yet the unsuspecting parent would never know this.
Another example is: Radiofrequency Toolkit for Environmental Health Practioners, BC Center for Disease Control. Here’s what the folks at EMF and Health chose to highlight from this report:
“The report notes that “several recent international reports” such as “the UK Health Protection Agency (2012) and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (2012), among others, have published major reviews of RF and its potential effect on health; both agencies concluded that there is little evidence of adverse impacts on the health of the general population by RF”.”
It would appear from this excerpt that wireless technology was found to be safe, but this is far from the case, as the actual BC CDC document mentions numerous biological and health impacts.
Not mentioned in the Expert Review is that the BC CDC document states that “the epidemiological studies of men assessed for infertility were consistent in demonstrating decreased sperm motility associated with increased use of mobile phones” and “biological effects on sperm motility related to RF Exposure”.
Also left out is that the review panel noted that “oxidative stress seems one of the more plausible mechanisms of RF-induced sperm damage. Mechanisms by which oxidative stress is caused by increased ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) and decreased antioxidant have been shown to exist in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.”
Here are several other excerpts from the BC CDC expert review that the folks at EMF and Health failed to share:
Page 75, Section 6B
“For the same emitted power, children and fetuses experience higher SAR.”
Page 62, Section 5
“Whole body exposure at frequencies in the range of 80 to 180 MHZ and 1-4 GHZ to ICNIRP exposure levels may expose children and small persons (shorter than 1.3m) to above acceptable ICNIRP SAR levels.”
Page 138, Section 6B
“Mortality higher in RF-exposed groups than in control groups at SAR 0.5W/kg.”
Page 144-145, Section 6B
“Ferreira and colleagues exposed pregnant Wistar rats to 834 MHz RF signal for 8.5 hours from gestation to birth at SAR values of 0.55 – 1.23 W/kg or sham. At birth, the animals were sacrificed and an increased level of micronucleus formation was seen in the bone marrow of RF exposed versus sham—exposed animals.”
Page 260, Section 10
“The investigators found a dose-dependent response for all tested parameters including sperm motility and vitality. Decreased motility and increased levels of ROS were found in exposed specimens …..as a dose-response effect was found, it would seem there is biological and clinical relevance to their findings.”
Page 144, Section 6B
“On examination of brain tissue immediately after exposure, an increase in both single- and double-strand DNA breaks were seen in the animals exposed to pulsed or continuous wave RF compared to sham-exposed rats.”
Page 157, Section 6B
“Research on effects on behaviour and cognition are mixed, with several studies showing that RF exposure has an adverse effect.”
Page 150, Section 6B
“Examination revealed increased permeation of albumin from capillaries into both white and grey brain matter in RF –exposed rats by comparison with sham-exposed animals, suggesting that exposure to pulsed RF fields at around 900 MHz increases permeability of the blood-brain barrier. They also observed an increase in “dark neurons,” indicators of neuronal damage in rat brains in animals exposed to RF fields.”
Page 165, Section 6B
“The results of the two studies, while quite “soft,” suggest that more attention needs to be paid to very long-term effects of RF-EMF. Although it is impossible to suggest a biologic mechanism which might explain the findings, results of both studies described above suggest that lifelong exposure to RF fields may shorten lifespan, perhaps in conjunction with other factors, at least in animals.”
Page 257, Section 10
“Mean sperm motility, viability and normal morphology showed significant adverse effects in the mobile phone user groups, both in men with normal and abnormal sperm counts. A dose-response relationship was found as the assessed semen parameters declined with increasing mobile phone use, independent of the quality of the original sample.”
Page 153 -154, Section 6B
“Analysis of tissue from the several parts of the brain, namely the prefrontal cortex, cerebellar cortex and dendate gyrus at three and 10 days post-exposure indicated elevated levels of GFAP, suggesting that the RF exposure was having a physiological effect, at least on astrocytic cells in the central nervous system.”
Page 152, Section 6B
“Sirav and Seyhan (2011) completed a similar study to their earlier investigation, again in Wistar albino rats, and once again found that the exposure to 900 or 1800 MHZ RF fields for 20 minutes promoted a significant increase in albumin in the brains of male rats by comparison with sham-exposed animals.”
Page 154, Section 6B
“Bas et al (2009) exposed Wistar rats to continuously modulated 900 MHz GSM signal (SAR 2.0 W/kg) or sham for one hour per day for 28 days and found a significant decrease in pyramidal cells in the brain of the exposed rats by comparison with sham-exposed animals. Pyramidal cells are thought to play an important role in cognitive functioning.”
Page 250, Section 10
“Unlike the mixed findings found in occupation health studies of radar EMF exposures, the epidemiological studies of men assessed for infertility ere consistent in demonstrating decreased sperm motility associated with increased use of mobile phones. “
Page 259, Section 10
“Sperm motility and viability were negatively affected by exposure to RF.”
Page 275, Summary, Section 10
“The balance of all evidence, animal and human, is consistent with the assertion that exposure of the testes to mobile phone RF may be associated with decreased sperm count, motility, concentration and altered morphology.”
Adverse Effects identified, Mechanisms of Harm suggested
Page 272, Section 10
“Overall, oxidative stress seems one of the more plausible mechanisms of RF-induced sperm damage. It has been found fairly consistently in human and animal studies on sperm specifically and on other cells in general. Mechanisms by which oxidative stress is caused by increased ROS and decreased antioxidant have been shown to exist in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimers.”
Page 269-270, Section 10
“Non-enzyme antioxidants, like melatonin, have also been observed to decline after RF exposure 62-65 An additive effect may occur, with alternation not only of sperm cell enzymes but of whole body system antioxidants. Melatonin in particular is known to support antioxidant activity in sperm. 66 A number of recent studies have provided experimental evidence suggestive of an oxidative stress mechanism for the effect of RF on sperm.”
Page 270, Section 10
“It was determined that the ROS were sourced from the sperms’ mitochondria. At a SAR of 2.8 W/kg, the results became statistically significant for mitochondrially produced ROS. They noted specifically that rapid change occurred at low SAR exposures which reached a plateau when about 30% of sperm affected.”
Page 263, Section 10
“Most, although not all studies attempting to control temperature, convincingly ruled out a thermal effect.”
Page 273, Section 10
“It is known that RF can induce currents in a cell membrane, and that this may alter the cation (positive ion) distribution (and so charge) in the normally negative membrane. Some evidence shows pulsed RF can dislodge calcium ions (Ca++) from a membrane, resulting in a weaker barrier and leakage, although there is no direct evidence on sperm membranes. However, studies do seem to point to efflux of Ca++ as a factor in altered sperm motility.”
Page 340, Section 13
“The most effective way to reduce total exposure to RF is to avoid the use of RF-emitting devices, especially devices that result in the highest personal exposures such as mobile phones used at the head.”
These biological and health effects are not what I would call safe. As a parent, of course I would want to know if wireless technology was shown to cause DNA damage, infertility, neurological and behavior changes, leakage of the blood brain barrier, and other radiation damage.
I believe that to omit these details is highly misleading if not fraudulent, and although Schulze has been warned of serious errors in this document since September of 2013, he continues to present it to the public, falsely stating that it provides evidence as to the safety of microwave radiation exposure onto their children.
Young children cannot look after themselves. They look to parents, teachers, principals, and other school administrators to make sure they are safe. They expect that medical experts will do their due diligence and protect them from environmental hazards. The last thing they expect is that a local medical doctor could be playing games with their children’s physical, mental and reproductive health.
This is what I believe is on the line folks. Look very carefully at this photo:
So what are the parents of the 15,000 children in The Fullerton School District to do with this information? I believe that you can all answer that question yourselves. They are your children ladies and gentlemen.
So what is Dr. Roman A. Schulze to do with all of this information? Good question. Let’s hear what this IPad, WiFi, wireless radiation defending extraordinaire woman known as his wife, Michele Garden has to say:
“My husband, Roman Shulze, and I, Michele Garden, just plain ol’ don’t agree with your assertions. We, along with a majority of the parents, the Physics Dept. at CSUF, and a WHOLE LOTTA other scientists and citizens think that you are wrong. We are tired of the minority forcing their views on the majority” http://thefullertoninformer.com/insert-foot-in-mouth/#comment-25498
This statement along with her latest email to the Fullerton Informer aside from being absolutely stunning, is a field day in the making for the advocates of free speech and our children’s health and well being. So once again, she tries to make it all about Joe Imbriano and my assertions? Sorry Charlie or should I say Charlette, no cigar.
So what are all these people that she mentions to do with this information? Boy now that’s a tough one. She has certainly put the physics dept over at Cal State Fullerton in the basket now too. I guess they are in good company with the likes of of Robert Pletka, Robert Craven, Karen Whisnant, George Giokaris, Jennifer Williams, Greg Dhuyvetter from the Diocese of Orange, both the entire FSD and FJUHSD school boards, and the host of all of the other teachers, principals, and administrators who flat out continue to IGNORE these health concerns we continue to present on this issue who are just rolling this ball right along and REFUSE TO TURN THESE EMISSIONS SYSTEMS OFF and continue to forcibly irradiate the children.
This issue is a big deal ladies and gentlemen, a big big deal. In my humble opinion, there is no larger threat to humanity than this issue. You can choose to ignore it or you can choose to face it head on.
Remember these things? Like wireless today, advertisements for this so called “necessity” once blanketed the television and radio airwaves, billboards, movies, magazines, and sporting events for decades. They used to be in almost every home, car, plane, train, bus, restaurant, school, hospital, park, mall, airport, backyard, porch, movie theater and everywhere else humans went? Sound familiar?
Remember who told us it was safe?
Acacia PTA, Fullerton parents and the rest of you parents around the world that read this, will we ever learn? Will you still listen when they say “trust me, I’m a doctah” Remember these are our children, that they depend on us for protection and the future depends on them being protected. There will be no future if their reproductive future has been stolen from them. It is foolish to trust people you don’t know, in places so high and far away that you will never meet, about a danger that most people do not understand, that most people would never suspect, with what you and I and the rest of humanity has taken for granted for the last 6,000 years: our and our children’s reproductive capabilities. So many today pharmaceutically and prophylactically attempt control or thwart it. No one that I know, however, is ready to willingly relinquish it, much less surrender that of their children. Do not kid yourself folks. There are those in the highest positions of power that are hell bent on doing just that. It is flat out dangerous to think that the technology has not yet arrived to carry out the most insidious of agendas.
I think it is flat out shameful, to be a parent and to willingly ignore all of this because I believe if you do just that, it spells the beginning of the end of the line for what you and I once were:
Could this spell the end of what our kids will someday assume they were entitled to as a God given right? Will they ask us why we didn’t fight for it and for them? What then will you tell them my friends, what will you look them in the eyes and tell them?
In closing, I would like to state that I believe that of all the sins in the world, that cowardice is by far the worst of them all. It is because of this one that all the rest are allowed to flourish, spread and run their destructive course driving humanity right off the cliff into an abyss. Look at what is happening to our children’s minds with the music, TV, movies, video games and yes even some of the curriculum in the schools. The war for their souls being patently obvious, is already well underway. Right now ladies and gentlemen, this whole kit and kaboodle is on the line and hidden in plain view for all to see. Now is not the time to treat the debate over your children’s physical and reproductive health as some sort of a sport, much less trust anyone who I believe has been publicly identified as one who I believe appears to enjoy doing just that. Thank you.
I had originally posted this on 3-27-13 but decided to pull it. However, I feel now is the time for this side of the story to be told. I have added some revisions to bring it up to date with respect to recent developments in our quest to end the largest radiation and medical experiment on children by a trillion dollar industry that the world has ever seen, AND HOW AND WHY IT NEEDS TO COME TO AN END. What originally began as a quest to get the WiFi systems out of my children’s Fullerton School District classrooms has led to a miraculous hope-that is to prevent newborn and infant children from becoming Autistic and a remarkable hypothesis-the possible connection of pulse modulated microwave EMF emissions’ interactions with metals that result in demyelination of neurons, mitochondrial DNA damage resulting in disruption of methylation pathways, the involvement of immunizations, umbilical cord clampings at birth and the role a certain form of iron plays in all of this unfolding epidemic of Autism.
In the summer of 1983, I was working in a fast food restaurant while I was in high school. It was my lunch time and I wanted to reheat my burger from earlier that I didn’t have time to finish. Foolishly, I put it in the microwave in its shiny foil wrapper. I pushed the power button and what happened next, I will never forget. The dielectric breakdown of air, as a result of tremendous voltage spikes (roughly equal to 3,000,000 volts per meter) and the resulting high concentrations of electric charge on the metal wrapper, generated by the magnetron in the microwave oven, was glowing blue and white right in front of my very eyes. 30 years later, I bring this up to demonstrate what we all know TO BE TRUE, that microwaving certain metals is dangerous.
Pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation levels that we are all exposed to today in the frequency ranges that approach, equal or exceed the frequency at which the maximum dielectric loss of water occurs are in some cases trillions of times the levels that we and our parents were exposed to as children. These emissions are three dimensional and penetrate every cubic nanometer of our beings and every cell of our bodies, including the unborn. Nothing humanity has ever been faced with before can rival the pervasiveness of this threat to all of our health, especially the most vulnerable among us, the unborn and the young. Although the levels of radiation drop off inversely proportionately with distance, you must realize just how close these transmitters are to the unborn and the infants are being utilized. Look around.
Certain metals, depending on what particular frequency of the electromagnetic spectrum they are exposed to, such as BASF_Carbonyl_Iron_Powder_
The brain contains about 100 billion neurons and the intestine contains roughly 100 million. Both the gut and the brain are where Autistic children show abnormalities. I firmly believe that both the gut and the brain are being affected by the microwave EMF emissions that have become increasingly prevalent in our lives.
Autism is a term used to describe a broad spectrum of brain disorders. It is a complex diagnosis, and rightfully so as I believe that many children that receive the Autism diagnosis are really suffering brain and intestinal injuries as a result of several factors. The predominant mechanism that I believe is driving the Autism rates into orbit is discussed at length in this article and that is pulse modulated microwave EMF emissions acting upon metals creating voltage discharges which disrupt the colonization process of the intestinal flora by selectively killing off specific strains that would normally be present, demyelinating neurons in the brain, destroying glial cells, specifically astrocytes and interrupting methylation pathways by damaging mitochondrial DNA, in an environment which exposes the unborn and infants to unprecedented levels of these microwave emissions. No generation throughout human history has ever been faced with this.
The other significant, equally contributing, driving forces behind the Autism epidemic are the contents of the battery of childhood immunizations, not limited to the MMR vaccine, and premature umbilical cord clampings at birth and are discussed towards the conclusion of this article.
We know that Autism is a brain disorder. The fact is that the brain is an electrical system. I believe that the current explosion in the current Autism epidemic is an electrical problem. Microwaves which are electromagnetic waves containing energy. These waves of energy, because of their specific properties, are most readily absorbed by waters and fats. Myelin which is the insulation of the neurons, has the highest cholesterol content of any part of the body with a 70% fat composition. The brain is 90% water and fats. These voltage discharges in the presence of metals when coupled with the known demyelinating effects of the mercury exposure that children are being subjected to from immunizations simply compounds the epidemic. As long as the MMR vaccine continues to be administered in its present form, there have and will clearly continue to be demyelination as a direct result of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis from the MMR vaccine which involves a separate mechanism that operates irrespective of the EMF emissions and does cause Autism. Sadly, even if the mercury (thimerisol) is removed from the immunizations, the mechanism will remain in place and the explosion of Autism will continue to increase, as I will go into more detail on later, because the mercury exposure is simply being substituted or replaced by ever increasing levels of microwave radiation exposure reacting with other vaccine components. That is precisely what is being observed, the rates keep going up.
The following article explains the observations found in an Autistic brain. http://www.upi.com/Health_
In what I have written in this article here before you today, I am providing the mechanism which I believe that which has long since been observed is sadly being accomplished.
Sometimes something so simple can remain hidden in plain view either by accident or by design. You be the judge of that. I believe that the elusiveness of this foe called Autism facing this generation is about to come to an abrupt end if the medical and scientific communities can muster the integrity and courage to address these causes and rethinks their symbiotic, predatorial relationships with the drug companies. Ironically, I believe that it appears that the missing link in this mystery has been hiding right under our noses, in our homes, workplaces and now, it is heading right for our children’s classrooms and their laps.
Is there a link between the prevalence of microwave emission bombardment of populations, anemia and Autism? Sources of microwave EMF emissions like microwave ovens, wireless security systems, wireless baby monitors,cell phones, cell towers, microwave antenna arrays, WiFi routers, repeaters, wireless tablets, laptops, cordless phones, wireless printers, wireless tower computers, wireless mouses, wireless TV’s, wireless DVR’s, children’s video gaming consoles (EVEN WHEN THEY ARE TURNED OFF THEY EMIT UNLESS THE UNIT IS UNPLUGGED), wireless gaming controllers, smart meters and the ubiquitous hidden RF modules litter the landscape like broken bottles did in the empty lots when I was a kid growing up. We knew all too well to stay away from the glistening sharp pieces all over the place back then. Why then, are we so drawn to these black box hazards today? Oh they color some of them white but nonetheless, they are still like jagged pieces of broken glass all over the fields when I was a kid. These things are sources of damaging emissions. This can no longer be ignored. The researchers need to start looking where they should, not where they are being directed by the powers that be.
When did you get your first microwave oven? How about your first cell or cordless phone, around 1993? How about WiFi, around 1998? When did the smart meter end up outside your bedroom? Now when did you get your wireless tablets, laptops, TVs, dvr’s, video game systems, controllers, printers, and security systems? Listen, cell towers are bad, but believe it or not, microwave EMF levels are much higher in your home. They are even much greater in high density housing and what is most disturbing is the EMF levels in wireless classrooms. Most workplace levels are much higher than one might think as well. One in 50 O.C. kids have Autism? Could it be even higher? Will the numbers go higher? I believe they will. Please hear me out on this folks. Expecting mothers and vulnerable sub populations: You are being bathed in these emissions.
When I came upon the following Wall Street Journal article during my daily read, which at face value, appeared to be very confusing, I realized that if I read between the lines, that it provided 2 key points about Autism: the possible cause and the possible solution.
I had been doing extensive research on the effects of microwave EMF emissions on various metals as related to my need to clearly understand the interactions of the classroom WiFi networks’ and WiFi enabled devices’ emissions with items in the classroom and the children present. What I discovered was rather remarkable. I read over a study on asphalt mixes. When carbonyl iron was added to an asphalt mix during the manufacturing process, it increased the microwave absorption by 15X as opposed to plain asphalt. I remembered that carbonyl iron was commonly taken as an iron supplement. I could not believe my eyes. So the following research paper on asphalt manufacturing also fits into the puzzle:
This simplified snippet explains how the metals possibly get into the brain and remember that the brain controls the gut:
Anemia shows up in almost all of Autistic children :
So there must be something going on with iron levels or something is happening to the iron such as bone marrow incorporation as a result of EMF exposure. There are some simple explanations as to why the iron and ferritin levels are not where they should be in the newborn and infants besides heredity. The first cause comes from the lack of available iron or folate in the womb where the mother’s diet is deficient in folates as well as elemental iron. Consequently, so becomes the developing child. The important link between folates and anemia is that when folates are present, it aids the production of healthy red blood cells which help transport oxygen throughout the body. Anemia develops with the lack iron and of folates in the body due to the lack of production of healthy red blood cells. Folate levels and anemia could very well be connected if an individual has a hard time absorbing this B vitamin through regular dietary intake and has a greater need for this vitamin. Pernicious anemia results from eating poorly nutritious foods, microwaved foods, and alcohol consumption, especially during pregnancy as these upset this balance. It can be noted that iron levels can rise quite easily through the supplementation of folates and iron. It is very simple to remedy.
In the brain, there is a certain type of cells that are largely responsible for distributing iron in the brain as they posses transporters for several forms of iron. They are a type of glial cells called astrocytes which help make up the blood brain barrier. Under normal circumstances, astrocytes can accumulate and hold large amounts of iron. This is where the shielding properties of elemental iron (a known microwave absorber) are naturally employed by the body in protecting the developing brain from the EMF microwave bombardment in or out of the womb from wireless radiation emissions. This prevents the microwave energy’s interaction with metals that would otherwise create the damaging voltage discharges to the neurons and the mitochondrial DNA. Not only does the iron they hold protect the developing brain from the EMF emissions, but the iron stored in the astrocytes actually protects the astrocytes themselves from the wireless bombardment. The astrocytes also regulate the transmission of electrical impulses within the brain and are are responsible for the promotion of the myelinating activity. In an environment where our bodies are replete with wireless microwave radiation exposure, without an adequate intake of the proper forms of iron, the astrocytes are doomed and with them go all of their protective and regulatory functions. In this environment, the voltage discharges in the presence of metals and other compounds, continue unabated in their negatively influencing the insulation properties of the neurons and destruction of mitochondrial DNA. Low iron equals no or low EMF protection period!
There is much published regarding Voltage-gated calcium channels and their involvement in Autism. As they mediate calcium influx in response to membrane depolarization, one would expect these pathways to be disrupted by the voltage discharges in the absence of proper iron levels in the presence of certain metals that exposure to EMF/RF emissions in and out of the womb induce. I believe that this is the mechanism by which this is accomplished and it clearly explains what is observed in the medical literature.
I wanted to briefly mention a particularly inhumane and common procedure in childbirth that has always deeply concerned me. I believe that it is primarily driven by obstetricians and hospital staff in general who are simply following hospital protocols designed in large part to comply with malpractice insurance requirements. Largely focusing on the slight risk of hemmorrage, ironically, the obstetricians appear to be clueless or willfully ignorant of any danger to the newborn incurred by it. More often than not as of late it is necessitated as a result of the pharmacological agents being routinely administered upon admission such as pitocin. It occurs during term deliveries. It is the routine medical practice of clamping the pulsating umbilical cord shortly after delivery of the child which I believe is a form of asphyxia. It interrupts the placental oxygenation and delays the pulmonary oxygenation. This lack of oxygen to specific areas of the brain, caused by lack of proper blood flow to the respective capillaries is also involved. This is something I personally strongly oppose and I never had done with any of my four children. The following links are of interest:
Cord clamping stops the placental transfer of blood dead in its tracks at a crucial moment in the newborns life right as the changeover to breathing through the lungs takes place as the umbilical delivery of oxygen ceases. This clearly substantially lowers blood volume and iron stores in the newborn as well as results in hypoxia. The lack of available oxygen, blood and iron at that crucial moment, I believe, sets the stage for anemia, and a myriad of other conditions. With respect to Autism, I believe that cord clamping plays a role as it has been implicated in causing anemia in the newborn, and anemia has been demonstrated to be a common denominator in almost all Autistic children. Of course at times, cord occlusion naturally occurs as well and simply cannot be avoided. However, I believe that umbilical cord clamping prior to the cessation of the pulsing cord and delivery of the placenta should always be avoided if at all possible. After both of the lungs are functioning, the cord vessels close reflexively on their own. There is no need to prematurely intervene. What must come to mind is that no newborn can absorb iron from dietary iron intake. Cord clamping robs the newborn of up to 50% of its blood volume and with it the iron. For the first few months of life, the newborn can only use what it has stored. This creates an infant who will be susceptible to the damaging effects of EMF emissions in their environment as their brains continue to develop without the protection that normal iron stores would have afforded.
Almost without exception, women upon arrival to the hospital are administered a drug called Pitocin to induce labor. This is done to speed the delivery and minimize the hospital stay. I have studied the apparent link between Autism and Pitocin administration as it has also been alleged to have some involvement in Autism:
I, however, arrive at a very different conclusion. Pitocin (oxytocin) has been around for decades. I believe that what is actually being observed in those studies, is that in all term deliveries where Pitocin is administered, due to hospital protocol, the cord is immediately clamped and not delayed at all. We believe that it is the asphyxia and anemia inducement in the newborn caused by immediate cord clamping that is really driving the perceived Pitocin involvement in Autism and not the physiological actions of Pitocin. I firmly believe that for the most part, with the exception the vaccine induced events, Autism is primarily a disease of electromagnetic exposures. The effects of the microwave radiation on the physiology of an unborn child or infant whose iron stores are not sufficient to combat the ongoing microwave EMF bombardment by iron’s microwave EMF absorptive properties and the subsequent net effect of EMF shielding of the sensitive developing brain are disastrous. The observed associations with induced labor were particularly pronounced in male children. If the EMF exposure is the real culprit, then the boys would be most affected and susceptible in an anemic environment because they have a thinner blood brain barrier.
Another cause of the infant being anemic is the prevalence of Cesarean section procedures which clearly reduce blood volumes of the newborn and consequently lower iron stores. So again we must remember that the majority of Autistic children are deficient in iron.
There is a higher incidence of Autism in children of diabetic mothers. Anemia is a well known common complication of diabetes.
Autism has been linked to pregnant women who took psychiatric medications. These medications most commonly cause aplastic anemia:
There are many studies that link Autism to pesticide and chemical exposure. Pesticide and chemical exposures lead to anemia:
There are studies that link obesity to Autism:
Fats more readily absorb microwaves.
Anemia is very common in obese expecting mothers:
There are many studies that link Autism to living near freeways.
The air pollution levels in this country have been on the decline for decades. When I was growing up, my lungs commonly hurt, my eyes burned and you could see, feel and taste the pollution. What do you find near freeways? Pollution of course but what kind? Metals from brake dust, particulate matter from exhaust, and noxious gases. They have been around forever. I grew up and lived for 30 years within 1000 feet of a freeway. No one in my neighborhood with hundreds of children within a stone’s throw had Autism. What do we find near freeways today? You will find a plethora of microwave emitting cell towers, antenna arrays, and high density housing with large amounts of people who spend most of their time indoors exposed to EMF from closed quarter contact with multiple WiFi routers, wireless computers, laptops, tablets, wireless phones, microwave ovens, wireless gaming systems from multiple families all in close proximity to each other.
The next interesting piece in this puzzle was in the recent W.S.J article that found that women exposed to high levels of air pollution had a 40%-50% higher incidence of autistic children. Polluted air contains some quantities of metals. It got me thinking about smoggy places and I realized that where the air is the most polluted. Air pollution is prevalent in a majority of large metropolitan areas. Large metropolitan areas have high density housing as well as high density office buildings with residents that spend very little time outdoors. These high density housing and workplace settings expose the occupants to very high levels of microwave EMF emissions by virtue of the fact that almost every conceivable housing unit and office has at least one if not multiple smart meters, microwave ovens, WiFi routers, laptops, video gaming systems, tablets, and cordless phone base stations blasting through all of the paper thin walls 24/ 7 both at home and at work, conceivably exposing the inhabitants to potentially much higher levels of microwave radiation than anyone realizes. Add into the equation, the lack of outdoor areas to spend time away from the EMF emissions. Multiply the number of paper thin walled housing or office units times the power level of the typical router and then add the EMF exposure from the proliferation of cell towers in large cities, the household or workplace use of tablets, laptops, microwave ovens and even occupational WiFi and WiFi enabled device exposure and you have massive microwave EMF exposure. The effects of RF exposure ares cumulative. Take an EMF meter outside and drive by an apartment building or office building and you will get almost the same readings as if you were driving by a cell tower.
So what about the environmental pollution’s connection to Autism?http://www.ncbi.nlm.
What about mercury? http://www.
We believe that this is how these puzzle pieces fit together to solve the mystery of how electromagnetically induced Autism can be prevented: Carbonyl iron is a common form of iron prescribed and can be taken in supplement form. Carbonyl iron is a pure form of iron that is widely used as a food additive and has been widely utilized for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. When ingested, it requires gastric acid from the stomach to become soluble. Gastric acid converts the carbonyl iron to ferrous iron, and once this happens, it is absorbed in the same manner as ferrous iron. Because carbonyl iron absorption is dependent upon gastric acid for absorption, it is less toxic and better tolerated than other forms of iron.
There have been studies published that actually implicate excess iron as being involved in mitochondrial dysfunction. Compounds such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) are often found in diseases involving oxidative stress and elevated iron levels which has been postulated to be a possible contributing factor in Autism. This involves the Fenton reaction in which certain forms of excess iron play a role in the production of free radicals in the presence of EMF. Carbonyl or elemental iron does not contribute to this sequence of events as the body’s natural metabolic functions will properly regulate the iron levels and excess amounts will be excreted. The elemental iron cannot possible be converted to the Ferrous form unless the well regulated gastric acid conversion allows it to be.
The common forms of iron in our diet are non heme forms.Non-heme iron is not absorbed by the body as well as heme iron. Only 2 – 20% of non-heme iron that is consumed is absorbed, which by the way, are already in the ferrous form and readily elevate iron levels if daily dosage is exceeded. You cannot dump the finished product (non heme Ferrous iron) into the body and not expect there to be elevated blood iron levels much like you cannot expect to dump glucose directly into the body and not expect elevated blood glucose to be present. The Fenton reactions are being driven by excessive dietary intake and excessive blood levels of the wrong forms of iron which lack EMF absorption properties. What would normally block EMF/RF emissions’ exposures cannot occur if iron levels are not under proper metabolic regulation. The solution is to eat properly and if supplementation is absolutely necessary, then carbonyl iron should the exclusive candidate for such. Carbonyl iron’s gastric acid dependence on absorption ensures blood levels remain where they should. Is it possible to remain anemic even with iron supplementation? Of course it is if you continue to take the wrong forms that are not readily absorbed. Is this possibly another reason Autism and anemia are connected? I believe so.
Why did the W.S.J. study above indicate a 40% reduction in the prevalence of autism among women who took iron supplements before and during pregnancy? WE BELIEVE THAT THE EMF EMISSIONS IN the microwave range of 900 MHz to the 2.45 GHz frequencies are THE CULPRIT by opening the blood brain barrier of the unborn or infant child while in the womb when the threshold of power necessary is much lower and out of the womb, which by the way, is thinner in boys than in girls. These electromagnetic emissions in the presence of metals that have been allowed into the brain become contact points for these microwave emissions to create electrical discharges which in turn demyelinate the neurons, and damage the mitochondrial DNA. Also, female brains are more adept at making and produce better better myelin than males. These two factors, in my opinion, explain why boys are at much greater risk for autism, ADHD and other similarly routed problems.
That is what is observed here: http://www.upi.com/
Blood brain barrier is affected by microwave emissions:
The womb amplifies the emissions and the multiple EMF exposures due to the high density housing and workplace arrangement could potentially create enough power to open the BBB in the developing child. I am not aware of any studies on what power levels would be required to open the BBB of a child in the womb. I believe with all the aforementioned, that is what is indeed happening to the developing child. The same interactions can occur in the newborn after birth as a result of being present in the same environment of staggering levels of invisible EMF emissions. I believe that the well documented actions of EMF microwave emissions creating electrical discharges and voltage spikes on certain metals, that in addition, allow metals and toxins to get in to the brain by opening the BBB channels, are also simultaneously causing damaging voltage spikes and electrical discharge on the metals present in the brain and in the gut. It is this firework show at the cellular level, that I believe is interfering with the production of or even destroying the myelin sheathing of the neurons in the brain, damaging the mitochondrial DNA and decimating specific strains of the intestinal flora yielding the imbalances that are almost always present in Autistic children. When you overload a wire with too much current or too much voltage what happens to the insulation on the wire? What happens when the insulation is damaged and the power is still on? Myelin is the neuron’s insulator. I believe that this cascading sequence of events results in the ensuing brain neuronal demyelination, mitochondrial DNA damage yeilding methlyation pathway disruption and the shortening of Perkinje cells. This is what I believe is causing the ever increasing non- MMR vaccine induced cases of Autism. I believe that removing the unborn child or infant from exposure to microwave EMF emissions both occupationally and in the home environments, Carbonyl Iron supplementation during pregnancy, CAREFULLY MONITORING THE MOTHER’S IRON LEVELS AND MAINTAINING THEM WITH CARBONYL IRON, avoiding unnecessary C sections and delaying umbilical cord clamping, and monitoring iron levels in the newborn child, limiting metal exposures, and avoiding thimerisol in vaccines, and the MMR vaccine with its subacute sclerosing panencephalitis side effect can stop this epidemic in its tracks.
What about the correlation between placental inclusions and Autism?:
I suspect that the placenta being a window to the baby, has suffered the same effects of the microwave EMF bombardment in the presence of metals in an anemic environment that the developing baby has. The study does not correlate iron levels with the prevalence of these placentas with trophoblast inclusions. I believe anemia and EMF exposure is a common denominator in all of those women. It is known that 2.45 Ghz emissions have been demonstrated to alter gene expression in human cells via a non thermal mechanism:
Could this placental inclusion phenomenon simply be a signature of EMF exposure in the presence of metals in anemic expecting mothers? I believe that it is.
What about the recent study that connects Autism to in vitro fertilization procedures? ”A perhaps more unexpected finding was an increased risk for both autism and mental retardation after treatment of more severe and not very common cases of male infertility”-from http://www.
Maybe the massive decrease in male fertility is a direct result from the constant EMF exposure from the high tech wireless lifestyle that exists at work and in the home damaging the fathers sperm and sending the father to the fertility doctor in the first place. http://synapse.
Aside from the EMF induced degeneration of the oocyte, there remains a more serious concern. Like all microwave irradiated cells in your body, specifically the oocytes in the female ovaries, they all inherently struggle to protect themselves against the microwave emissions’ electromagnetically induced dissonance by hardening their membranes. I believe that in the case of the oocyte, the zona pellucida hardens rendering it impermeable and thus results in human female infertility. In vitro fertilization would forcilby penetrate the hardened zona pellucida. This could be another reason that the perceived rare in vitro procedure is being associated with Autism. So I believe that the wireless radiation environment in the home or work that is causing the fertility problems in the first place with the female or the male, remains the driving force in what is mistakenly being blamed on the fertility procedure. Once the woman conceives, she goes back to her home or job where the wireless radiation no longer simply acts on her eggs, but now begins acting on the fetus and continues to act on the infant after birth.
So maybe it is the EMF exposure to the mother in the home and/or at work that is what is actually damaging the developing child’s brain inside the mother’s womb and not the in alleged in-vitro fertilization procedure at all.
Studies have shown that mothers who eat a diet rich in folic acid such as dark leafy greens have been found to have a much lower offspring rate of Autism incidence as well. I believe that it is the foods that are rich in folates which reduces the incidence of anemia, are also rich in IRON that produces the ideal microwave EMF protection.
We believe that the damage to the children’s brain and digestive tract both in and out of the womb is accomplished via this mechanism of EMF electrical discharge in the presence of metals in the absence of the proper form of iron and iron levels that absorb or attenuate instead of amplify microwave EMF emissions in the anemic expecting mother, her unborn child and later in the infant. It has been widely suspected, in addition to the W.S.J. article’s recent connection, that the presence of metals and pollution is a possible contributor to autism.
In this recent article : autistic children and gut flora, it shows that a rare imbalance in intestinal flora are present both in the mother and the Autistic child. I believe this is a telltale sign of both the mother and the developing child in the womb sharing excessive levels of microwave EMF exposure both in the home and the workplace, not genetics. The following article explains that low power exposure to microwave radiation can selectively destroy certain strains of bacteria in the presence of certain metals: http://www.
I believe, like the inorganic metallic compounds in your fireworks, that they need a spark of energy to turn on the neurological and ensuing gastrointestinal damaging mechanism. In the case of the sparkler, it could be a match, and in the case of Autism it could be a microwave emission source acting upon the metals that begins the damaging processes. This would explain why, up until the recent advent of the wireless age of microwave emission bombardment on a wide scale, Autism was not on the map but rather a blip on the radar. We know that microwaves alone can exert non-thermal effects in biological systems, at least partially arising from alterations in the conformation of cellular proteins:
Once the extremely delicate balance of intestinal flora has been altered by electromagnetic bombardment, compromised immunity and digestive disorders run their ensuing destructive course. This syndrome is not the same as the retardations of the past caused by poor nutrition, birthing complications or genetic abnormalities.
It is widely accepted medical fact that Anemia is a common denominator in almost all Autistic children. Why? This is extremely important. The role of iron is crucial to understanding the puzzle. I believe what has eluded researchers for a decade is right here in the next paragraph.
It is widely known that certain compounds exist that are Radar Absorbing Materials or RAM like those used on the Stealth Bomber. There is a wide array of magnetically radar absorbing material or mag-RAM as well as EMI suppression materials, or surface wave absorbers available for purchase online if you are interested. You can also purchase iron supplements made of the same materials. All of these different terms refer to materials whose magnetic and/or electric properties have been altered, such that they absorb or attenuate electromagnetic energy instead of reflecting and magnifying it. What if you could take one of these internally? As a ferro-magnetic metal, carbonyl iron is an extremely effective microwave absorber. It literally takes the heat. Early microwave thermometers incorporated the use of carbonyl iron for this very reason. Simply look at its properties such as its permittivity at 2.45 GHz. It can effectively absorb microwave emissions with a -19:1 dB absorbing peak at 2.45 GHz frequency-almost to the tee– the emissions frequency of WiFi microwave emissions and WiFi enabled devices, and most other wireless radiation sources.
It is also effective at the 4-5 GHz frequencies being rolled out as well. In the paper cited above, along with countless others, at the 2.45 GHz frequency, which is the identical frequency of the classroom, as well as home, smart meters, WiFi routers, WiFi enabled devices such as laptops and tablets, wireless gaming controllers, most cordless phones and some cell phones, carbonyl iron appears to be a remarkable candidate for absorbing these particular microwave EMF emissions. I believe that if taken prophylactically, it could conceivably offer protection by keeping the blood brain barrier closed by absorbing the harmful microwave emissions that would otherwise deleteriously be opening the blood brain barrier to metals and toxins that in the absence of EMF exposure, would normally be locked out. In theory, it could also possibly be absorbing the emissions that would otherwise be heading for the metals in the brain, blood and the location where 70% of our immune system resides, the gastrointestinal tract. The emissions could also be responsible for some sort of interaction with compounds or metals present in the developing gut resulting in the disruption of the natural progression of the colonization processes of the intestinal flora. The disruption of the gut could also simply be a result of the brain malfunctioning as a result of the preceding mechanism. Here once again is where the digestive and immune system abnormalities arise. The myriad of food allergies present in Autistic children are simply a result of the selective destruction of certain flora via a non-thermal mechanism due to electromagnetic exposure. I believe the studies support this as pregnant women who took iron saw a drastic decrease in giving birth to an Autistic child.
Why do we find abnormalities in specific portions of the brains of Autistic children? The affected areas are the frontal lobes. If you look at the most common fetal position, you will notice that those lobes are the lowest lying areas of the brain in that fetal position. Gravity at work ends up concentrating the most metals in that portion of the brain. In the presence of damaging wireless microwave emissions, the interaction with the metals resulting in voltage discharges we would expect the most damage to be found in those parts of the brain. We actually do:
I believe this explains why we finding a large increase in connections in these parts of the brain as well as a much larger mass of unusually shorter connections as a direct result of the brain’s ongoing frantic attempts to re route and re wire the connections damaged as a result of the continuous wireless microwave electromagnetic radiation emissions bombardment in utero.
No two children are alike. Some are allergic to peanuts, some to shellfish, some to lactose and some to nothing. Some are more electro-sensitive as well. Here is where I believe that the vaccine connection lies:
I have always known that vaccine production involved nano technologies in production and delivery systems. I have suspected for some time that cylindrical fullerene nano vectors such as carbon nano tubes have been added to the vaccines. What is so concerning about these is that the incredibly varying conductance of these are relatively simple to tailor. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can discharge powerful waves of electricity under certain circumstances as well as have the capacity to penetrate cells and allow nano compounds to travel through. Are these a Trojan horse? I believe that they are. When the microwave emissions come in contact with metals in the brain and other parts of the body at the cellular level, along with these highly conductive structures, it would provide the conductive carbon-rich track necessary for the voltage discharge to negatively influence the neurons’ insulation properties as well as the integrity of the mitochondrial DNA. It is simply the introduction of and presence of metals, not limited to thimerisol ( a form of mercury) which gives rise to this cocktail of environmental agents’ demyelinating properties being enhanced by the microwave emissions’ opening the blood brain barrier, allowing for them to enter at higher levels than normal, and then trapping them inside and acting upon them, the powerful immune response provoking adjuvants, and modified foreign genetic materials that simply overload the already microwave EMF compromised immune system of the infant. In some extremely rare cases, live strains in the vaccines such as the measles virus can demyelinate as well such as in Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis. In other words the battery of immunizations have always been a driving force in the Autism epidemic. Now they are synergistically, increasingly becoming the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back of the already anemic, microwave EMF damaged, electro- sensitive, immuno compromised infant. The Most folks that are aware of vaccine dangers who don’t immunize are also aware of the dangers of EMF emissions and thus have neither risk factor as they avoid both and rightfully so. At this point that is my position until the research can prove otherwise.
We know that in the fields of holistic and alternative medicine, mushrooms are a key component of the protocol of healing and recovering from Autism. Why do certain mushrooms help? They contain nerve-healing substances, known as remyelinating compounds, which stimulate the repair of the protective sheath around the axon of the neurons known as myelin, and which is often damaged in Autistic children.
When you get a bad sunburn, what is the worst thing that you can do? Well stay out in the sun right? So to heal you need to seek shade. That is easy enough, just stay indoors. Problem solved and your body does the rest.
When your body has been damaged by the microwave emissions’ interactions with metals, what is the worst thing that you can do? Well stay exposed to certain metals and the microwave emissions right? So to heal you need to avoid EMF emissions right? Well that is almost impossible isn’t it unless you live in a Faraday cage. So back to the mushrooms. Why do they help Autistic children recover and heal? Mushrooms are a magnet for metals and as such help remove metals from the brain and body. What’s more, what are mushrooms rich in? IRON. There is that iron thing again. So if they cannot avoid the EMF emissions the iron helps absorb the EMF emissions so the blood brain barrier remains closed to the metals and the metals cannot be acted upon by the emissions because the emissions are being absorbed by the iron. This way the healing can take place at the neurological level and the immune system in the gut is similarly spared the onslaught of the EMF/metal interactions’ deleterious effects. In my opinion, this is a crucial component of the pathway to healing Autistic children. Ironically the Special Education programs are doing the OPPOSITE. They are bathing these children with microwave EMF emissions by putting these autistic children in classrooms with powerful WiFi routers and Wifi enabled devices such as tablets and laptops and wireless game controllers. I believe this is the worst thing that can be done to these children.
This bears repeating. If what I am proposing is true, then one would expect a decrease in the prevalence of autism in those who took carbonyl iron before, during pregnancy, and while nursing, those who minimized the pre and post term EMF exposures and delayed umbilical cord clamping until the placental transfer was completed. What the study in the WSJ found was that iron seemed to lower the incidence of Autism. What type of iron supplementation taken by the women in the study which was not disclosed, and in my opinion, may unlock the mystery. The EMF emissions, I believe, are the trigger and that would explain the exponential increase in autism coinciding with the timeline of the expansion of wireless technology.
When I was a kid, we could see and taste the polluted air. My parents used to burn their trash, and factories belching emissions were ubiquitous. Vaccines, metals, and chemical pollution have been around for a long, long time. The prevalence of autism and wireless emissions have not, and I believe they go hand in hand, and can be observed by superimposing graphs readily available all over the internet.
So why is The O.C. the star on the map on the Autism issue? I believe that it is due to our prosperity, affluence and the race to be on the technological cutting edge. If you attended the F.S.D. Board of Trustees meeting on Tuesday night April 30th, you couldn’t possibly have missed the emotional presentation on Autism and the horrific fact that Orange County has the highest Autism rate in the State of California. Fullerton is abuzz as of late with well-intentioned, giving and loving people clearly trying to make a difference. Sadly, the Autism rates are taking off in The O.C. on a similar trajectory to a flight heading out of John Wayne Airport. OUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH IS ON THE DECLINE. Go look and watch a PE class or look at CHOC’s parking lot. There are more pediatric chronic health problems today than you can shake a stick at.
Fullerton is a city full of good deeds and good people. My hat goes off to many of you who clearly give of your time and finances for charities, fundraisers and related causes. Don’t get me wrong. Prudence, however, needs to be exercised, however, in regards to WHAT PROGRAMS ARE TO BE BLINDLY SUPPORTED, specifically, like the proliferation and expansion of classroom wireless technology.
LET’S CUT TO THE CHASE GANG.
TODAY, PEOPLE AND KIDS ARE BEING FED GARBAGE.
IN ORDER TO GET INTO THE CLASSROOMS, CHILDREN ARE BEING INJECTED WITH GARBAGE: http://www.cdc.gov/
AND NOW ONCE INSIDE THE CLASSROOMS THEY ARE BEING IRRADIATED WITH GARBAGE: http://www.
HOW MUCH OF THIS IS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT’S POLICIES? What about the expecting mothers? Do some or all of the preceding apply? Almost all of the O.C.’s hospitals are now expanding like the Vegas strip did in the last decade. Folks, we have an entire generation on the line and this trifecta pays the worst purse imaginable to our children. Extrapolate the graph and you will see that this epidemic is approaching critical mass.
What about the lynch pin, the proverbial elephant in the room? Ah yes, what about the EMF emissions that your children are being exposed right now as you read this article. Where is the informed consent? The implied consent is already there. Do you know the difference? RF emissions in the microwave spectrum frequency range similar to those in the classrooms have been implicated in a myriad of health problems besides the connection to Autism that I am proposing. The emissions coming from these devices such as tablets, laptops and routers in the classrooms are in the 2.45 GHz range. RF emissions well below the FCC guidelines have been implicated in single and double DNA strand breaks: http://www.
In the FSD, we don’t have informed consent regarding RF exposures. Why is that?
So back to the issue. Are the EMF emissions, through some complex mechanism, reacting with, or compounding the effects of, or interacting with the complex chemical compounds or inorganic metals in the garbage that expecting mothers and children are being fed, that they are imbibing, or that they are being injected with, that end up in the children’s developing brains or intestines?
Nano technology has progressed to almost unfathomable levels of advancement. The surfaces areas of metallic nano particles can be engineered in such a way as to possess many different properties. These are not limited to reflecting, attenuating, absorbing or magnifying electromagnetic radiation, specifically microwave radiation. We are being told that despite increasing interest in neuroscience nanotechnologies, little is known about the electrical interactions between nanomaterials and neurons. I believe that is by design. It is a piece of cake to turn a microwatt per cubic centimeter of microwave energy into a biological or neurological damaging voltage discharge in the presence of certain metallic compounds specifically ones that are pointed. So once again, what happens when you microwave metals? Why can’t we put metal objects in a microwave? How do metals get into our bodies? Infant formulas can contain 40 times the amount of Aluminum naturally found in breast milk and believe me it is not the same metallic form. What do you drink your phosphoric acid laced soda solution out of, cook with or on, or bake with? What fertilizers are used on your or your children’s food at the factory farms? Heavy Metals in Fertilizers. What kind of brake pads are on everyone’s cars? Semi metallic? We are drinking, eating and breathing in metals. I believe, however, that the metals alone, are not the problem. Are metals even coming down from the sky on certain days? Are Geo engineering programs using reflective aluminum nano-materials (aerosols) to reflect sunlight actually increasing aluminum levels in our bodies?http://www.youtube.com/
Why does South Korea have an autism rate 260% higher than the US in light of having very similar vaccine requirements for their children? http://www.ncbi.nlm.
South Korea has immersed their population in these microwave emissions as it has become about as wireless as you can get. They are literally drunk on wireless technology.
Microwave ovens operate on the 2.45 Ghz frequency which is the same as the WiFi routers, most smart meters, cordless phones, wireless gaming consoles, controllers, and WiFi enabled laptops and tablets. Although WiFi and wireless devices operate on a much much lower power level than a microwave oven, REMEMBER, SO DOES YOUR BODY. What does low power mean? What is it relative to? Normal background levels at 2.45 GHz are trillions of lower than what these devices emit. It doesn’t take much to destroy the myelin sheathing in terms of electrical overload and it is easily accomplished with voltage discharges when these microwave emissions come in contact with certain metals or metallic compounds in our bodies. Is this happening to the developing brains of the children in or out of the womb from EMF exposures at home, in school or at work from cell towers,WiFi systems or the laptops, smart meters, or the tablets, cell phones or cordless phones, or their base stations on or in direct proximity to your unborn child, toddler or child? How many microwave ovens, WiFi routers, smart meters or these other wireless devices are in use 24/7, overlapping transmissions, in your apartment complex or condominium complex, or in your neighbor’s home compounding your exposures. How many cell towers or antennas are in proximity to your home? Do you or your neighbors have cordless phones? They emit 24/7 even when not in use. These sources send EMF emissions that can go right through walls and right through our bodies. In a pregnant mother, the amniotic fluid aids in the absorption of these emissions and they are multiplied in the womb.
So with all of the fundraising, press coverage and Autism awareness, where are all of the studies on these interactions on the developing young brains in and out of the womb? THERE ARE NONE EXAMINING THE ISSUE FROM THIS ANGLE that I can find anywhere that look at these real life complex interactions. Why?
Is there an effect on the trillions of electrical components which work simultaneously every minute of every day, including the DNA fractal antennae at the molecular level, that are involved in running our bodies? Our human brain running at 3 percent of its capacity, which pales in comparison to the entire incredible machine that God has created is not capable of even coming close to grasping all of the effects of the interactions of our Frankenstein creations on the human body. START MINIMIZING THEM NOW.
Apparently, the industry could care less about looking into this, or doing anything about it. They claim since the emissions are below the current FCC guidelines and are legal, that they are safe. Ironically, many experts believe that they are not :http://thefullertoninformer.
At the local level in Fullerton, why else would the F.S.D. administrators appear to ignore me, apparently refuse to disseminate the information in my 3-25-13 mass email to their staff as I requested, or why instruct their staff to refuse any information that I am handing out in a public place? You know, the district and industry staff, collectively have enough letters after their last names to compose an encyclopedia in several languages. You would think that they would look into it. We deserve better.
WHY IS THERE IS NO EMF INFORMED CONSENT FORM SIMILAR TO WHAT THE LAUSD’S BOARD IS CONSIDERING for parents to sign while the pilot programs continue their expansion in the F.S.D. and classrooms needlessly operate high powered WiFi systems just so the teachers can use a laptop or tablet?
Well there is a bright side to all of this, in a sick and twisted way. In the meantime, special ed is hiring, new managed care industries are forming, foundations are expanding, new pharmacological, petrochemical poison cocktails are being developed to manage symptoms and the EMF levels are going up all around us.
Now let us address the other most insidious threat facing our children today. In my opinion,you would be hard pressed to find an environment in which the wireless radiation exposure increases will be larger than IN THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT’S CLASSROOMS once we are on a 1:1 ratio with upwards of 35+ wireless devices up and running all day with back to back multiple spread spectrum dual frequency industrial strength wireless access points on the walls or ceilings, which in some cases, are a mere few feet from students’ heads. the dangers of wireless classrooms.
I believe that once they get these wireless access points on the walls and ceilings with the wireless devices into the laps of every last one of the kids, phase 2 will begin. I think that they will need to double the frequency to 5.0 GHz range and go to 40-45+ students per room with the kids on a 1-2 dimensional auto pilot program.
I am not an elected representative bestowed with the duty of stewarding the public trust. I am simply calling them out on a perceived gaping hole in it. I am not holding myself out to be an expert. I am not an RF industry scientist. I am not a medical doctor. I am simply a parent whose passing grades yielded a BS degree in Chemistry and a BS degree in Biological Sciences from UCI who understands the science, has a good handle on the issue and dares to stand up for everyone’s children, and not just my own. I am not a taxpayer funded, pay rolled FSD administrator involved in the roll out of, in my opinion, these insidious programs who refuse to engage me and address this issue. I am just simply protesting their eerie silence on the issues since they have been put on notice. At least before, I would get the placation, the phony smiles and that soft NPR voice that says we will look into it, Mr. Imbriano. Now they can’t even pronounce my last name, and show only the back of my head at the city council meetings, no one at the FSD wants to deal with this or answer my questions in writing, and they treat my gig like a multi-level marketing pitch for some soap products. It is alright. I can deal with rejection because I am a salesman. More importantly, in this role as a concerned parent, I have no choice but to stay the course.
One thing is certain, however, and that is “Houston, we have a problem”. I do not hold myself out to be an expert. I will leave the real fact finding and conjecture to the experts who need to do some real research on the big picture. I am merely here to ask the hard questions that everyone is afraid to ask.
If this seems like a nightmare, imagine being one of those diagnosed kids waking up everyday trapped in their different world, that in my opinion, could have possibly have been prevented. This information may seem a bit overwhelming, but the first step is to wake up, second is to get out of bed, third is to stand up and look in the mirror, fourth is to not drink the Kool- Aid another day, fifth is to realize that a first step is all that is required to get on the road to right an egregious wrong, and sixth is not to go back to sleep. Your children will have children too someday, we can only hope. Do it for them.
So to the soon to be parents or the parents of children in the FSD or anywhere else for that matter, I leave a note of caution: Get these wireless things off of your heads and out of your’s and your children’s laps. Keep them away from your’s and your children’s brains and reproductive areas. Most importantly-KEEP THESE MICROWAVE DEVICES AND EMISSION SOURCES, AWAY FROM YOUR UNBORN CHILDREN.
Once this stuff goes into the classrooms it will be hard to get it out. There is still time to stop this.
The real good news is that this issue-Autism is on the radar and a ton of good people have come out and shown that they want to do something to help. I want to do something to stop it by putting this hypothesis out to the community and the scientific world at large. There has been remarkable support for the caring organizations out there doing a lot of good. My hope is that there will be those in positions of influence that can take this and run with it all the way to the highest levels.
I, as the site administrator of The Fullerton Informer and as a parent, personally want this public health crisis to come to a screeching halt because I truly know that it can. Is there any reason that the Autism capital of the State can’t become the Autism cure capital of the world? WE MUST HARD WIRE THE TECHNOLOGY! I believe that the elephant in the room is the MICROWAVE EMF EMISSIONS BOMBARDING THE METALS IN THE DEVELOPING CHILD’S BRAIN AND BLOOD CAUSING ELECTRICAL DISCHARGES IN THE DEVELOPING BRAINS OF ANEMIC UNBORN CHILDREN AND INFANTS. WE MUST ADDRESS THESE ISSUES.
Although genetic predisposition to certain sensitivitIes or susceptibilities do exist, the fact is that THERE IS NO GENE RESPONSIBLE FOR AUTISM. I believe that the alleged genetic component is a red herring and a deep dark rabbit hole sucking all of the DIRECTED research money and efforts into. A cursory review of the plethora of studies on the causes of Autism results in far more conclusive findings than blaming sun spots for the condition. In my opinion, the cause of Autism is clearly environmental and aside from the vaccine induced cases of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, I believe that all roads lead to Rome in all of the studies-anemia, metals and EMF interactions. Look at yet another recent Wall Street Journal piece: How Autism Is Different in Girls vs. Boys . The article seems to lead the reader nowhere. Do I sound like I am leading the reader nowhere with my article? I am simply laying the groundwork for an entirely new path in Autism research to blazed.
This hypothesis has never been proposed. It is literally nowhere to be found in any of the research anywhere that I can find except this blog. It amazes me that with all of the billions of dollars going into Autism research that what is painstakingly obvious to me is being completely ignored by all involved. Maybe it just sounds too crazy to be true but what the heck, so did the earth being round at one point in time.
Fullerton School Board Trustee Chris Thompson, who by the way disagrees with our position, has been the only person from the Board of Trustees that has ever picked up the phone and reached out to me with respect to concerns that I may have. The other four could apparently care less. We look forward to working through Mr. Thompson, who in my opinion, has and continues to be, even in the face disagreement on an issue such as this, an advocate of parents and the taxpayers, to gain access to film and record EMF measurements in the classrooms. It is my sincere hope that Chris and I will see eye to eye someday soon on what I believe to be a potential health disaster in the making. That decision will be up to Chris as my position is not changing. I respectfully urge Mr. Thompson to carefully and objectively look into the research that has and continues to be presented as I feel that it should be incumbent upon any elected representative to fully investigate any potential danger posed to the children in the F.S.D., specifically the EMF issue that has many well know experts divided on.
I realize that the information herein contained will truly fly in the face of most acceptable medical procedures, protocols, research and mainstream thought. Regardless, I strongly believe that we need to end the microwave EMF bombardment of the unborn and children, closely monitor iron levels in all expecting mothers, end the rampant and unnecessary medical profession’s pruning of the mental faculties of our children with these barbaric umbilical cord clampings at birth, and reformulate all prenatal vitamins to exclusively contain carbonyl iron as the only source of iron period. Additionally, we need to stop treating the developing child in the womb as the star of multiple ultrasound videos that are not medically necessary. http://www.ncbi.
If you don’t want to immunize your children, simply sign this form and turn it in to your school office. http://www.cdph.ca.
If you don’t want your child irradiated, hard wire your home and sign this form and turn it into your school office: http://
Ladies and gentleman, look at that graph again. It keeps going up. The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over and expecting different results. The time has come to question what has long since been given a pass on involvement in Autism and that is what I believe to be the EMF emissions. We must start thinking outside the box or we will never get ourselves and our children out of it. Autism research thus far ignores studying the interactions of pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation with metals in the body. In general, research into the dangers of exposure to these emissions currently amounts to the likes of approving the use of lasers on humans by testing the lasers effects on the skin and ignoring what they would do the eyes when exposed. Put your hand on the laser at the check out stand at the grocery store and you know what happens? Nothing. Now stick your eye over it. Get the picture. You see it is easy to deem something safe when you direct the research in ways that completely ignore effects on areas of the body which by far would be the most sensitive to exposure. The real science would involve real simulations. We have NOTHING of the sort as it all dances around the issue and in the meantime, we are being bathed in microwave radiation. I believe much larger crisis looms if we fail to act that will have multi-generational consequences. Ask yourself the following question: Where are all the studies on exposure of the unborn and school children to these emissions which analyze effects on the human reproductive organs, specifically the female ovum (your daughters’ eggs that they were born with). Show me the studies anywhere that do just that. There are NONE ladies and gentlemen, none anywhere.
Loving your neighbor sometimes involves sticking your neck out for them and their kids. With this issue, I am doing that in a big way. This is not making me popular by any means and nor has that ever been my intent. For those of you who personally know me, you are familiar with the fact that I have always dreamed big, never been afraid to tell it like it is, or tell it like I see it, and you know that I truly care about the well being of everyone’s children. May God bless the future generations and remember that we have been entrusted with caring for them. May we all take an active role in being part of ending this senseless public health disaster in the making, CDC: 1 In 5 US Children May Have Mental Disorder unfolding right before our very own eyes, in Jesus name. Amen.
The information in this document is for educational purposes ONLY.
This document contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world.
Do not take this document as a personal advice or medical advice of any kind.
Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health.
- See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/#sthash.6fzndFgQ.dpuf
I live in Fullerton. My kids attend Fullerton schools. I go to public meetings all the time that pertain to what, when, where and how things are going to affect my community and how those bestowed with the revocable public trust will behave when no one is looking. As a card carrying taxpaying member of the 65th Assembly district, I was invited by my Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk Silva along with all the rest of the 145,000+ residents of Fullerton to attend a little shindig over at the local High School down the street with the top dog Torlakson and all the rest of the education brass who just so happen to be the ones who could pull the plug on this massive radiation experiment taking place in classrooms all over this once Golden State.
So naturally, we RSVPed. The Fullerton Informer showed up with our banner, and set up camp right on the first amendment protected sidewalk right next to the entrance to Troy High School and proceeded to notify the educrats, parents, students and anyone else that pulled in that by their silence on this issue, that they are all possibly complicit in exposing these children and students to unprecedented levels of pulse modulated high frequency microwave radiation trillions of times higher than what our parents were exposed to as children, that could potentially cause reproductive harm, cancer, ADHD and a myriad of other health problems with this wireless agenda. These, by the way, are not simply my assertions: microwave radiation, cancer and infertility. There are thousands of studies out there on this.
After about an hour or so filming the train of cars passing us on the sidewalk, I figured it was time for a little meet and greet, so I decided to mosey on in to the reception to taste some of the fruit and see if they really filter the water. I got to the sign in table and signed in. I went to get my name tag and WHADDAYA KNOW, THEY DIDN’T HAVE ONE FOR ME!
Well, as I stood there, I was greeted by a parent that I have known for some time from little league and she was encountering the same problem. She was not on the list either. She didn’t have a name tag either. As a matter of fact, in the 72 seconds that I stood at the tables, I noticed that many people were not on the list and were being encouraged to fill out their own name tags by the gals working the tables. Not long after I put a lemon slice in my water, Ed Kephart, who was watching me on the sidewalk, singled me out to SRO Kendler. Officer Kendler told me, “because you are not on the guest list, you have to leave.” I advised him that it was a public meeting and that I RSVPed the day before and he repeated, “you have to leave”.
I wonder why they didn’t call in some back up from Anaheim PD to escort the other 50 people in attendance that were not on the list either? Well folks, it is simply because I was the only one in attendance at this public meeting that they wanted the heck out of there. You see, I believe that I was merely singled out solely based on what the meeting organizers thought I might say at the meeting, and as such appears to have been a conscious content-based decision specifically designed to rob me of my ability to exercise my First Amendment rights and observe and participate in that meeting. They did not want me to be permitted to participate in the meeting or hear what the speakers had to say. Gee, I wonder why? Could it be that I was going to address the fact that they were all involved in a massive wireless agenda that according to scientific research, has the potential to cause cancer and reproductive harm to school children? Yeah, they didn’t want me asking any questions alright. I wonder if they all pledged allegiance as they plotted.
So instead, I simply chose the high road and allowed myself to be publicly humiliated, and temporarily forgo my First Amendment rights after I was confronted by a man in a black uniform with a gun. Perplexed, I agreed to leave the premises without any further ado. Being disruptive could certainly have been grounds for removal and someone held in the high esteem by these fellows like myself was by no means willing to make myself an occupant of the back seat of a black and white in this town, especially when the air and the company was much better on the sidewalk anyway. You know what they say, you pick your battles wisely.
So I was told to leave a public meeting because I was not on the guest list. This obviously made no sense to me so I proceeded to call Quirk Silva’s local office. The gentlemen on the phone took my number and told me that he would contact her staff to see what was going on. I asked him if it was a public meeting and he told me it was “an RSVP meeting” -(never heard of one of those). I asked him if he could confirm the RSVP list while we were talking and he couldn’t confirm the names on the list. After a period of time on hold, he came back on the line and told me, “your being asked to leave was a matter of campus security and the Assemblywoman, and her staff hadn’t the authority to override a campus security decision or issue.”
What was the problem, now really? How many seats was I going to occupy? By the looks of this room I could have have brought my 8th grader’s entire classes for a civics lesson.
Here is what our illustrious assembly woman Sharon Quirk Silva had to say about this supposed “invitation only” meeting “I was pleased to invite State Superintendent Tom Torlakson to visit Troy High School. As a former teacher and local elected official it is essential to bring state and local policymakers, students, parents, teachers and administrators to discuss how we can work together and increase student success in California schools.” — huh? Last time I checked, I was a parent— four times over.
My next call was to the Fullerton Police Department dispatch. I briefly explained where I was and what happened and that I wanted to know the specific reason that I was asked to leave. The dispatcher took my phone number and told me that she would have the officer come out and talk to me. So I waited on the sidewalk where earlier in the morning, the SRO and Kephart and Avina were staring at me earlier in the morning, holding up the banner on the sidewalk with my associates. They knew where I was and who I came with and which car was mine. Time had passed and that filtered water got the better of me. I had to make a decision. Do I go into the Troy office and ask to use the restroom where I was now the subject of “a campus security issue” or do I go down the street to Western State to use their facilities? Well, I chose the latter given the circumstances.
Wouldn’t you know, officer Kandler and Kephart came out for a peek, when I was not there for about 10 minutes, walked halfway to the sidewalk where my associates were standing with the banner, and went back inside without asking them where I was. For another hour or so, I waited for a phone call or him to come outside. As it turns out, another mom we know stopped by to chat with us and we told her what was going on and she offered to call officer Decaprio. She did and he offered to send a out a Sargent in about 15 minutes. Well, 15 minutes came and went a couple of times so one of my associates called him again. He said Sargent Williams will be on the way. About 20 minutes later, a cruiser rolls into the parking lot and heads for the office. Officer Williams gets out and goes inside. We remained on the sidewalk but moved to the eastern driveway to show the guests our message as they departed. Close to 11:00 am, Williams emerged from the office with Kandler speaking on the steps. I assumed that since I called dispatch, and 2 calls were made to officer Decaprio, and that I was told to leave the premises, that I was to wait on the sidewalk for them. Well, I waited and around 11:15 or so, Williams starts heading back to his car in what appears to be his attempt to drive away. So, here I stand on the sidewalk exiled from the long since concluded public meeting waiting for an answer from the Fullerton Police officers as to why I was asked to leave watching him about to bail the scene. My associate hurried toward him and flagged him down. I walked over and I spoke with both of the officers and asked why I was asked to leave a public meeting. SRO Kendler told us that Tom Torlakson’s aide gave the order to have me removed. The reason was because I was not an invited guest. I proceeded to remind them that it was a public meeting. Officer Williams explained that it was all a misunderstanding and that SRO Kendler attempted to make contact with me to let me know that I could come back in. I explained that no one called my cell phone from the FPD or Sharon’s office, and no one attempted to make contact with my associates to see where I went for those 10 minutes while we waited on the sidewalk for 2 and 1/2 hours for them to come tell me what I did wrong. I chose not to split hairs and we parted ways. Chalk it up to experience I guess.
Later that day, I sent an email to the FJUHSD superintendent and an email to Tom Torlakson asking for some clarity and who gave the orders to have me removed.
This afternoon, I received the following email from Jennifer Williams from the FJUHSD:
———- Forwarded message ———-
Date: Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Meeting at Troy High School with guest speaker California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson 10-23-13.
To: joe imbriano <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: George Giokaris <GGiokaris@fjuhsd.k12.ca.us>
Please accept the District’s sincerest apology for initially not allowing you to participate yesterday at the State of the Education event held at Troy High School (TRHS).
We offer this explanation not in any attempt to excuse what happened, but only to possibly assist you in accepting our apology.
There was a miscommunication yesterday between the staff members from Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva’s office, the TRHS Resource Officer (SRO), TRHS administrators, and Dr. Williams. As you are aware, the event was coordinated by Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva’s office with the assistance of the District. The District believed the event was by invitation only. We had assisted the Assemblywoman’s staff members in preparing a portion of the invitation list; and therefore, we knew your name was not on the list. The TRHS administration and the SRO asked if you had been invited and our staff members said you had not. The staff members from Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva’s office thought TRHS administration and the District wanted you to leave and told the SRO to ask you to leave. The District was unaware that Assemblywoman Quirk-Silva’s office had posted an open invitation on their web site. By the time staff were made aware of the misunderstanding and instructed the SRO to go back and find you, you were gone. It is our understanding that SRO Kandler followed up and spoke with you to explain as well.
Again, we sincerely apologize.
Jennifer Williams, Ed.D.
Director Administrative Services
Fullerton Joint Union High School District
Did you catch that? Where does one begin? Well, semantics for starters. Let’s begin with “initially”. Jennifer starts out with, “Please accept the District’s sincerest apology for initially not allowing you to participate.“ Last time I checked, initially was defined as of, relating to, or occurring at the beginning. Initially? What the heck? I didn’t find out that I could go back into the meeting until AFTER THE MEETING WAS OVER.
I believe here is the only kernel of truth and husk of honesty in this whole rotten ear of corn. ”We offer this explanation not in any attempt to excuse what happened.” Of course they can’t attempt to excuse the fact that they clearly violated my First Amendment rights and treated me like a criminal.
Do they think that I just fell off the turnip truck or something? If this is the sincerest apology they have to offer, I would hate to see what the phony one looks like. Look gang, lets go line by line here. These people are amazing. What happened to me yesterday was downright wrong and unethical. I was singled out from a group of 300+ people just because I want this radiation experiment on our kids to come to an end and I make no bones about our position.
So with the decades of experience that these administrators have in combing through $120 million dollar budgets every other month with a fine tooth comb, an electron microscope and a metal detector and hosting events at sensitive locations such as SCHOOLS, do you think that they knew the difference between a meeting that was open to the public and one that was by invitation only? Ok, let’s assume that they are not lying. I will give the the benefit of the doubt for the next ten seconds. So if the FJUHSD staff really believed that it was an invitation only meeting with State level guests attending, then they would be CHECKING INVITATIONS AT THE DOOR. They were doing no such thing. So what do we make of Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk Silva’s flyers and announcements that invited the ENTIRE 65th Assembly district and just about anyone else that has a pulse on her PUBLIC website and FACEBOOK page? I guess the FJUHSD staff missed those too.
Jennifer Williams goes on to say that the FJUHSD staff “ had assisted the Assemblywoman’s staff members in preparing a portion of the invitation list; and therefore, we knew your name was not on the list“. Wow, so if you prepare a portion of the list then you know who is not on the portion that you didn’t prepare? Clairvoyance huh, Jennifer? So preparing part of an RSVP list gives them the omniscience that ” therefore, we knew your name was not on the list”. Amazing.
“The TRHS administration and the SRO asked if you had been invited and our staff members said you had not.” Ah, the million dollar questions right here folks:
1) WHY WERE THEY ASKING IF I WAS ON THE LIST?
2) WHO DID THEY ASK?
3) WHAT MEMBERS OF THE TRHS ADMINISTRATION ASKED IF I WAS NOT ON THE LIST ?
4) WHY WERE THEY SINGLING ME OUT?
5) WHY WERE THEY NOT GOING AFTER ALL THE OTHERS WITH HANDWRITTEN NAME TAGS?
Oh boy – “The staff members from Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva’s office thought TRHS administration and the District wanted you to leave and told the SRO to ask you to leave.” No – Sharon’s office told me that they didn’t know why I was asked to leave and it ”was a matter of campus security and they had no power to override it”. SRO Kendler told us that it was Torlakson’s aide that ordered us to be removed.
This is a real humdinger right here: “The District was unaware that Assemblywoman Quirk-Silva’s office had posted an open invitation on their web site.” Really? Can I schedule a meeting on campus, post invitations everywhere, invite the whole world, and not clear that part with Dr. George? The health and safety of State level officials and a thousand students was potentially on the line when you opened up an in use, fully operational, fully occupied school facility to host a meeting with hundreds of guests and you apparently didn’t understand what the scope and nature of the invitation and announcement process as well as those who will be in attendance were? Got some dough Dr. George? I got some land on the surface of the sun for sale if your are interested.
“ By the time staff were made aware of the misunderstanding and instructed the SRO to go back and find you, you were gone.” REALLY? While my bright, yellow car glistened in the parking lot, my remaining outside for 3 hours, with our repeated calls to the FPD and Sharon’s office with not one return call, and without any attempts to contact me or my associates for 2 1/2 hours including the measly ten minutes that I was gone to the restroom, that is called attempting to make contact with me? There was obviously NO legitimate attempt by SRO Kendler, Sharon’s office, her staff, FJUHSD Staff or the FPD to contact me.
“It is our understanding that SRO Kandler followed up and spoke with you to explain as well.” We expended a massive amount of effort to get someone to follow up and explain why I got the royal treatment, and yes SRO Kendler did explain the most important part of the whole thing - that is who gave the order to run me off. Kendler stated that it was Torlakson’s aide who gave the order.
We cannot overlook Troy High School principal, Dr. Avina’s assessment of yesterdays event from the school website http://www.troyhigh.com/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=367239&type=u:
“We have had a wonderful fall at Troy High School. We had the honor of hosting State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Torlekson as well as Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva, and Orange County Superintendent of Schools Al Mijares this month. This event was attended by local school superintendents, city mayors, PTA presidents, and educators throughout the Fullerton area. Our amazing custodians made the campus look beautiful, and our office staff was pivotal in creating a welcoming environment. The “buzz” of the event was the gorgeous Halloween pumpkins which were hand-painted by students in Mike Thomas’s AP Studio Art class. Many thanks to everyone who made this event special.”
Did you catch that? The staff was staff was pivotal in creating a welcoming environment? Yeah as long as you are a blind supporter of the agenda, you got your very own name tag. Holy smokes! The buzz of the event was the pumpkins? What kind of kool aid were they drinking inside that theater room anyway? They illegally throw me out of a public meeting on my rear end as my associates and I are out on the sidewalk trying to warn every Tom, Dick, and Harry in the joint about the potential for cancer, ADHD, reproductive harm and a host of other maladies that could be staring every kid in the face in the FJUHSD from the common core microwave matrix that Giokaris just green lighted, and it’s all about the pumpkins. As amateur night states so eloquently on this blog -”man alive.” I digress.
Well, let’s get back to the District’s mouthpiece or piece in mouth.
Dr. Williams, I cannot accept an insincere apology from a public servant that willingly chooses to ignore literally thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that warn against what you and Dr. George have blatantly chosen to do, that is to proceed with the district’s wireless technology plan on the heels of all of the information that you have been personally presented with that you choose to ignore. Instead you have decided to proceed to irradiate every last one of the children in the FJUHSD.
Dr. Williams, I will not accept an insincere apology from a steward of the public trust who in my opinion, cannot be trusted by putting forth such an obfuscation in the form of such a preposterous explanation for my being purposely singled out, publicly humiliated, and removed from an open public meeting solely based on what the meeting organizers thought I might do or say at the meeting. This, as such, appears to have been a content-based decision that was intentionally made to violate and interfere with the exercise of my first amendment rights and to keep me out of that meeting. Once again, I was publicly humiliated and your insincere diatribe speaks volumes as to how you appear to have every intention to continue to do just that by insulting my intelligence with this pathetic spin. And to think I took the high road over the last 7 months with the FJUHSD simply behooves me right now. Can you imagine if my lovely wife was with me while you guys publicly gave me the shaft? You guys are a real class act.
Jennifer, please, save it for later. Let me know when you manage to remove that foot from your mouth, and please try speaking a little clearer next time with a lot more sincerity and a lot less of everything else. As far as the First Amendment goes over at the Troy campus, have your staff review it, would you please? Make sure you include the Harvard trained helmswoman over there with the walkie talkie (Troy High School principal, Dr. Avina). Get ready because the kids are already asking about this wireless stuff. The parents and the teachers will be next. I guess we will see how the First Amendment pans out over on Dorothy behind those gates. It is alive and well on the sidewalk.
In the meantime, The Fullerton Informer will continue our efforts to expose and end the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known and we hope that all involved will realize that silence on this issue is complicity. Your paltry paychecks are not worth it people. Well, sadly, to some, as we have seen, they just may be.
Reassessment of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Limits and Policies (Docket No. FCC-2013-0204)
According to Apple’s product information guide, iPads can emit even more radiation than cell phones.http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1524/en_US/iPad_Important_Product_Information_Guide.pdf Also, the scientific literature clearly shows that children absorb more radiation than adults.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999884
According to the scientific evidence itself, in our opinion, it would be reasonable to state that children who use iPads for long periods of time are likely to have a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Equally worrying is that in my opinion, children may actually suffer severe reproductive harm. So what kind of risk are we talking about? Isn’t that really the question? According to high quality independently funded research by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden:
For every 100 hours of cellphone use, the risk of brain cancer increases by 5%.
So how many hours would children in Fullerton schools be exposed?
175 days x 6 hours = 875 hours per year.
That means after each year of exposure to these wireless devices there would be a 44% increased risk of brain cancer.
After 13 years, this comes to a 572% increased risk of cancer, for adults that is. For children, the increased risk would be much more, as research shows that they have at least double the risk of adults.
So according to these calculations, children would have an 1100% increased risk of brain cancer as a result of using an iPad at school. This does not include time spent doing homework or other extraneous activities. WiFi enabled devices such as tablets and laptops in the classroom possibly emit as much or more high frequency pulse modulated microwave radiation as a cell phone and they are in direct proximity to the children’s sensitive developing reproductive areas.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LINK BELOW FROM THE LARGEST TRIAL BAR IN THE WORLD AS THEY WEIGH IN ON THE FCC’S RF EXPOSURE GUIDELINES.
FOLKS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR CHILDREN HERE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR FUTURE. LET’S SHOW THAT WE CARE AND NOT JUST ACT LIKE IT.
Wireless Microwave Radiation and American Hyperopia: the smoke and mirrors of a false dichotomy in the making.
In the not so distant future, the unmitigated public health disaster in the making directly resulting from the wireless microwave radiation bombardment of human populations and the resultant environmental and human tragedy EMF issue will all be blamed on Fukushima. Just watch the talking heads on the idiot box begin to lay out the biggest red herring in human history with a twinkle in their eyes deeply recessed into their teleprompter reading facelifted mugs. Ladies and gentlemen you and your children are being had in a big bad way.
Yes Fukushima is thousands and thousands of miles away and what is spewing out of there is being diluted by quadrillions of gazillions of gallons of water and a billion gazillion trillions of cubic feet of air which at present are not even sporadically increasing background levels of ionizing radiation more that 50% or so when the jet stream makes a direct deposit on us. The ocean currents carry but vastly dilute. Remember all of the atomic testing over Nevada and the Pacific ocean? Been to Vegas lately? How quickly we forget. Yes the disaster in Japan is horrific at the local level but pales in comparison to what is being done in our airwaves, under our oceans, in our classrooms, bedrooms, backyards, workplaces and even in your and your children’s laps.
Water absorbs, amplifies and propagates these these pulse modulate man made square wave emissions that are trillions of times the normal background levels that exist in nature. The maximum dielectric loss of water begins at 2.45 GHz. Most microwave communications systems employ anywhere from 900 MHz on up with some dancing around the magic number and most coming in right on the money. Satellite communications systems, cell towers, masts, antennae arrays, and underwater communications systems have literally become ubiquitous over night. This is where the bath in these microwave emissions that the you, I, our children, and our planet is getting comes from. Yes they may be invisible but extremely powerful. They tell us not to worry because it is all low power? Well that is a misconception. Low power relative to what? The oven in your kitchen? The fact is that these sources of microwave radiation emit levels at or above 1,000,000,000,000 times the normal background levels found in nature. Given that all life forms are mostly made up of water and the absorption peak of water is almost to the tee, the exact frequency of these emissions, one would expect problems. Fish kills, bird die offs and the like are not outside the realm of possibilities, especially when you combine the exposure to environmental contaminants like pollution and metals with these immune and health damaging emissions. Oxidative stress, Calcium channel disruptions and voltage discharges in the presence of metals inside living systems wreak havoc on biological processes that have otherwise been running in precision since the creation of the world.
What about the Tesla antennae array up around Gakona, Alaska called “HAARP”? Ostensibly it operates at anywhere from 2.8 MHz up to 10 MHz. At least that is what they admit. This thing emits at a power level of 3,600,000 watts. At least that is what they admit. What about these 5 story microwave towers floating around up in space? My father always told me that the truth is where the big boys never tell you to look and and is never found where the bad boys send you to search. God rest his soul, he was so right on.
Let us not forget the children. You see these unborn children: http://www.buzzfeed.com/personhoodusa/top-10-mind-blowing-images-of-human-life-in-the-wo-drqv along with the rest of us are constantly getting hit by sources, at times inches, instead of oceans away, with trillions of times the normal background levels of pulse modulated non-ionizing microwave radiation whose frequencies approach, equate to or exceed the resonance frequency of water from 900 MHz on up to 8 GHz from spread spectrum wireless access points, WiFi routers, wireless keyboards, cell towers, wireless antenna arrays, RF modules, wireless mouses, wireless TV’s, wireless printers, wireless DVRs, wireless security camera systems, wireless video game controllers and consoles, cellphones, laptops, baby monitors, cell phones, tablets, microwave ovens, cordless phones and their base stations, and whatever else people are bringing home, or live or work around.
None of the experts are concerned about that. As a matter of fact, research is directed down rabbit holes away from where it should be headed. Just look at the Autism tragedy: http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/ . How about effects on fertility? http://thefullertoninformer.com/what-is-wifi-doing-to-your-daughters/
Why is that? Is it a result of the several trillion dollar wireless industry, and the pension funds loaded to the hilt with these industry, paper tiger titans’ stock? Is it because the 800 billion dollar bonanza for Big Pharma is enjoying the sick joy ride with a well oiled production line manned by an army of servile two dimensional thinking list verifiers running 24/7 turning out damaged people from here to kingdom come that will end up on the pharmaceutical petrochemical poison fly paper with all of their appendages eventually? Oh think of the residuals. Better yet, is it because there is an insidious stealth agenda to reduce human fertility?
Don’t worry, nothing to fear. This is all just another inconvenient truth, aah um, I mean a conspiracy theory. If you have heard one then you have heard them all. Go back to sleep my little one, tune in, turn on and drop out while you all feel the love of big brother, big sister, big pharma and the good vibrations of the wireless industry beamed into your brains and bodies via the 300 channel blue glow wireless idiot boxes that they Orwellianly refer to as “smart TVs”.
Nothing to see here, move along now. The experts tell us all the wireless stuff is safe. Oh what would we do without the the experts, the gift that keeps on giving. They bestow upon us a legacy the likes of: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/05/17/up-to-1-in-5-children-suffer-from-mental-disorder-cdc-says/
I submit to you that what you see is not what you get and what you don’t see is what is going to get you. It is the oldest trick in the book. Nothing to see here now move along is what the RF industry tells you as they bathe schoolchildren along with the rest of the unsuspecting in unprecedented levels of pulse modulated high frequency microwave radiation.
Keep your eyes on the ball ladies and gentlemen, and please don’t look at the red one.
The Fullerton Informer got a load of the 21st century learning’s Trojan horse microwave matrix common core sales pitch over at the Fullerton library the other night. Dr. George Giokaris and Dr. Bob Pletka both tried to serve it straight up on the rocks. All this talk about reinventing the public educational wheel that has failed this country beyond description over the course of the last 40 years or so really got me to thinking. Have the terms privacy, critical thinking and education become mutually exclusive? I believe that it sure looks that way folks as described in the following well written O.C. Register article:
Just you wait until the real journaling starts on those microwave transmitters coming to your children’s laps. Perhaps at your school, it is already happening. No matter how you slice it, it comes up lose lose for the children and now even the parents. As for me and mine, well, we ain’t buyin’ it. The snake oil needs to stay in the bottle and the buffalo chips need to head back out to the pasture. As far as crossing the line, well irradiating young children all day long just so the brainwashing can continue and the algorithms and the dossiers can be compiled crosses ‘em all ladies and gentlemen.
THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. THE NON THERMAL EFFECTS OF PULSE MODULATED MICROWAVE RADIATION HAVE BEEN KNOWN FOR LONGER THAN MANY OF US HAVE BEEN ALIVE. DO YOU THINK THAT THEY GOT IT ALL FIGURED OUT 46 YEARS LATER? WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW, MAY BE HARMING YOUR CHILDREN.
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS A VERY INTERESTING READ TO SAY THE LEAST. JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT THINGS COULDN’T GET ANY STRANGER, THEY DO. STICK AROUND AND SEE WHAT WE AT THE FULLERTON INFORMER HAVE IN STORE.
Oh yes, and non thermal effects of pulse modulated high frequency microwave radiation are just merely figments of our imaginations:
On March 5, 2013, The Fullerton Informer began the quest to end what we believe to be the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known. Since that date we have logged close to a million hits from all over the world. We are by no means alone ladies and gentlemen.
Yes it all began as a result of an email from the Fullerton School District’s acting superintendent Dr. Robert Pletka. I was previously involved with his office as a result of an investigation into my allegations of mistreatment of my son over at Acacia Elementary which directly involved principal Karen Whisnant and my son’s teacher Stephanie Givens. With the help of Trustee Chris Thompson, my wife and I arranged a meeting with Dr. Pletka to address my concerns. There was a subsequent investigation and upon conclusion of such, Dr. Pletka stated that he continued to believe that our concerns were real and he would take appropriate steps. The subsequent actions taken by the district were not made public but problems had ceased in the interim. It was’t long after that however, that they began again, remained ongoing, and ironically in my opinion, they still continue to this day. Stephanie Givens was awarded teacher of the year. The OC Register awarded Acacia Elementary the title of the number one school in Orange County and the smoke and mirrors hid this bizarre irony for many.
At the time back in March, I felt that the rapport between Dr. Robert Pletka and I was good and the trust was there. I felt that I had his ear and he was willing to advocate for much needed change at Acacia. Meanwhile, Acacia school began a pilot program in my son’s GATE class which involved room 7 to go wireless. It was my choice at the time to subsequently remove my son from the GATE class when they decided several months into the school year to abandon pencil and paper and go 1:1 with Ipads. At the time I had no idea that entire school had WiFi systems that permeated every room. When I provided Dr. Robert Pletka with several links to articles, scientists’ claims, and videos that warn that the wireless classroom model had potential dangers, he responded to me that we have both formulated our opinions over a long time and a few articles here or there were not going to change either of our minds. He then sent me some outdated links from the W.H.O. and information from industry links from Cisco and the like. The emails continued back and forth for a short period but resulted in no progress. He never offered to personally meet and discuss these concerns. His mind was already made up. When Karen Whisnant was presented with this information, she as usual, responded with placation first and foremost, and then, as always, followed it up with patronization, thanking me for the thought provoking information. Of course nothing else was forthcoming from her. It was their display of authoritative arrogance coupled with the low road my son walked for months at Acacia that ushered in the dawn of and the tone of this movement as it involved the F.S.D.
The Fullerton School District is home to some 14,000+ students in grades K-8. Many of these students, unbeknownst to me, were already using WiFi enabled devices. I found Dr. Pletlka’s Facebook page was riddled with photos of children in the F.S.D. using laptops and Ipads many literally resting down where they should be nowhere near. What’s more, I found out that there were plans to go 1:1 throughout the entire district and Acacia was ground zero for the roll out. It turns out that this is what Dr. Robert Pletka had done in his previous stint in the San Diego County schools. The most vulnerable segment of the student population in Fullerton was slated for receiving the most microwave emissions exposure, more than that of the high school district. This to me was shocking. The next step was for me to continue disseminating information regarding this issue to Dr. Pletka and Karent Whisnant which I did to no avail.
The more I researched into this issue, the more horrified I had become. Within a matter of days, I began to question the various high schools if they indeed were wireless as of yet. I was told no. It was at that time we had requested a meeting with Dr. Giokaris and Dr. Williams from the F.J.U.H.S.D. to discuss our concerns. They agreed to meet with us and listen to our concerns. What seemed unusual at that time was the room adjacent to our meeting was full of district staff while Dr. Giokaris had his chair in the doorway to ensure the door remained open. It was obvious that a larger audience was in attendance. In the meantime, they were very open and up front about their plans and timeline. He agreed to review the information and that was back in March of this year. There had been no formal contact initiated by his office until around labor day weekend when Dr. Williams called to schedule a meeting to discuss the F.J.U.H.S.D.’s technology plan.
In the meantime, in the F.S.D., the rollout of the Ipad programs and the installation of the enterprise class Cisco wireless access points continued to encompass every school in the District. While this continued, I appeared at virtually every school board meeting jamming this website down their throats, with handouts followed by my three minute diatribes dressing them down, asking them not to proceed, and the technology expansion just continued to accelerate. I handed out thousands of fliers and information packets to parents over the course of several months on numerous occasions, and sent mass emails to every school and administrative office in the entire Fullerton School District. Aside from the frightened parents, not one response from anyone in the F.S.D. except Trustee Chris Thompson and one other board member that said she was looking into it. At one board meeting an F.S.D. teacher refused to accept one of my handouts because he said “I was told not to accept it….my superiors may have a problem with it…”
In the F.J.U.H.S.D., however, something very different was going on. They were actually investigating what we alleged and put their plans on hold as a result. Consequently, I continued to attend the F.J.U.H.S.D. board meetings and politely presented information and informed the board, administrative staff, and principals of the potential dangers of the proliferation of this technology. They were given handouts including the Autism hypothesis I wrote. As I stood at the door of the room handing out information to teachers and parents, not one refused the handouts. Aside from some concerned parents, months had gone by and not one single F.J.U.H.S.D. member of staff, employee or board member reached out to me with a phone call or an email.
Meanwhile, in the F.S.D., my visits to the board meetings continued parallel to the F.J.U.H.S.D meetings but with a different tone and demeanor. The blog articles went along the same lines as the meetings. The basic tenet of the argument was questioning how when presented with all of the information over the course of several months, how did it appear that the F.S.D. continued to ignore it, not reach out to me, call a meeting to discuss an issue such as this and the whole time step on the gas and accelerate its roll out?
So here we have Dr. Giokaris putting plans on hold while investigating, and Dr. Pletka stepping on the gas. July came with a bang with the RF report released by the F.S.D. showing impossibly low microwave radiation levels in the classroom at my child’s school and a blanket total safety statement flying in the face of everything I had presented signed by,you guessed it, Dr. Robert Pletka.
Yesterday The Fullerton Informer met with Dr. George Giokaris and Dr. Jennifer Williams and they confirmed that based on their research and findings, in spite of the thousands of scientific studies that show harm, that they are proceeding with the district technology plan with virtually no changes except for the fact that the access points will not be located in classrooms. That statement by Dr. Williams, in my opinion,proves that they are cognizant of the fact that there is some risk associated with these devices. Why else would they not locate them in the classrooms. Dr. Giokaris was asked point blank by myself, how many hours did he personally invest in researching this issue on this website and he declined to state. What is not clear to him is that the IP tracking logs had answered that question long before I asked it. After a rather lengthy discussion that even bordered on philosophical at times, we wrapped it up but not before I laid it all out to both of them like no other human being that they will ever meet for the rest of their lives. The meeting went well. They both agreed to disagree with us. I parted ways and shook his hand and bid Dr. George well and reminded Dr. Williams to remind her friends that Autism is a disease of electromagnetic exposure and not food allergies. It was clear to me she didn’t read it either.
The point of all of this is that The Fullerton Informer, much like a coin, has two sides. It can flip rather easily I might add. We simultaneously chose two parallel paths to deal with the same issue with two separate school districts based on the footings established by each district’s respective administrators. We took two roads. The high road was chosen in our dealings with the F.J.U.H.S.D. and Dr. George Giokaris as he began the journey by listening and applying the brake. The low road was taken with the F.S.D. and Dr. Robert Pletka as he began the journey by dismissing the information and stepping on the gas.
Heck we even took a side road along the way when we took our gig to the June 27th A.S.C.I.P meeting and they made us shut off our camera. It got a Bagley-Keene Act violation investigation going with the AG but at least I got to meet the big cheese attorney, and got to see the some familiar and some not so familiar faces that are all actively involved in flipping the switch to irradiate school kids all over the golden state.
Ironically, understanding full well, the nature of the command and control educational bureaucracy, the top down edicts from the Executive Branch down to the techs hanging those Cisco access points on the classroom walls down to the staff loading the Ipad cart, I knew that ultimately all involved would take the low road. I expected this even though some walked with me on the high road. You see folks, this is a big deal and in my opinion, there is no bigger deal than what I believe to be this insidious, stealth threat to if not an attack on our children’s fertility. The telecom laws protect the RF industry and the school officials, FCC exposure guidelines set 100 million times higher than some of the most cultured Europeans open the floodgates for the proliferation, Madison avenue has you and your kids hook line and sinker, and of course the CTA and CalPers have the golden handcuffs on the certificated staff to where they can’t say no even though the union contracts are strong enough for them all to simultaneously stand on top of and stop this. The administrators can’t break rank for fear of loss of reputation, fear of conflict with parents or superiors, or loss of their peace of mind having to wonder if they will be watched over like those trying to stop this by those trying to implement it at the highest levels. Sadly for some it is simply a religion relegated to merely fill the void. It is that void that the pursuit of the insatiable gods of materialism and status have left inside as their backs continue to turn on the children with the kids always coming last in all of the decisions. Don’t tell me they come first. I have read the contracts, the minutes and the agendas. Look at the payroll, look at the busted up black top, look at the benefits costs and look at the drinking fountains, look at the shortened school year and look at the class sizes, look at the administration costs and look at the fiddle playing the parents for everything under the sun, look at the paycheck and look at the lead pipes, look at the orthodontic plan and look at the asbestos tiles, look at the wireless health risks and look what your kids are using instead of text books. I could go on.
So as a result, the children are to be condemned for the rest of their lives to 24/7 microwave emissions in the classroom, in the gym, multipurpose room, library, restaurants, trains, airports, and at home for hours on end with these pulse modulated high frequency microwave transmitters sitting and emitting in their precious little laps in direct proximity to their sensitive developing reproductive areas. In return, everyone involved gets to get excited about all this Trojan horse called 21st century learning with the common core oozing out of its orifices, they mistakenly think that they get to keep their jobs, get to go wine tasting and eat bacon in Europe this summer all the while this stuff is going to put them all out of work someday sooner than they can imagine.
It has been my suspicion and contention all along that at the highest levels, this is part of an agenda to affect human fertility, specifically aimed at the female ovum in our young girls and the sperm in the pubescent boys with Autism merely being an unintended consequence. Think of where these devices are most of the time. THERE ARE NO LONG TERM STUDIES ON THIS ANYWHERE AND I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS BY DESIGN. THIS IS UNCHARTED TERRITORY FOLKS. Dr. Robert Pletka and Dr. George Giokaris just set sail with your kids on board. You wonder why they don’t want to sail the thing in my direction? I believe that they are afraid to stand up for the kids a midst this uncertainty. I have heard multiple administrators tell me that “Joe-all the districts are doing this… it is the way the world is going…” So if everyone is jumping off of the Brooklyn Bridge do we follow them?
When I look into the eyes of the staff, board members, and parents that are involved in this debate, I see fear, I see worry, I see shame. Everyone knows this stuff can’t be good. Few have the courage to stand up against it. It is easier to delve into the bottle or some other escape than to face this head on. Once you do try to face this reality, you have to come up against it all because this stuff is going in everywhere. But hey, are the kids not worth it? Like I have said in prior posts, some of the most foolish people that I have ever known were the most educated.
I knew all along that both roads would ultimately lead us to the same destination. I understand that it is easier to arrive if you take the road everyone else is on. You can’t get lost by yourself that way, you simply get lost with everyone else that way. For servile school administrators to trust in antiquated and inadequate FCC exposure guidelines that are 100 million times higher than those of some Europeans that ignore an entire realm of effects, to not personally investigate the issue and relegate the researching to their insurance companies and risk managers, to keep looking the other way and ignore piles and piles of scientific studies and evidence warning of the potential dangers to the children of unprecedented pulse modulated microwave high frequency radiation levels in Fullerton’s classrooms that are trillions of times higher than the levels 50 years ago that our parents lived with, in my opinion is despicable. I believe that we might as well stick Bob and George in a mold and make rubber stamps out of both of them.
We may not know for years, uttered Dr. Giokaris, We will not know until it is too late says I. Based on the decisions of these two men, who dealt with the two sides of my coin, and walked two different roads on the way, they ended up arriving at the same conclusions which, in my opinion, translates to heads or tails, the kids lose.
Ladies and gentlemen, now that the high and the low roads have come together, the merge sign is in the rear view mirror, with the two roads having converged, may I suggest that all of you look in the rear view mirror and out in front, and be aware of what I have known all along, that the road is slippery when wet. You have been warned. I believe that precaution has been thrown to the wind by these two leaders in spite of the many speed limit and warning signs posted right in front of them along the way. In my opinion, they have willfully chosen to roll the dice with your children’s reproductive health. Do they have that right? Absolutely not!
We will now move to even further expand our information campaign to the parents of the students in the F.J.U.H.S.D. as well as the F.S.D. and the community at large. We welcome you all to this critical debate that is worthy of as much lighting, signage, caution and attention that is humanly capable of being employed and invested so that we can begin ending the largest radiation experiment on children that world has ever known. Fasten your seat belts. Give us your two cents worth, stay tuned and please don’t touch that dial.
The RF Industry gets what it pays for. Will your children end up paying for what they get in the FSD’s and the FJUHSD’s wireless classrooms?
Yes the R.’s have it but not for much longer. You know folks, I believe that the Fullerton School District parents and children deserve better than R. Schulze, the F.S.D.’s self proclaimed “attack dog of truth” in this fight, R. Pletka, the F.S.D.’s superintendent and what we believe to be his misleading safety assurances, and of course the slick moves of R. Craven, the soon to be ex F.S.D. technology director.
What we believe is on the line are your children’s reproductive and physical health, cognitive function and critical thinking skills’ development in that order.
There are clearly two sides to this debate. On one side it involves an entrenched trillion dollar industry involving companies like APPLE, CISCO, and GOOGLE with orders from The Executive Branch to roll this out, along with servile school administrators and staff who appear to be unable to wrap their arms around the other side of the story or simply refuse to expose themselves to it. On the other side of the aisle are thousands of peer reviewed articles and the scientists behind them, flanked by parents that simply see the forest for the trees, sound the alarm and say no. So the ten thousand dollar question is why do the teachers, board members, administrators, staff, PTA and foundations all appear to have blindfolds on and earplugs in? We now begin to peel back the layers of the proverbial onion for you.
This just came in from Ray, one of our commenters that dares to care and dares to tell it like it is. With his logging thousands of hours of research on this issue spanning over 20 years, and his flagship website WIFI IN SCHOOLS.COM , he writes:
“Parents deserve quality information, not heavily biased industry-influenced reporting from a hack website. For the past several months we’ve been reading post after post by this R. Schulze individual. He’s been providing links to scientific reports claiming that EMR radiation is not a health issue.
Schulze has consistently refused to acknowledge any and all scientific evidence that reports EMR radiation to be harmful. He just pretends that it doesn’t exist, and instead refers us to links provided by a website called “EMF and Health”. This site is blatantly biased, and promotes a denialist perspective.
Well I did some digging on this website and learned founded by an electronics tycoon by the name of Lorne Trottier.
Trottier, who has deep ties to the wireless industry, financed an operation to public deny the hazards of EMR radiation and the validity of electro-sensitivity. He hired 60 academics, mostly from McGill University and Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, to which he has donated tens of millions of dollars.
Another of EMF and Health’s contributors is Michel Plante, a consultant for Hydro Quebec, one of the largest electrical utilities in Canada.
Joe Schwarz of EMF and Health is also a known industry shill who not only defends the safety of EMF, but also the safety of Aspartame, pesticides, and GMO, etc, for companies the like of Monsanto. Schwartz is also the Director of McGill University’s Office for Science and Society, which is “dedicated to demystifying science for the public”, and which receives millions in funding from the Lorne Trottier family trust.
Parents deserve to have high quality scientific information and should be warned that the pro-EMF site Schulze has been referring to is anything but independent science.”
DON’T BANK YOUR FAMILY’S LINEAGE AND YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH ON EMPTY PROMISES BY THOSE WHO WILL LONG SINCE BE RETIRED IF IT TURNS OUT THAT WE WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ALL HAVE SKIN IN THIS GAME, AND THE REASON WE AT THE FULLERTON INFORMER DO IS SO THAT YOUR CHILDREN WON’T.
GET INFORMED AND GET INVOLVED.
The FCC allows for 100 MILLION more times the microwave exposure than The Austrian Medical Association recommends.
It is truly a tale of two cities. Yes indeed folks, yes indeed and oceans apart. The Fullerton School District’s Board of Trustees, administrators, principals, teachers, staff and even most of the PTA groups and Foundations are all aware of what we are attempting to stop which is what we believe to be the extremely dangerous forced irradiation of our school children with pulse modulated high frequency microwave emissions to run these totally unnecessary wireless classrooms. My son, who is not using a microwave transmitter at this time as participation is OPTIONAL if you were not aware, tells me it seems like game day every day. All this just so the kids can play games on their Ipads? He finishes with pencil and paper far ahead of his classmates on problems and assignments. He said the other kids get to play games on their Ipads often and everyday. That is certainly what is going on at the Morningside afterschool day care since WiFi was installed recently as well at the behest of the parents ostensibly so the children can do their homework on the Ipads. Ask the staff. It is game day everyday over there now thanks to Mr. Pletka. His agenda has spilled over into the infant care centers now.
Well there was a time when my wife and I would walk in to the day care facility and see all the kids at the tables with their pencils in hand and their noses in their books doing their homework. Well at least the director has partially followed my advice by shutting off the WiFi until the kids get there in the afternoon sparing the infants, preschoolers and the kindergarten late birds the needless and dangerous RF exposure. Oh I forgot, it is all about the common core. You know even as of today, 6 months into this thing, still not one single solitary servile FSD employee has had the courage or decency to break rank and stand up for these kids. It is amazing what a paltry paycheck and a few bucks will do to peoples’ consciences. Ignoring thousands of peer reviewed scientific studies that show harmful effects and sicking an unqualified attack dog on us to obfuscate the issue is not what the children deserve.
So what gives with the folks across the Atlantic deeming 100 MILLION times less microwave radiation exposure as being the upper limit on safe exposure? What do they know that we don’t? Why are their Autism rates one third of the US? How could there be a 100,000,000 variation? THAT IS TOTALLY INSANE.
It can only amount to one of several possibilities. The first is that they know something that we don’t. It is also possible that our government knows something that they know but don’t want us to know, or lastly no one knows anything and they pulled the 10 to 8th power odds off of the back of a powerball ticket. Somewhere in the middle is the Bio Initiative report that the wireless industry and the academia bobble heads pick apart with their RF industry sharpened Pinocchio schnozes. Those folks are a bit more liberal than those from that far land across the sea at the center of culture and wealth at a recommendation of 30,000 times less exposure. Who are these folks? They are scientists. Who are folks at the Austrian Medical Association? They are doctors who happen to live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Who are the folks at the FCC? Well it is simply a regulatory agency. It is not a public health agency. They don’t have one single medical doctor on its entire payroll. So what do they give us? They give us EXPOSURE GUIDELINES 100 million times higher than the Austrians and to add insult to injury, they get themselves off the hook because the guidelines are NOT SAFETY STANDARDS.
How can something so important, be given to chance? How do we have people with Ed.D’s who demand to be called docktahs, people with MBA’s, and risk managers looking the other way while these disparities are glaring them in the face with me at the microphone every two weeks and me passing out fliers in the parking lots every chance they provide me a captive audience making crucial health decisions for 15,000 school children. These folks have appeared to demonstrate that they themselves don’t even understand these numbers by allowing the THE FSD’s RF report and press release to stand with what I believe to be preposterous readings and false and misleading statements of total safety. They just follow orders. If it is legal and the order comes down, they simply flip the switch. We are not getting what we pay for but we are certainly getting what we deserve if no one dares to speak up for these kids.
I firmly believe that these wildly varying numbers clearly show that the meaning of the FSD’s very own superintendent Robert Pletka’s claim that this is “totally safe for the children” is merely based on what I believe to be his extremely limited understanding of the issue, and a mere subjective interpretation of the facts. Ladies and gentlemen, that is simply a chance that none of us should be willing to take with our most valuable assets who happen to be our own children.
WHAT ABOUT THE KIDS? THE FCC’S WIRELESS RADIATION EXPOSURE GUIDELINES IGNORE AN ENTIRE REALM OF EFFECTS: THE NON-THERMAL EFFECTS.
WELL I GUESS IT DEPENDS ON WHO YOU ASK NOW DOESN’T IT?
DOES THE EPA’S OWN SCIENTIST AGREE? http://thefullertoninformer.
I beleive that FSD’s very own Robert Pletka’s wireless classroom safety assurance: http://fsd.k12.ca.us/parent_resources/files/wireless.pdf is a house of cards ladies and gentlemen.
Lets not forget what is keeping them up at night, and maybe even you too as studies have shown that invisible microwave electromagnetic radiation from WiFi, laptops, tablets and cell phones inhibit the production of a hormone called melatonin. Melatonin is produced by the pineal gland in the brain and one of its primary functions is to regulate our sleep cycle. When inadequate amounts of melatonin are produced our sleep cycle is compromised.
Why is this important? If you don’t get into the deeper phases of the sleep cycle at night the body cannot repair itself. Cells aren’t rejuvenated. Sleep is necessary for growth as well this repair process to occur and we all need it, especially our children.
Here is a letter from a local parent sent to all governing authorities involved in this issue:
I am a Southern California mother of three and have a child in a school that is implementing one to one technology in the classroom. It was not until I stumbled upon information regarding wireless radiation that I became aware of the extremely critical health implications of such an environment in which 30+ wireless devices, operating 6 hours/day, 180 days/year for a child’s school career, are emitting an unprecedented amount of radiation on our children. In the process, I discovered a bottomless pit of studies and information that attest to the harms of wireless radiation.
The parents do not know that they are sending their children into an environment, surrounded by a Class 2b Carcinogen, classified as such by the World Health Organization. That is the same classification as lead, DDT, and engine exhaust. In what context would a classroom filled with engine exhaust ever be okay? The parents do not know that medical doctors, scientists, and researchers are identifying the following wireless radiation health effects: ADHD, autism, infertility, DNA damage to human sperm, childhood leukemia, neurological and cardiovascular problems, cognitive disfunction, pain, fatigue, mood disorders, dizziness, nausea, weakness, and skin problems. The question is: what is this wireless radiation doing to the human eggs in our daughters? Additionally, many of these health problems are not immediately evident and manifest themselves years after exposure, which makes everyone think that there are no harms from these emissions. The parents do not know that research into wireless radiation has been going on for decades and has yielded thousands of studies indicating harm: http://www.justproveit.net/content/prove-it-initiative-main
The parents do not know that something that they cannot see, hear, touch, smell or taste is a danger to their children. The parents do not know the numerous websites that have cropped up addressing just the subject of wireless classrooms:
WiFi In Schools, United States
WiFi In Schools, United Kingdom
WiFi In Schools, Australia
Citizens 4 Safe Technology
Center For Safer Wireless
Safe In School
School Radiation Dot Com
The time is past due for the FCC to acknowledge the dangers of wireless radiation. Wireless technology has an implied safety that is dangerous and not justified. People, if they were aware of this information, would feel that there is immediate need for the FCC to step in and re-establish guidelines to ensure the public health.
The general population will begin finding out the following facts about the FCC’s role in allowing the unfettered proliferation of wireless radiation on our children and loved ones:
1) The FCC guidelines were last updated in 1996; that was 17 years ago. Why is that?
2) The FCC guidelines are based on thermal exposure and completely ignore non-thermal biological effects. Why is that? Non- thermal effects are the concern with wireless radiation.
3) No long-term studies have been funded on the non-thermal effects of wireless radiation. Why is that?
4) FCC current exposure guidelines allow for hundreds of trillions of times more exposure than our parents were exposed to as children. Why is that?
Parents are unknowingly sending their children back to school this Fall into classrooms filled with wireless radiation and there is no choice in the matter. These decisions are being made for the parents. School districts, when confronted with the harms of wireless classrooms, ignore or discount it because it conflicts with their one to one technology plans. They stand on the FCC’s guidelines and tech industry funded studies as reason for safety and are dismissive of parents raising concerns. Wired technology is known to be safe and a healthy choice for our children. Why take the risk with our children’s health with wireless?
Parents and the general public are trusting in the FCC to be taking care of this and, clearly, with 1996 guidelines, that is not the case. In the schools, knowledgeable parents are caught between administrators who falsely proclaim wireless radiation as “totally safe”, that there is no “absolute proof” of the harms of wireless radiation, resting on outdated FCC guidelines, and, what is now, decades of research that says it is not.
Please consider the application of the Precautionary Principle, as stated by Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director, Center for Family and Community Health, University of California, Berkeley, in a letter dated February 8, 2013, to the Los Angeles Unified School District writes: “The precautionary principle should be applied to this critical policy decision. This principle, developed at a U.N. environmental conference in 1992 states that in the absence of scientific consensus if an action has a suspected risk of causing harm, the burden of proof it is not harmful falls on those taking the action, and all reasonable measures to reduce the risk must be taken.” Our school children should not be in classrooms with wireless radiation until it can be proved that it is safe.
The urgency of this matter cannot be overstated. The health issues of wireless radiation are not going away. Many of these issues, such as dramatic growth rates of autism diagnosis and ADHD, are unaccounted for. The causes have not been identified. Our rate in Orange County CA is now 1 in 63. The FCC has a tremendous responsibility and a great opportunity to step forward and do the right thing. Please, incorporate the Precautionary Principle in the FCC guidelines, now, and call a halt to wireless radiation in our classrooms until it can be proven safe.
Finally, what does it say about us if we, as human beings, do not ensure the safety of our most vulnerable, our children?
THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT’S RADIATION EXPERIMENT ON OUR CHILDREN NEEDS TO COME TO AN END IMMEDIATELY!
PLEASE CONTACT THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT PLETKA AND DEMAND THAT HE TURN THESE INDUSTRIAL WIFI SYSTEMS OFF IN ALL OF THE CLASSROOMS.
This new paper that asserts the reproductive systems of girls and boys is being adversely affected by exposure to microwave radiation from wireless technology. http://
We send our children to school ostensibly to be educated. They are taught to read, write, add, subtract, multiply, divide, learn about the environment, the sciences, physics, and the like. It is the great hope of many that their children will become a great leader, discover a miracle cure, or solve some of the toughest of humanity’s problems. What awaits them is brick wall a million miles tall and a caste system that some of you worship just because it works for you.
It is only when you realize that this is all for naught as at the highest levels, the causes and cures for every ailment afflicting this planet are known, suppressed and kept under lock and key, that you will understand the order out of chaos method to the madness. It involves the highest levels of government and academia creating deep dark rabbit holes that they send the brightest of our offspring down to search out what they have hidden and keeping the rest of us in the dark with infinite mindless diversions.
In terms of those of you who think otherwise, I believe that it is your willful ignorance attempting to appease your conscience. You are in fact training your children to blindly serve the very same system and machinations that we are attempting to thwart. Unbeknownst to you parents, you are a just another brick in the wall, and a cog in its wheel.
Life’s greatest problems are not complex. In fact their solutions are extremely simple. The upper echelons of the power structure make it appear that simple solutions are impossible thereby guaranteeing an infinitely expensive treadmill system whereby the brightest and sharpest minds are worn down and redirected to areas which serve the propagation specialists’ interests of this sick joke being played on us, our children, and our parents.
The insanity of it all goes along the lines of like getting into a car accident, taking your car to the body shop, and they try to find out what happened to the car by looking inside the gas tank instead of looking at the obvious. Ladies and gentleman, that is how the compartmentalized scientific community and its directed research system works. They are directed to ignore the causes and focus research strictly on managing diseases by those who hold the purse strings. Those that do have been here more than once.
This is why we have petrochemical poison pharmaceuticals up the ying yang, sick people coming out of our ears falling apart all around us, brain damaged kids coming out of the chute and glass temples called medical facilities with white coated high priests arrogantly roaming around speaking pig latin to the poor victims who have all all of their appendages permanently stuck to the petrochemical pharmaceutical fly paper. We are then told that we need to keep searching for solutions which keeps EVERYONE looking for solutions from everywhere from here to there to Tippety Square while the whole time, the solutions are right under our noses.
The solution is called PREVENTION. It is simple in word and in deed. Prevention means getting rid of the crap in cupboard, canning the carbonated cans of crap in the fridge, breaking the love affair with the booze bottle, bailing out on the dependence on the pill bottles, ending your disastrous love affair with all of the microwave transmitters’ electromagnetic poisoning properties all over your home and your children’s classrooms, filtering your water, calling their bluff on the color of law injection mandates until sanity resumes in their production and administration, and taking your eyes and ears of off the idiot box long enough to realize that they have named it after what they have attempted to make you and your children become. It can be done. The choice is simple, the steps are arduous, but the end of which is freedom from bondage to the system of fear by which they control, shape and break the apple of God’s eye, the pinnacle of His creation, you and I.
Their attempts to reset the compass that occurs naturally in us will fail for the key percentage of us that is required to effect change. The real irony here can be found with the public officials, members of the clergy, those in academia, school administrators and all of their worshipers whose children are headed for the same future as the children of some of those that they remarkably hold in derision.
Ladies and gentlemen we have a truly unmitigated public health disaster on so many fronts on our hands that is currently yielding an unmitigated economic disaster the likes of which the world has never seen. The social engineers at the highest levels are no respecter of persons. I do not believe that it is an accident. In a macabre sense, it is truly ironic indeed.
The joke is on our children unless we wake up and break this vicious cycle that spirals all the more rapidly downward with each so called advance in our society which in reality sets us back several generations at a time. Life is really simple, its problems are rooted in simplicity being exchanged for complexity and the solutions are rooted in basic common sense principles. I believe that our educational system is training up your children to look at life as being a complex undertaking with no simple solutions and only complex compliance routines. The whole time, on your dime, in my opinion, the servile school administrators willfully and knowingly remain the driving force behind some of the most damaging threats to public health and our society in history such as largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever seen, the color of law forced vaccination programs, and the destruction of the last vestiges of our childrens’ critical thinking skills by their forced immersion into a two dimensional world of wireless tablets, condemned to become nothing more than list verifiers. To those that wish this upon our children, they are laughing all the way to the bank. Rome is burning folks, right before our very eyes. Would all of you please open yours.
You know it isn’t often that a spark of love comes our way from the good old Madison Avenue crew. This one is white hot. August has always been good to me as I am a gardener in case you didn’t know. This year the horn of plenty came through again as it has been a rather mild summer in some respects and one that has been literally hotter than hell in others.
The summer of 2013 really heated up with some shocking revelations we put out right here in our own backyard. So all this business of, let’s just say, fertilization and the plants version, pollination have something radically in common with our efforts to expose the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever seen and it has gotten me just a little, let’s just say, hot under the collar with all of the glossy, high priced obfuscation and disinformation.
I love to read. I read all kinds of books, blogs, newspapers, labels, stock charts, ingredient lists, lyrics, screenplays, and even magazines. As it never fails, I just happened to stumble across quite an anomaly last week during my perusal of a magazine rack at my local library. Time magazine with back to back issues really caught my eye something fierce to say the least.
So let’s get to the meat and potatoes shall we. As parents, we all want to someday become grandparents. Here is where it gets interesting. As an avid gardener, I want my satsuma plum tree to be pollinated by my santa rosa plum and bees do the job. For the grapes, I can let the wind take care of my concord, norton, niabell, and my zinfandel but the citrus like the mandarins and the valencias, they need the bees too. For Joe Imbriano to become a grandpa someday, my kids need the birds and the bees. So why all the fuss, and what’s the tie in to the wireless classroom issue?
Madison Avenue is at it again turning out a piece like the recent issue of Time Magazine where I believe they are really trying to improve the eugenicists’ closing ratios by touting “The Childfree Life” as the new way to fly. Granted kids are tough but hey, as we were, so shall they be. Heck, it’s a good thing this article came out long after I was born: http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20130812,00.html
It really got me thinking that with all of the impacts to human fertility that all this wireless radiation is having on us, I just wonder what the heck it is doing to my favorite berries and plums, I mean no bees, no berries, no plums. When was the last time you had a ripe one right off of the tree with the sheen unblemished? Money cannot buy that taste in the store because they come in from far, far away, picked green, gassed with ethylene and they trick you with the deceptive color and wax job only to later disappoint you with that horrid flavor. The best things in life are still free. I digress.
So anyway, what is going on with the bees? Inquiring minds want to know and as it turns out, I believe that Time Magazine in their infinite wisdom wants you to know what they want you to know : “A World Without Bees“ http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20130819,00.html. So let me get this straight. First a world without children and then a world without bees. This couldn’t possibly have anything to do with all of these microwave towers and rooftop arrays that are popping like whorehouses in the old mining towns now could it? What about all the tablets, phones, monitors, and the like.Well, actually, I believe that it does. Is the same microwave exposure mechanism at work in the bees as in Autism? http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/ I believe that their antennae arrays are no match for the resonance effects of these pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation emissions. I also believe that by the interaction of wireless microwave radiation emissions which directly decrease the opening frequency of nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor ion channels in the bees, thereby exponentially increasing the neurotoxicity of the most widely utilized class of pesticides in the world, the Neonicotinoid neuro-active insecticides, they are not only getting resonance induced disorientation but they are also being poisoned. This renders the bees immunocompromised and as a result, they eventually succumb to what would otherwise be non lethal pathogenic exposures and die en masse.
Tonight at Acacia elementary, we got the pitch for the classroom microwave transmitters by the teacher while the principal and one of the FSD honchos in the audience looked onto what appeared to be some pitch by a rookie reading from an old MLM script from my old soap selling days. Just like back them, not everyone’s buyin’ it.
You know, like Autism, they blame genes and everything else except for the obvious, like infertility they blame genes and everything else but the obvious, like atrial fibrillation, they blame a $2000 a month heart and blood pressure pill deficiency and ignore the obvious. For all of this chronic inflamation, they blame osteo this or rheumatoid that instead of the obvious EMF exposure and its elevated copper level signature. Why not? It is good for business at least according to the allopaths. They don’t want to hear any of this much like the school district officials.
So now the bees, yes the bees. So the experts, the gift that keeps on giving, blame pests and pesticides that have been around for eons and everything else but the obvious? What is the obvious? Microwave wireless radiation? Of course. Have you hugged a tower lately? So why does the wireless industry get to bring the microwave levels up a few trillion times higher than they were 50 years ago everywhere even in the children’s classrooms with the blessing of the FCC? This inquiring mind wants your inquiring minds to know that quite possibly what is hidden in plain view is nothing more than a pathetic sales pitch for the childless life as a result of the end of the birds and the bees.
They make it sound like a choice and I am here to tell you that I believe that unless you all wake up, that choice is being made for your children as well as for the little things that buzz around that we take for granted and will not survive without. The bees are the canary in the coal mine. Folks if these wireless emissions do what I suspect they do, that is to, in my opinion, damage the female eggs, and the male sperm, then maybe a world without bees will be just fine because it will also be a world without people.
Why does it always appear that Madison Avenue has to always hide it in plain view, put a spin on it, give the guilty a pass, and the gullible the shaft? I believe it is just so folks like you and I who can still see the forest for the trees, will stay on our toes, remain on our game and do what our parents did; immigrate across oceans, work long hours, struggle against all odds, just for you and I to have a chance and our kids to have a chance for a turn at the oldest game in the world: The birds and the bees. ‘
For their sake and our children’s sake, let’s keep this alive and say no. Wires are not that bad ladies and gentleman. Towers, routers, and wireless access points being installed everywhere behind our backs, including our children’s classrooms, our workplaces, and even in our bedrooms, while they tell us that it is all safe is no way to ensure that what makes the world go round will keep it spinning. May God open our eyes and have mercy on us for what we are doing to His plan for His wonderful creation and it’s magical way of keeping it all going: The birds and the bees. TIME, yes it is time folks, it is time to not let it end.
This story came to me from one of my trusted advisors late last night. The case for suing parents who don’t vaccinate their kids—or criminally charging them. Never you mind that the vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued if their product kills or injures your child. Oh yes, the Feds have a program to take care of you alright, but with Big Pharma stacking the deck with all of their bought and paid for scientists and their black robe buddies we get the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Yes, it is a one way street with speed bumps for the parents and a five lane highway for Big Pharma. You guessed it. Only those that have spent at least a decade or longer under the influence of Big Pharma’s priesthood can tell us what is true and what is not. No one dares to listen to anyone else. If you are not a scientist or unless you are sporting a few funny letters after your last name, you are a crackpot like me. They will just ignore you. Well, the push back has begun and the bioethicists, the eugenicists and the drug pushers are getting scared. You know they are worried when they take it to the airwaves and jam it down our throats on the Twonky.
Boy, do we have a tale of two cities set right before our very eyes with truly amazing times indeed on the idiot box with anti vaccine Jenny McCarthy set to hit The View on 9-9 as a sort of keep your eye off the wireless/autism connection http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/ red herring. On the other side of the aisle, we have the Law and Order hit piece, and good old Barry Boy picking up the rear on the saw dust trail with the push to vaccinate everyone with his free for all health plan. It really ties in rather nicely to what we are dealing with in terms of implied consent, informed consent and the potential dangers of the wireless radiation exposure to our children in the classrooms and the real enforcement arm of the convergence of these agendas: The Public School System and its soon to be two dimensional list verifying learning system.
So this begs the question. Who is really endangering who? What is really being endangered? Is it public health, our children’s reproductive capabilities, critical thinking, or more? With eyes wide shut, with their color of law mandates, and their rank and file robots, what is really endangering the “herd”? I will attempt to address it below. Let us begin with the following questions:
35 shots by age 6?
So if these injections really work then what’s with the push?
What on earth is really in those things?
Aren’t these diseases rarely fatal in healthy properly nourished human beings including children?
There is the catch phrase: healthy human beings. By design that euphemism to describe us and our children has become something of an urban legend. Think I am kidding? Look around, I mean really don’t kid yourself and look around.
You know when pathogens forcibly enter the body by-passing the natural defenses such as the multiple layers of epidermis, salivary and friendly bacterial attack in the mouth, lodging in the nostrils and being sneezed out, being coughed out or vomitted out, instead heading straight for the bloodstream by being injected deep and directly into our bloodstream through a syringe with an adjuvant hitch hiking along with nano tech compounds and modified trans species genetic materials, toxic chemicals and preservatives that even according to Darwin himself would never find their way inside us, it ends up kind of like a Steely Dan song or a even a bad concert with the exits blocked. Sanitation, running water, nutrition, heating, improved air quality and access to nutritious foods all have nothing to do with ending diseases, only the vaccines have saved humanity.
Here we go, take a deep breath- it’s a run on.
Before I can even begin to answer that and before I can even consider rolling up my children’s sleeves to the white coats, and before the black robes even get involved, I just realized that you need to know that they really keep us all in the dark by design, literally telling us to stay out of the evil dangerous sun, slathering toxic sunscreen all over the largest organ in our bodies that absorbs 90% of what we put on it-the skin, with UV blocking contact lenses and sunglasses blocking the most efficient Vitamin D manufacturing process in the universe, while they feed the youngest of the herd (your newborn children) coffee creamer, talcum powder synthetic vitamin beverages that they call infant formula in place of mother’s milk, for the adult members of the herd (you and I) bone and tooth dissolving aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose laced beverages along side the trichinosis laden, drugged, GMO corn-fed swine sausages for breakfast, GMO corn-fed, antibiotic laden, hemorrhagic e-coli hamburgers for lunch with the dimethyl polysiloxane soaked fries, franken-fruits and vegetables fertilized with sewage sludge,toxic liquids whose farm tanks on standby have skull and crossbones on them, nerve agent pesticides misted from the air with the atrazene dusters, dumped into the soil with soakers, all the while they have us growing inedible plants spraying roundup all over our now rendered toxically useless yards, mercury laden high fructose corn syrup for dessert, SRI’s for the misdiagnosed hypoglycemics, pig insulin for those that have abandoned the consumption of a broad spectrum of sugars for the high fructose diet option, 5-FU for the nitriloside deficient dependents, synthetic vitamins to keep the imbalance going from the industrial waste, trace pharmaceutical laden municipal water supply laced with a myriad of toxic compounds they pawn off on us as disinfectants, trans fat delectables from the drive-thru for dinner, HCL blockers that send undigested food south on us, highly addictive opiate liver eating pain killers for our pleasure, a steady diet of PDE5 inhibitors coupled with satanic, violent pornographic movies and cartoons with accelerant and pesticide laden wines, bone dissolving belly busting beer, age accelerating ales, and dark, wild, witches brewed hard liquor exotic spirits for the nightcap, petrochemical pharmaceutical grade sleep aids for the WiFi, wireless microwave nightstand cordless phone base station, router emitting to the laptop or tablet between the legs wireless radiation exposure induced sleep depriving out of whack melatonin levels and they want to make sure they don’t miss a beat with the bioethicists eugenics fantasy hots for our blood stream by freaking out everyone by going after their wallet and pumping our kids full of who knows what all in the name of public health? Whew! Deep breath-there, I said it.
Well why not? Apparently we already are pumping our kids and ourselves full of who knows what but there is one difference folks. This is all by your choice. It is a free country, or is it?
Well I guess in light of how the masters believe that the herd cannot maintain its health on its own given the poor choices that it is directed to make by Madison Avenue, Big Brother’s inverted food pyramid, at the behest of the trusted medical establishment hacks, irrespective of the massive leaps forward in sanitation and the miraculous logistics of food distribution with healthy food choices literally staring us in the face wrapping themselves around the entire perimeter of these glorified liquor stores called supermarkets whose center aisles contain all the poisons, it is no wonder that we must take the injections.
HAS YOUR DOCTOR OR YOUR CHILD’S PEDIATRICIAN EVER DISCUSSED ANY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED WITH YOU?
They say that we must inject and comply. I say that we dare not and refuse to ignore this miraculous creation by Almighty God, the human body. It is the most complete, efficient, incredible machine in the universe sporting its 75,000 miles of circulatory system, its own thermostat, water and fuel pump, defense department, and super computer between the ears that on any given day, only uses about 3% of its capacity. I say we listen to it, take care of it, trust it, trust The One who put it together, follow His instruction manual and tap the other 97% of the available hard drive when needed. I never put soybean oil in my car’s gas tank. Why do we allow the control freaks in public health, medicine, academia, and the media to convince us to do the equivalent to our bodies with all of the aforementioned?
Allopathic medicine has its place folks. Don’t get me wrong. It just doesn’t have its place EVERYWHERE, it should not have a monopoly on the system of care and it should not be preeminent. These folks in the embossed white coats that think they know it all couldn’t create a blade of grass in a lab from scratch if their lives depended on it. They don’t have all of the answers and most of the ones that they do have are wrong anyway.
Can we please step back and start with at least a water filter, open the windows, ride a bike, and plant some fruit trees or a garden? Why can’t we have good clean water, fresh air, good clean real food,sunlight, a clean bloodstream, and an uncompromised immune system?
Well of course we can, but it is your choice, but not according to the experts. We are a HERD, mind you-their herd or so they delusionally think. Herds cannot think for themselves and cannot take care of themselves. Herds must be fed, subdued, curtailed, corralled, controlled eventually always culled. So the masters feed us their toxic fake food, subdue us with their 24/7 fear mongering, kinky 300 channel idiot box circus, curtail us by endowing extreme powers to criminalize the most menial aberrations in human behavior, empower the myopic control freaks with an educational caste system, control us with petrochemical poisons in the food water and mentally disorienting microwave emissions in the air, and culled, yes culled by in my opinion, what can only be described as the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known and the potential effects on fertility coupled with the inoculation programs that work lockstep in leaving no stone un-turned.
Is there any room in this run on sentence filled rant to tie in to Pletka and company’s hiding this form http://www.cdph.ca.gov/pubsforms/forms/ctrldforms/pm286b.pdf from the parents by not including it in the enrollment packets?
How about their radiation experiment on the Fullerton School District’s children all the way down to the 5 year olds that just spilled over into the infant care centers, preschools, and before and after school day care facilities as a direct result of Pletka’s wireless classroom edicts that are being slickly packaged and peddled to the unsuspecting parents? Yes there is. I just don’t know if it is the frozen middle layer or the microwaved icing on this hellish cake but I do know that this is what they plan to jam down our throats and call progress and a necessity. I don’t care if this wireless stuff is being put in everywhere. If everyone started jumping off of the Brooklyn Bridge, does that mean we all should too? This whole thing is garnished and served up on a platter with two aspirin to all of the unsuspecting masses who daily suffer from a TV, technology, sports, sugar, shopping, alcohol or the I am so smart, bitchin, and full of myself academia condesenscion hangover. Look folks, this crap won’t go down easy if you are awake, on your game and on your toes. We aim to help you get back into and back on yours if you can remember where you left off and where they are.
As far as answering those two questions from the start of the article:
35 shots by age 6? Why the push? What on earth is really in those things? Why are they jamming all of this wireless technology down our throats? What if this push to inject and irradiate us and our children was really part of a clandestine program to adversely impact ours and our children’s cognitive function, physical health and fertility? By the looks of what they are doing to everyone right now with the food, water, media and medicine, nothing really surprises me anymore. They just print the money, give us cheap toxic imitation food, endless mindless entertainment, our kids hellish cartoons, demonic blood thirst highly addictive digital crack video games, debaucherous role models with half naked women everywhere, put everyone on pills, dope and booze all in order to physically and emotionally wear us down, morally compromise us, and make everyone act like animals so someday, THEY CAN TREAT US LIKE ANIMALS. I believe that there is a tiny, powerful segment of the population whose worldview is diametrically opposed to that of the unsuspecting simple people like you and I that just want to be left alone and raise our families. Yeah yeah call me a conspiracy theorist and I will call those that forcibly inject, drug and irradiate our children eugenicists.
I beleive that they operate in stealth fashion under the premise that most people believe that such a plan is just a conspiracy theory. Sounds like the perfect crime to me. So in the meantime, I can only wildly speculate and nothing remotely positive comes to mind. We are not in the dark ages, with raw sewage in the streets and rats and disease running rampant. We are not faced with the plagues, just public health color of law mandates connected to syringes. Why? Simply look around for what is running rampant, that is the obvious unprecedented decline in public health, most alarmingly, our children’s. It is certainly headed that way as the same people on the boards of these food companies that are screwing everyone up are also sitting on boards of the tobacco and drug companies finishing off the job. Remember the third leading cause of death in this country is MD directed treatment. The first two leading causes are all indirectly caused by the affiliates of the third. Ah yes from the cradle to the grave, the injection love fest begins in the warmer and ends with embalmer’s.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are on the verge of forced vaccination and forced irradiation. What you are witnessing is full circle command and control, all exits covered, body, soul, mind and spirit or so the masters think. Not so fast. We still have and I still love that two letter word that still works wonders, moves mountains and can sometimes spare us from enduring the most unconscionable circumstances-The Word-NO. Mixed with common sense we must implore for Almighty God to help us to use it wisely and courageously as needed especially when it comes to our children. Look yours in the eyes tonight and remember to trust no one and question everything. These are perilous times ladies and gentlemen.
BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND, JUST IN TIME FOR THE 1:1 WIRELESS DEVICE ROLL OUT FOR ALL 5TH AND 6TH GRADERS AT ACACIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
If you have access to an EMF detector which we at the Fullerton Informer do, if you take measurements of the microwave emissions of an in use cell phone and compare them to the emissions of a WiFi enabled tablet or laptop, how do you think they will compare? The reality is that they actually in some cases exceed a cell phone’s microwave radiation emissions.
No one would conceivably allow 35 children to sit next to each other in an small room while talking on their cell phones for 6 hours a day, would they? This is precisely why this is our specific area of concern. Students using their WiFi enabled tablets or laptops for upwards of 6 hours a day at school and several more hours at home on or in direct proximity to their laps could possibly actually receive equal or more microwave radiation exposure than if they were talking on a cell phone for that duration of time. High powered routers that are potentially hundreds of times more powerful than the home use versions coupled with 35+ WiFi enabled devices up and running easily compound the measured emissions. That is effectively the scenario being played out with our children in our chic, nouveau, wireless classrooms. Do you think this won’t affect your children? Think again. The pilot programs are being expanded and soon enough all the children will have one in their laps. Ask the school administrators as that is their plan. Maybe you embrace this technology? Please read on and PLEASE READ THE PRECEDING POSTS AND VIEW THE LINKS ASSOCIATED. FOR THE RECORD, I AM BY NO MEANS OPPOSED TO TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOMS. I SIMPLY SUPPORT HARD WIRING THE DEVICES AS THE ONLY SAFE ALTERNATIVE. HARDWIRED CONNECTIONS ARE CLEARLY SAFER, MORE SECURE AND FAR MORE RELIABLE THAN WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY.
As adults, we would never contemplate keeping an in use cell phone glued to our head all day and for a few hours at night, unless we were forced to participate in some bizarre experiment. Something deep down tells all of us that this would be plain stupid and outright dangerous. One wouldn’t tolerate this behavior in developing young children. This begs the question. Where are the safety studies on young children being exposed 6 hours a day, 180 days a year for upwards of 13
K-12 years, packed 35 to a room with the wireless tablets or laptops radiating in direct proximity to their sensitive developing reproductive areas? http://www.scribd.com/doc/63259328/Electrosmog-and-male-fertility-134-references
The current ICNIRP’s safety guidelines for radio frequency exposures were only developed to protect healthy adult males from acute burning exposures lasting 6 minutes. All the scientific research to date have no studies on young children in this setting with this level of exposure. Don’t buy into the “radio waves have been going through us for decades” line. That is by no means a relevant analogy. The intensity, frequency and distance to the source are by no means remotely analagous and no, the sun’s rays are not the same as a cell phone’s emissions. All of this amounts to, in my opinion, a massive experiment in truly UNCHARTED TERRITORY involving our children. The debate has been ongoing but it is now time for it to take center stage in The Fullerton School District.
Ask your school administrators for the studies which comprise the basis for their determinations that this technology is safe. You will be surprised at what you will be given . Expect slickly packaged apples and oranges comparisons so read them carefully. I believe this is an egregious error being committed on the part of what could be very well meaning and well intentioned but misinformed school administrators.
Of course you can pretend that I am crazy or perhaps even convince yourself that I am. Fair enough. In 10-15 years from now you will know with absolute certainty whether the risk was real. If I was wrong, so be it. If I was not wrong, however, then it will have been too late. Just keep in mind that failing to err on the side of caution in this regard could have life changing, multi-generational consequences which you can simply choose to avoid by demanding hardwired devices as the only safe option at SCHOOL AND AT HOME. Will your children have a healthy future or have healthy children of their own? Will they be able to even have children? ONLY TIME WILL TELL. Is this technology in the proposed classroom setting applications safe? Is the convenience really worth the risk to the children’s general health and developing reproductive capabilities? http://www.safeinschool.org/2011/11/wi-fi-decreases-human-sperm-motility.html We believe that the risks are real and we are not alone. http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html It is your call and it is your choice. Make your voice heard now while it is still early in the game or forever hold your peace.
In the meantime, THE PLACATING FSD SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS AND THE INDUSTRY HAVE FORMULATED AN OPINION AND THINK THAT IT IS SAFE. If you agree with them, in spite of the mounting evidence to the contrary, then may the road rise with you and may the wind be at your back and good luck.
If you agree with me, then you need to know that the road will be rough and the wind will be in your face. In the meantime, ask the administrators and your colleagues to think again and please respectfully let them know that your children don’t eat Timothy hay!
Here is a video from http://www.wifiinschools.com/ which, in my opinion, is the finest and most comprehensive site in the entire nation in terms of irrefutable evidence that clearly demonstrates we are harming our children with this technology.
You be the judge. WiFi in schools, with their industrial strength routers in some cases just several feet from young children, that are hundreds of times more powerful than the ones in your home or cafe, wireless computers, and tablets in the hands of children emit microwave radiation in close proximity to the developing young bodies of our children, specifically the brain and the highly vulnerable reproductive areas. http://www.wifiinschools.com/studiesreports.html
Children in wireless classrooms are just like the rats in the cage in the following experiment:http://synapse.koreamed.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1020KJU/kju-48-1308.pdf
There are no FCC RF exposure guidelines for children, only for adults and that is what the schools are standing on. Also the FCC guidelines ARE DECADES OLD and only take into consideration acute burning from microwave exposure.http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/8027123_orig.jpg The FCC guidelines COMPLETELY IGNORE NON THERMAL BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS AS WELL. An important distinction to note is that guidelines are not safety standards. The FCC is not a health care agency. The FCC guidelines, in my opinion, are woefully inadequate and antiquated. They astonishingly allow for exposure limits in a classroom high enough to be 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower. Is the convenience really worth the risk? Let us begin with the basics and welcome aboard.
Look at all of the experts who agree with our position: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
Ladies and gentlemen, what your children are facing is a potential public health disaster in the making. Make your voice heard. They are your children. Please take the time to watch the rest of these videos and get informed: http://www.wifiinschools.com/educational-videos.html
Did you as a parent consent to this? Do you know if this is what your children arleady are or soon to be subjected to? Just say no!
Yes ladies and gentlemen, Agenda 21 is a Fullerton thing. Make no bones about it. You all need to be aware that the euphemism “sustainable development” has been whispered into your ear instead of the real deal which is Agenda 21.
HIGH RISE, SARDINE CAN HOUSING CLOAKED BY AN ALL SEEING WIRELESS MICROWAVE MATRIX IS THE MODEL.
STACK ‘EM HIGH, PACK ‘EM IN, FLIP THE SWITCH AND BATHE THEM IN THE EMISSIONS.
Several months ago, I mentioned to the council that building codes should be amended to include RF shielding in multifamily housing units. Ironically, Jan Flory feebly attempted to mock my Autism/wireless hypothesis and publicly conjure up the notion that my wireless concerns have no business being presented to the council, I politely reminded her that a lot more towers were coming. Well maybe they finally are. Folks you cannot afford to look the other way on this one.>
Wireless infrastructure and wireless devices are being peddled to us as a benefit. They are being jammed down our children’s throats in the classrooms as a necessity and the infrastructure is creeping ever closer to our homes and businesses disguised as palm trees or literally in plain view. By no means am I alone in believing the general health, well being, and most importantly, the fertility of us and our children is on the line.
HERE ARE ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND THIRTY SIX Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation RIGHT HERE:Parents for Safe Schools 2013 Collection of Studies, Videos and News Releases- See more at: http://thefullertoninformer.com/#sthash.Ak4DpgMZ.dpuf
What Citywide WiFi amounts to is a massive V.I.P. back door entrance to the wireless devices’ trap doors for electronic eavesdropping purposes. They also make the entire matrix including anything connected to it extremely vulnerable to cyber attacks.
Don’t kid yourselves folks, the NSA is as strong as ever and WiFi networks are about as secure as a Brazilian bank account.
Don’t fall for the latest smoke and mirrors filled theater to get your eyes off of the ball. http://benswann.com/breaking-maryland-legislators-move-to-kill-nsa-headquarters/
Yeah, and next they will tell about the layoffs that are coming at the NSA.
They don’t need the building anymore because they moved to the basement long ago.
EVERY WIRELESS, WIFI ENABLED DEVICE IS A TWO WAY TRANSMITTER. THEY ALL HAVE BUILT IN TRAP DOORS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED REMOTELY.
WHETHER IT BE A CELLPHONE, TABLET, LAPTOP, DESKTOP, TV, DVR, DECT PHONE, SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM, BABY MONITOR, SMART APPLIANCES, STOVE, OVEN, FRIDGE, XBOX, PLAYSTATION, AND WHATEVER ELSE THAT GETS ADDED TO THE LIST, THEY ALL CAN OR DO OPERATE AND BROADCAST ON A FREQUENCY OF EITHER 2.4 OR 5.0 GHz. THIS COULD BESTOW THE WIFI NETWORKS’ OPERATORS, AUTHORIZED OR NOT, CARTE BLANCE ACCESS TO EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE. WITH THE OLD WIRED CONNECTIONS, THEY WOULD NEED TO TAP INTO EACH OF THE DEVICES’ WIRES. NOW WHAT THEY HAVE EFFECTIVELY DONE IS WIRED ALL THE CONNECTIONS TO THEIR SYSTEM WITHOUT A WIRE. AND YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE DOING ALL THIS TO MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER? YEAH RIGHT.
Snowden is leaking because they want you to look at the dinosaur and the outdated building hooked up to the old copper wires. You see, while behind your backs, and under your noses, in your bedrooms, living rooms, kitchens and classrooms and even in your kids laps, they now potentially have unlimited access. Now they could theoretically just push a button and tap into all of the wireless networks and decide what channel they want to watch. Warrants? What are those? Fusion centers? Are those Japanese restaurants?
The old copper wire infrastructure used to require several city blocks of Cray computers and a 10,000 heads to log and keep tabs on us. Well, now with everything wireless, they can take the show on the road, utilize other infrastructure and some of the apparatuses can now fit into a large van on a street corner with current advances in technology.
City wide WiFi also amounts to a form of forced irradiation at both 2.4 and 5.0 GHz at power levels that are trillions of times the normal background levels in that particular part of the electromagnetic spectrum. For the record, Fukashima is elevating our background levels of ionizing radiation by less than a factor of one. WiFi by a factor of a trillion, so tell me about all this “low power” nonsense. FCC exposure guidelines green light emission levels below cooking of tissue. They deviously, totally ignore non-thermal effects.
Waves of non ionizing radiation have energy and in the presence of metals can be amplified tremendously. Stick a fork in a microwave and watch 3 million volts in action come out of a 110 volt appliance.
WiFi is low power compared to what? A microwave oven? Long term, the residents will be paying for it in more ways than they can imagine. The RF industry’s irresponsible, reckless, and unabated proliferation of these devices along with their pulse modulated microwave emissions has been given the green light by design. Slick Willy got the Agenda 21 ball rolling in 1993 when he doled out the dough for the APA to write a land use legislative blueprint for every municipality in The U.S. Then he signed the Telecom Act after a night on the town with his Glass Steagall repealing party buddies and set it all in motion. Come to think of it, this was right around the time he mandated the chiva slamming hooker vaccine(the hepatitis shot) for newborns which is given to babies within minutes of birth. The point is that there are and have been problems at the highest levels for some time now and they have us running on a treadmill chasing our tails while they cook our goose and close the walls in. Oh yeah and the lip service begins while the trojan horse rolls into town.
Regardless of whether or not you have health concerns about wireless, you are not alone and this site contains no less than 75 unique posts containing studies and links to thousands of other studies that are sure to get your attention and maybe even prove to you that beyond a shadow of a doubt, at the very least, wireless has no place in our children’s classrooms, much less on the light pole next to your child’s bedroom window. Even if you remain unconvinced of the health hazards, you still would have reason to be gravely concerned over the potential for 4th amendment violations with this technology.
I think what Snowden leaked is just the tip of the iceberg. The technology is decades ahead of what they allow us to be privy too.
If you ever had any privacy concerns, I would say the following article would be worthy of your undivided attention.
CSEC used airport Wi-Fi to track Canadian travellers: Edward Snowden documents
Electronic snooping was part of a trial run for U.S. NSA and other foreign services
About The Author
National Affairs Specialist
- Read the documents (redacted) on CSEC’s aiport Wi-FI tracking project
- Editor’s blog: Reporting on secrets and national unity
- CSEC airport Wi-Fi snooping: Reaction pours in on Twitter
- CSEC watchdog muzzled, defanged: Greg Weston
- Timeline: Edward Snowden
- Snowden document shows Canada set up spy posts for NSA
Trial run for NSA
The most recent Fullerton Observer hit the stands the other day. I have to give credit to the crew over there as The Observer is the only paper that will touch this wireless classroom issue with a ten foot pole and that is truly commendable. You know there is a lot going on in this town that would qualify under the term of “inconvenient truth”. The fact is, no one cares to deal with inconvenient truths. Sadly, when those two words end up in the same sentence, it’s lights out meatball for logic and hello Dolly for cognitive dissonance.
So how does one deal with these when confronted with something inconvenient? Well, prudent avoidance is extremely effective if no one else is looking. Denial is always an option unless the word is getting out and it is ending up in your face. Spin can be successful if your audience has a very myopic perspective and a limited memory. For the more sophisticated at heart and late in the game, you can call good old subterfuge to the rescue.
A few weeks ago, a Fullerton resident, and mother along with her 87 year old mother were passing out fliers to the parents of children as they were dropping their kids off over at Acacia Elementary.
As parents with a conscience and some critical thinking skills that have not been impaired by halide toxicity, they were legally attempting to warn parents of a potential imminent threat to the safety of school children. FSD staff, brass and board are no stranger to this information as they have been ignoring it long enough to birth a child. So these ladies, being freedom loving Americans that happen to take the “love your neighbor” scripture literally instead of allegorically, were freely and peacefully exercising their first amendment rights out on that sidewalk passing out fliers. These flyers were not printed on yellow paper being dropped out of an aircraft, rather they were clearly written warnings citing groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics, and some Harvard trained pediatric neurologist with links to thousands of scientific studies that warn against what Karen Whisnant and Robert Pletka with the tacit approval of the silent school board is doing to the Acacia kids with their wireless radiation experiment in the classrooms. http://thefullertoninformer.com/is-this-your-child/, You get the picture.
So at the drive thru, the kids can hold the pickles and hold the lettuce but in the classrooms special orders do upset us. No wireless, no education at Acacia. That was the final from Brother Bob some time ago. So rather than crawl under a rock inside a Faraday cage with my kids, I had some of my colleagues filming these wonderful ladies do what they felt inclined to do, that is warn the parents that sending their children into that environment maybe isn’t such a good idea. I will tell you what is not a good idea, and that is stepping on the egos of those who have dug their heels in on this issue all the way to China because Karen Whisnant who personally refused this information at least twice called the police on this law abiding, valiant 87 year old grandmother who puts all of these servile, spineless lackeys to shame.
So now enter Jim James from Fullerton who wrote into the Observer in response to my letter to all involved in this potentially unmitigated public health disaster in the making. You can read what I believe to be his subterfuge piece missing the boat right here on page 2 :http://www.fullertonobserver.com/
Yeah he says it costs a quarter for gas to have two Crown Victoria police interceptors show up to shake down an 87 year old grandmother passing out fliers. With super at 4 bucks a gallon, the lead foots down Commonwealth to Acacia and North to Dorothy, he is probably off by a few bucks. Sure the salaries are paid regardless of whether they are shaking down an 87 year old grandmother, murdering a homeless man or simply arresting a drunk driver. My point was the school called the police on a law abiding citizen exercising her first amendment rights on a public sidewalk. It was done simply to intimidate and to embarrass people that were not in agreement with her forced irradiation classroom model. Jim James you spin it well. You introduce terms like missing persons, 25 cents, sick and tired, community and donut shop.
Jim James, what is your dog in this fight? Is it the health of these school children? Is it your ardent support of free speech? Is it your concern over the fatally flawed business model of the FSD with their purchasing of all these contraptions that if you add the letters c and e after the letter a to that word, you just might get a glimpse of the permanent version of what the social engineers have in store for the unsuspecting? Do tell. What prompted to you to write this letter?
Subterfuge defined. Plain and simple.
Kids’ health is on the line, you talk about 25 cents worth of gas.
Police from one of the most notorious departments in America are called on an 87 year old grandmother and you talk about being sick and tired.
The First Amendment was being attacked and you talk about a donut shop.
The school district officials ignore this information for almost a year and you talk about someone doing their JOB.
No, not one mention of the kids, the thousands of scientific studies that warn against the wireless classroom experiment, the fact that someone could have gone to jail or even beaten to death for doing nothing, and no mention of one government entity (the school district) throwing its weight around to intimidate the law abiding taxpayers.
No, once again, not one mention of the possible health dangers to our children as a result of this potentially unmitigated public health disaster in the making, just a reference to chump change.
When you are dealing with lackeys in lockstep formation from the fields of education and academia along with those in industries like telecom and defense, and the servile, sold out in the cubicles, what else would you expect? Face this issue head on? It is a nightmare. Try being one of those 14,o00 children in the FSD as the backs of the grown ups are turning on them. Yes, they are going to have microwave transmitters in their laps for the rest of their lives.
With the vampires running the blood bank at The FCC, with the FSD and the FJUHSD boards appearing to be asleep at the switch and with Pletka’s and Giokaris’s feet on the gas, one has to wonder in light of all the science on both sides of this issue, what is this all going to do to the children? Chronic, long term pulse modulated wireless microwave radiation exposure trillions of times the normal background levels in direct proximity to the sensitive developing reproductive areas of children has never been studied. What has been known for decades is that microwaves are dangerous even at what is commonly referred to as ”low power”. 7 years ago the German’s warned us:
40 years ago the Navy told us:
A year ago the experts warned us:
HERE ARE ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX Reference Links to Peer-Reviewed Studies re RF Microwave Radiation
Just like Roman Schulze’s wife Michele Garden was “sick and tired” of the flyers on the windshields over at Acacia ending up in the gutter because she made herself the self appointed street sweeper, another one decides to jump in the” irradiate the children and attack the first amendment” basket. Jim James is sick and tired alright. Jan Weiner chimed in from over at CSUF a few weeks ago on the wireless issue on the heels of Dr. Roman Schulze’s presentation to the Glendale Unified’s board convincing them to green light the WiFi party in our northern Agenda 21 neighbors’ classrooms. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any stranger-
We too will continue to speak up for these kids while Jimmy Boy, you can keep the chump change. The largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever known is well underway. It needs to come to an end. To all of you who know better, please don’t turn your backs on those who already have the deck stacked to the hilt against them. Silence in this case, I believe, is complicity of the worst kind.
Jim, we will never get sick and tired of people like you getting sick and tired because when people like the aforementioned get sick and tired, that just means that we are becoming more effective. We cannot ever afford to get sick and tired of having the backs of these kids. Not getting sick and tired is gonna make all the difference in the world to them someday whether you are sick and tired or not.
California State of Education Event Attendees Get Surprise Message from Fullerton Group
9-11: Was it a secret encounter of large powerful entities involving the highest echelons of economic, military and government power as they converged to the shrink the collective mind of America and to pillage the entire planet?
As Americans, we have not only the right, but also the duty to question government. We must keep it on a short leash and not the other way around. Thousands tragically lost their lives that morning. Hundreds of thousands if not millions more lost theirs in the questionable wars following the disaster. Billions more hang in the teetering balance of power today.
Because you have a right to know, we at The Fullerton Informer dare to push the envelope. On 9-11-13, in the midst of our quest to end the largest radiation experiment on young school children that the world has ever seen, we revisit this issue. The result of this mass deception that weighs in equally as heavily whose ramifications that, to this day, continue to wreak havoc around the globe, is the creation of the pretext to attack any nation, anywhere for just about any reason. Now in America anyone can be arrested for anything at anytime and be held indefinitely with cause or a trial. Privacy is merely a myth and 1984 arrived in the twinkling of an eye for those of you that were not paying attention. The justification for all of this has been established in the minds of the deluded people by the controlled media at the hands of those who aimlessly wander the halls of power.
On this Patriot Day, flanked by the Patriot Act, under the ominous umbrella of the NDAA we now live in a total surveillance society tracked, traced and controlled by computers and cameras. 24/7 operation mockingbird fear mongering is the instrument of psychological control on the 3000 channel idiot box and cattle stall talk radio circuits. Insidious meta data gathering, biometrics, eavesdropping, wiretapping, and flickering blue glow melatonin disrupting TV screens everywhere jamming constant fright, propaganda and lies down our throats now accompany us 12 years later with the ridiculous official story still being propped up by the crumbling institutions who no longer have or deserve our trust. Do we as a people have the courage to face the compelling evidence as well as the width and depth of the reality that our once trusted institutions are actively betraying the American people and the world? If they will lie about something as in your face as this, there are no limits to depths of the pit that they are digging for humanity. The sooner we face the facts, the better the chances that our children may actually have some semblance of what we once took for granted but have since abdicated with our eyes wide shut and our inexcusable apathy.
WATCH FOR YOURSELVES LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. I DARE YOU.
Not too long ago, I put forth the following article on this very topic on this very blog: http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/
SO IS THIS WHERE THE RUBBER NOW MEETS THE ROAD?
Maybe so for now but this wheel turns awful fast. In the meantime, let’s hope all of their carbonyl iron levels are where they need to be as they all fly in circles on their flat earth.
I GUESS WE GOT THEIR ATTENTION FOR ALL IT IS WORTH.
THE MOST DANGEROUS PLACE IN AMERICA TODAY IS STILL INSIDE OF A MOTHER’S WOMB. YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD KNOW BETTER OR AT LEAST WANT TO HELP.
Keep Our Children’s School Technology Safe, It’s Time To Apply the Precautionary Principle-by a loving, concerned Fullerton mother.
There are two sides of the argument of whether or not WiFi belongs in our children’s classrooms. Let’s remember that it is not a question of whether or not technology will be part of the student’s education, but whether it is wired or wireless (WiFi). Wired technology is a more secure and reliable connection with virtually no safety issues. WiFi communication is achieved with microwave electromagnetic frequency emissions that result in our children being exposed to wireless radiation in the classroom.
Those who are pushing for wireless technology stand with studies funded by the tech industry, and tech industry’s literature that attest to its safety. This side says there are no long-term studies that say wireless radiation is harmful. They also point to FCC guidelines as the reason to claim that it is safe.
Let’s look at the FCC guidelines. These criteria were last updated 17 years ago, in 1996. If we think back to that time, technology was very different from today. The use and amount of devices has grown and proliferated. Equally significant, the guidelines ignore non-thermal biological effects, which is the safety concern with wireless radiation. Given this, it could easily be said that the FCC guidelines are antiquated and, consequently, potentially dangerous.
Those who do not want wireless radiation in their children’s classroom can point to:
More than 5000 studies: http://www.justproveit.net/studies
Letters from MDs, researchers and scientists imploring the Los Angeles Unified School District school board to opt for wired technologies:
Numerous websites (I’m still coming upon more):
WiFi In Schools US
WiFi In Schools UK
WiFi In Schools Austrailia
Citizens 4 Safe Technology
Center For Safer Wireless
Countless videos (this is not all):
Dr. Magda Havas: WiFi In Schools is Safe. True or False?
WiFi In Schools: Testing for Microwave Radiation Dangers In the Classroom: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FO0AnNHz8vI
There is not much we can do about antiquated FCC guidelines, and there is not much we can do about the lack of funding, which has prevented the needed long-term studies. We can recognize there are two sides to the issue, and that we must, above all else, provide for the safety of our children. The safety of our school technology must come first, over its method of delivery: wired or wireless.
Recognizing the disparity of these two viewpoints, it is imperative that we act in the best interests of the children. To do so, we acknowledge the two sides and use the precautionary principle. As Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director, Center for Family and Community Health, University of California, Berkeley, in a letter dated February 8, 2013, to Los Angeles USD:
“The precautionary principle should be applied to this critical policy decision. This principle, developed at a U.N. environmental conference in 1992 states that in the absence of scientific consensus if an action has a suspected risk of causing harm, the burden of proof it is not harmful falls on those taking the action, and all reasonable measures to reduce the risk must be taken.”
There is an “absence of scientific consensus”; there is “a suspected risk of causing harm”; the “burden of proof” rests with the side pushing wireless radiation into the classroom. That side has not met the burden of proof that it cannot harm our children. The “reasonable” measure is right in front of us and it will not harm our children, it is wired technology.
Let’s not risk the health of our children, let’s do the right and precautionary thing and keep safety first with our school technology. Let’s apply the precautionary principle and use only wired technology in our schools. The F.S.D. has a world class opportunity to do what we believe is the right thing.
I sent an email over the firm that the district hired to do the RF survey over at Acacia Elementary. I can’t make heads or tails out of those numbers because even the cheapest RF meter that I own, detects WiFi outside the building , which they couldn’t manage to detect the first time the gang showed up at Acacia with their RENTED equipment (huge red flag).
I showed up at open house with my low end equipment, and mind you there were NOT 35 Ipads running like they supposedly had on when they did their survey, and I detected levels astronomically higher coming off of just the router in a kindergarten class with no IPads running compared to what they reported on their second visit with an even more sophisticated, $50,000 piece of RENTED equipment (huge red flag), that in reality takes a trained expert with tremendous experience to operate and to accurately measure RF levels. O.K, lets cut to the chase gang:
From: joe imbriano <email@example.com>
Subject: Fwd: FSD RF report
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
From: joe imbriano <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:48 PM
Subject: FSD RF report
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
I would like to know as a parent of 4 students in the FSD, how many RF emission surveys has your firm conducted over the last 20 years? As a parent of children in the FSD, I am deeply concerned with the results that you have put forth.
From: joe imbriano <email@example.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM
Subject: FSD RF report
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
I would like to know as a parent of 4 students in the FSD, how many RF emission surveys has your firm conducted over the last 20 years? As a parent of children in the FSD, I am deeply concerned with the results that you have put forth.
On July 9, 2013, thefullertoninformer.com reached a milestone after just 4 short months up and running. We logged over 20,000 hits in a single 24 hour period with visitors from all over the world. Why are so many people looking at this site if we are all a bunch of nut jobs? Well if we are, then at least we are not alone and most certainly in good company. We are not some hack operation that plays an active role in perpetuating this massive ongoing public health crisis. Sorry gang, we are not into holding the truth in unrighteousness and suppressing the evidence for and the causes of infertility and childhood diseases induced by barbaric hospital and medical procedures, petrochemical pharmaceutical poisons and EMF microwave radiation exposures that we clearly believe are preventable.
There is no DONATE button on this site and there never will be. Our advice may seem cheap to some but it will always be free to all. What you read here you won’t find anywhere else and believe me folks, we are just gettin’ started. Everyone’s 2 cents is welcome here so join the discussion.
The best things in life are still free my friends. Won’t you join us and help us continue to get the word out? Thanks a million.
THIS ONE’S FOR ALL OF THE PARENTS, THE ACACIA PTA,THE ACACIA PARTNERSHIP, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, AND OF COURSE WE CAN’T FORGET DR. PLETKA.
You all have 29 minutes to spare for the kids? It is high time to get ya’ll off of the milk and onto some solid food.
For several months now I have been patiently waiting for permission to film and record the microwave radiation level readings in the wireless classrooms at my children’s school Acacia Elementary, which was voted the number one elementary school in The O.C. by the O.C. Ragister (yes the Ragister). Well they won’t let me in to do my own readings just yet. I was told that it would be disruptive to the learning process. You know, I believe that they really weren’t kidding when the experts over at Executive Environmental got the cushy gig from the District to go in and tell us what we have all been waiting to hear. Could it have been a hack job designed to turn out what the FSD wanted to hear?
I believe that they were undergoing on the job training on the taxpayer dime when they found EMF readings that could only be found on the inside of a Faraday cage or down and out in the Okefenokee swamp. Hey gang, get a load of this April fools joke on the Fourth of July. The FSD is way more than a day late and a dollar short on this one. I don’t know about you all but I want my money back.
ACACIA’S READINGS ACTUALLY WERE REPORTED BY EXECUTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL TO BE EVEN LOWER THAN 0.01. PEAK AVERAGES WERE REPORTED TO BE IN THE RANGE OF 0.001 MICRO WATT PER SQUARE CENTIMETER AND AVERAGES WERE REPORTED TO BE IN THE 0.0000001-0.000007 RANGE-THERE IS NO WAY THEY WOULD EVEN SHOW UP ON THIS GRAPH AT THOSE LEVELS.
For Immediate Release July 1, 2013 FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT RELEASES REPORT ON RESPONSIBLE USE OF WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Robert Pletka, Ed.D. Superintendent, Fullerton School District (Fullerton, CA)
CLICK HERE FOR THE FSD PRESS RELEASE
PLEASE READ THE LAST PARAGRAPHS ON BOTH OF THESE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. THESE GUYS DIDN’T GET THERE WITH DEGREES IN GRANT WRITING OR PSYCHOLOGY. THEY ARE SCIENTISTS. LOOKS LIKE THE JOKE’S ON YOUR KIDS FOLKS.
To those of you who know me quite well, June 27th is a very special date. This year has proven to be no exception. Today under a clear blue sky, with the jasmine in bloom and the firework stands going up, The Fullerton Informer showed up unannounced to the ASCIP’s executive committee meeting in Cerritos, which by the way, is a public meeting complete with an agenda, public comment and advanced notice. I just figured golly, what better group to present the potential dangers that wireless classrooms pose to our school children than to the risk managers themselves. Heck no one in the Fullerton School District has given me the time of day so I even felt compelled to share my hypothesis on the EMF connection to Autism as a warning to the pregnant teachers to help keep the Xmods down for the districts and the teachers’ kids from ending up in special ed. I also felt compelled to explain that the FCC guidelines are not safety standards, allow for up to 1000 times the emissions of a cell tower in a classroom, ignore non thermal effects, are like the USDA school lunch hacks calling pizza a vegetable , and a 2000 mph speed limit in a school zone.
As is customary in all the public meetings we attend, we bring a camera and some handouts. It turns out that Mr. General counsel himself wasn’t havin’ it. You guessed it, Mr. Feldhake of The Feldhake Law Firm told us we couldn’t film a public meeting that is governed by the Brown Act. We asked him several times and he refused citing that he believed that it would be disruptive. I chose to take the high road instead of waiting for the sheriff to arrive and embarrass him. We will take the recording as soon as it is available. Jeepers, don’t they remember anything from law school? Oh yeah, the Brown Act-that inconvenient truth that haunts all bureaucrats at the trough.
This is slightly reminiscent of The Fullerton School District Superintendent, Dr. Pletka and his disturbing letter telling me to basically pound sand when I asked to go into my children’s classrooms at a taxpayer funded public school to film and record EMF measurements in a room full of 35 Ipads humming away cranking out EMF in the kids’ laps streaming back and forth with those industrial strength WiFi routers that are situated right above some lucky students’ heads all day. I digress.
A little excerpt from the Brown Act:
A legislative body may discuss or act on some matters without considering written materials. But if writings
are distributed to a majority of a legislative body in connection with an agenda item, they must also be
available to the public. A writing distributed to a majority of the legislative body less than 72 hours before
the meeting must be made available for inspection at the time of distribution at a public office or location
designated forthat purpose; and the agendas for all meetings of the legislative body must include the
address of this office or location.28 A writing distributed during a meeting must be made public:
• At the meeting if prepared by the local agency or a member of its legislative body; or
• Afterthe meeting if prepared by some other person.29
Any tape or film record of an open and public meeting made for whatever purpose by or at the direction
of the local agency is subject to the Public RecordsAct; however, it may be erased or destroyed 30 days
after the taping or recording. Any inspection of a video or tape recording is to be provided without charge
on a video or tape player made available by the local agency.30 The agency may impose its ordinary
charge for copies.31
In addition, the public is specifically allowed to use audio or video tape recorders or still or motion picture
cameras at a meeting to record the proceedings, absent a reasonable finding by the legislative body that
noise, illumination, or obstruction of view caused by recorders or cameras would persistently disrupt the
Similarly, a legislative body cannot prohibit or restrict the public broadcast of its open and public meetings
without making a reasonable finding that the noise, illumination, or obstruction of view would persistently
disrupt the proceedings.33
Today’s meeting fits all of the aforementioned like a glove. The only thing that was in the hall where we wanted to film was the carpet. We will see what the Los Angeles County District Attorney has to say. Folks, there are millions of kids who will be potentially affected by being locked inside these microwave chambers for over a decade of their young lives with no long term studies on what this stuff does to them. This is being done so that the kids can play with these microwave transmitters instead of those evil textbooks or perhaps for other reasons.
Who knows, maybe what we presented today will have sunk in by late August and we can all go back to our daily lives instead of trying to stop what I believe to be the largest radiation experiment on school children that the world has ever seen. Time will tell. If it didn’t sink in, we will be back and they will just have to hear it again. We will keep you posted.
|from:||joe imbriano <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|to:|| bob_pletka <email@example.com>,
Karen Whisnant <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Robert EM Craven <email@example.com>,
“Rep. Ed Royce” <CA39ERima@mail.house.gov>
|date:||Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:14 AM|
|subject:||CLASSROOM RADIATION LEVELS IN THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT|
|from:||joe imbriano <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
“Rep. Ed Royce” <CA39ERima@mail.house.gov>
|date:||Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:58 AM|
|subject:||CLASSROOM RADIATION LEVELS|
June 11, 2013-The Fullerton Informer welcomes even more Fullerton parents to the other side of the story.
Posted by a local parent who cares deeply about all students.
WiFi In Schools
I am a mom of three in Fullerton. Fullerton School District (FSD) is planning on having WiFi-enabled devices in every child’s hands. WiFi in classrooms is a new and unique environment; for our children it means 6 – 7 hrs a day, continuous exposure to electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation, put out by powerful routers, for whole school years. This has never been done before.
Enough research has been done. Neuroscientists, medical doctors and researchers all know the harmful effects of WiFi in the schools:
Martha Herbert, Ph.D., M.D., Assistant Professor, Pediatric Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital
“RF has been shown to cause other potentially harmful biological effects, such as leakage of the blood brain barrier that can lead to damage of neurons in the brain, increased micronuclei (DNA fragments) in human blood lymphocytes—all at RF exposures that are well below the limits in the current FCC guidelines.”
“In addition, studies of living cells show that the cells start to manufacture stress proteins upon exposure to RF. The stress response occurs with a number of potentially harmful environmental factors, such as elevated temperature, changes in pH, toxic metals, etc. This means that when stress protein synthesis is stimulated by radiofrequency EMF, the body is essentially telling us that RF exposure is harmful.”
Martin Blank, Ph.D., Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics
As a mom, we naturally want our children to grow up to be healthy and productive adults. After reading what these researchers, MDs, and scientists are saying, I hope you come to the same conclusion that I do: the technology the Fullerton School District uses must be safe for our children.
All of these experts are saying the same thing: WiFi in schools is not safe. DO NOT USE WiFi IN SCHOOLS. They are telling the public schools to use hard-wired technology, which is a safer and more reliable connection. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) laws have not caught up and do not address the WiFi environment that FSD plans on putting in place.
Parties that stand to benefit or have a vested interest in the expansion of the technology market, most notably, the tech industry, fund the studies from other side that is saying that WiFi is safe. Much of the tech industry research is based on thermal testing, and this leads them to say that wifi in the schools is OK. The real issue is EMF radiation, not thermal damage. The EMF research cannot be refuted by the tech industry, and as time goes on the body of research accumulates. It is growing.
The Fullerton School District is not telling you this information. Despite numerous attempts to get the FSD school board, principals, and teachers to acknowledge this growing body of research and evidence, it is completely ignored. This information has been presented at the Fullerton School Board meeting on three separate occasions. Fullerton School District is silent.
These are our children, please read the new information that is now available to us. Let’s ask the question to FSD, “Why are you implementing wifi technology in our children’s school when so many scientists and researchers are saying it is harmful?” These are our children, let’s get involved.
My hat goes off to the first one who can make heads or tails or glean one iota of meaning from the following propaganda piece: http://thefullertoninformer.com/?attachment_id=1262
This propaganda piece was published right on the heels of our efforts to awaken the sleeping giant- the parents of children in the Fullerton School District, to the dangers of wireless classrooms. I just don’t get it and by the wording on that yellow piece of paper that came home with my children, it appears that neither do they.
Who is really controlling this thing?
So far, the media here in The O.C. and, specifically here in my hometown of Fullerton, which is rife with a diverse collection of media outlets, won’t touch this Fullerton School District classroom WiFi radiation business story with a ten foot pole. But up in Glendale, it appears that letters to the editor do get published.
Our good friend Tony up there managed to get under someone’s skin and get them to let the cat out of the bag. Could it be that the good folks in Glendale’s local media still believe in a free press? So far, I haven’t sensed the slightest inclination that we do down here in my hometown, where even the air is better, or is it? Tony you are a good man.
Folks, Fullerton needs some more Tony’s. Come on guys, stand up for your children. You stand up, cheer, scream and yell, and keep tabs on the scores and stats for all the ball games for a bunch of people who make ten thousand times more money than you do, and who by the way, could care less about your children. Hows about 3 cheers for Fullerton’s school children and a safe learning environment? With wireless classrooms, it sure looks like we don’t have one and believe me, I am not alone: http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
My sincere hope is that the men and women in this town will put down the remote and tune into this reality check channel instead. We all need to focus on this issue while you have your precious children home for the summer. Put them first in a big way by educating yourselves on this issue because it is here to stay ladies and gentlemen. Someday you will appreciate the fact that so are we. For more information on the dangers of wireless classrooms please explore the rest of this blog and also please visit another one of our good friends who cares deeply about all of our children as well:
Does the State of California Department of Education care more about wireless technology than the children?
This was sent to me by a mom in Fullerton who truly cares.
I just read the California Department of Education, News Release: #13-62, dated June 6, 2013. Here it is: http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/ne/yr13/yr13rel62.asp
The first sentence reads: “State Superintendent Tom Torlakson today hailed President Obama’s call to give more schools broadband internet access and wireless network capacity.” This, after all the letters written to LA Unified School District by MDs, PhDs, and scientists imploring LAUSD to use wired technologies. And, this is after all the pushback from the LA teacher’s union on using the wireless technology and pushback from parents across the state.
There is just so much information out there that says the EMF (electro magnetic frequency) radiation is harmful to our children. It is available to us all. http://www.wifiinschools.com/lausd-testimony.html
As a mother of three, it is shocking that Torlakson can just turn a deaf ear to this information that is so important. How does that happen?
As a mom, when you drop your child off for school in the morning, you don’t want one hair on their head harmed by being in the school environment. I certainly don’t want my children experiencing “double strand DNA breaks” or “decreased sperm motility” or headaches, leukemia, etc. What happens when a school decides for us, and makes the choice for our children, to be exposed to WiFi radiation? Does the State of California have that right?
It seems as if the state believes that the Internet can only be accessed via an unsafe, wireless means. We all know that is not true. Yet, they are insisting on this. Why?
Apparently, it makes no difference to Superintendent Torlakson, he won’t settle for safe and secure wired technologies. No, he prefers to risk the health of millions of California children for the sake of what? So that our children can run around with an iPad in their hands?
Why doesn’t the harmful radiation make any difference to Tom Torlakson? Why isn’t he as concerned about the safety of our children as we parents? Mr. Torlakson, don’t you care about the health and welfare of our children? Why can’t you take a precautionary stance on this issue and opt for wired technologies? Well as a matter of fact from his own re-election web page,http://www.tomtorlakson.com/story we quote: ” As the chair and founder of the California Task Force on Youth and Workplace Wellness, Tom has been a leader on banning junk food from our schools, providing healthier school meals, and promoting student health and fitness”.
I don’t get it. Does damaging WiFi promote health and fitness?
As a mom, all I can say is that Torlakson needs to undergo the same experiment as the Fullerton School District Superintendent, Dr. Pletka.
So, Tom Torlakson, here you go: before our children are subjected to this UNPRECEDENTED WiFi EMF radiation experiment, you must be the FIRST to step up to the plate. We, the parents, insist that you sit in a room with a WiFi router, 35 operating iPads at legal emission levels, 6 hrs/day for 180 days/year for 12 years.
At the end of that time, you tell us how that worked out for you.
Since you think it is OK to experiment on our kids, we must insist that you be experimented on FIRST.
One final thing, Mr. Torlakson, mom’s don’t take kindly to their children’s health being compromised. We take a lot of care in raising our children. We make sure they eat right, get to the doctor and dentist office when needed, and worry a whole bunch that they are growing up healthy and happy. Raising children is truly a labor of love and one filled with blood, sweat, and tears, and a lot of sleepless nights.
After all of this, do you think you have the right to put our children in an unsafe environment just because you say so?
You don’t, Mr. Torlakson.
Fullerton mother of three-
Here is a letter from the F.S.D. to the Fullerton Informer site administrator:
The F.S.D. claims that the classroom microwave EMF emissions are legal. They also refuse to grant us access to film and record our own measurements. We at The Fullerton Informer believe that the microwave EMF emissions present in the classrooms, that the district claims are well below the FCC limits, are not safe. We, by the way, are not alone with respect to our position:
The current FCC standards that the FSD is hiding behind are based on thermal (heating) effects of these microwave EMF emissions. The widely held view in the scientific community is with the dangers of the NON-THERMAL interactions and effects on children at the cellular and molecular level that have been clearly demonstrated in the medical literature to be real. Therefore, we believe that the FCC guidelines are woefully inadequate, antiquated and allow students to be subjected to, what we believe to be, dangerous levels of microwave EMF radiation in the classrooms as a result of the use of these WiFi enabled devices and the networks’ industrial strength routers that can potentially result in long term health effects. We believe that chronic exposure to these emissions is potentially very dangerous. Our position is to hard wire the technology in the classrooms as well as in your homes. By forcing the use of WiFi enabled tablets in the classroom, the Fullerton School District is then forcing the students and their families to operate and maintain a wireless environment in their homes so the students can do their homework on the wireless devices. Now even many of the after school day care facilities that serve the Fullerton students are considering installing wireless networks so that the students can do their homework on their tablets while in their custody before and after school. I believe that the willful ignorance of this information by the F.S.D, its Board of Trustees and its employees is not in the best interests of the students or even the community at large. The ramifications of their decisions have far reaching unintended consequences that we can no longer ignore.
This bears repeating, the wireless setting that the F.S.D. is forcing the existence of in the home, in the classrooms, and indirectly in day care facilities, is in our opinion, not safe for children, and especially for pregnant women or anyone else for that matter. The whole basis for this technology being safe is based on current FCC standards that completely IGNORE an entire realm of non-thermal physiological effects and the associated non-thermal mechanisms by which they take place. That is what we call uncharted territory folks. Most Fullerton students are there now and even more will be next year.
So all of the aforementioned begs the question.
We at the Fullerton Informer have been trying to get the Board’s and the administration’s attention on these potential dangers facing our children for months.
Why does it appear that the F.S.D just doesn’t get it?
SEEDS NOT EXPOSED TO WIFI
SEEDS EXPOSED TO WIFI
Sure WiFi is safe for growing children, just not for growing seeds.
I believe that a public health crisis is in the process of unfolding right before our very own eyes with 1 in 5 children now being diagnosed with a mental illness: CDC-1 in 5 children suffer from a mental disorder.
We all want what is best for our children. As parents, we all want the best tools for learning, the best schools, the best teachers, and the best curriculum so that our children have a chance at a bright future in an extremely competitive world. There is no doubt about the need for technology. It is here to stay. It is because of it that you are reading this. But why does it all have to be wireless? What about the health and safety concerns as they relate to our children? Could these emissions be harming our children? What is wrong with wires connected to computers? That is our contention: hard wire the devices in light of the recent L.A.U.S.D EXPERT TESTIMONY and the recent letter sent to the Fullerton School District Board of Trustees on 5-13-13 that all strongly suggest that WiFi is not safe for children in a room full of wireless transmitters (tablets).
We at the FullertonInformer.com submit to you that we must delay the roll out of these wireless classrooms as the health concerns continue to mount. There needs to be designated classrooms at each grade level that have the technology hard wired for parents that choose NOT to subject their children to these emissions coming from the routers and the devices. The convenience is simply not worth the risk to our children. Are you willing to take that chance? I believe we simply cannot afford to especially when it is totally unnecessary. We have fiber optic connectivity right to the classroom walls. Why does it have to stop there?
Our good friends over at http://www.wifiinschools.com/ shared the following link to a story of a remarkable group of 9th graders in Denmark, with no formal medical training, who with about 5 bucks produced a priceless experiment:
Parents, look for yourselves and get a load of what two WiFi routers do to a bunch of poor little innocent seeds that were simply sitting too close to a pair of friendly WiFi routers. Poor things-they were just trying to grow up and make it in life. What is all of this 21st Century learning nonsense gonna do to all of yours? So which children will be getting the best seat in the house closest to the Cisco Aironet enterprise class WiFi routers in Fullerton’s new wireless classrooms that stay on all day long and have perfect attendance 180 days a year? Hey gang, I am just the messenger and yes this experiment was peer reviewed- by the whole 9th grade class.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE: http://www.wifiinschools.com/ IS A TREMENDOUS RESOURCE FOR PARENTS, EDUCATORS AND STUDENTS WHO HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SAFETY OF THE NEW PROPOSED CLASSROOM APPLICATIONS OF THIS TECHNOLOGY. IT HAS A WIDE ARRAY OF INFORMATIVE VIDEOS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE DANGERS OF WIFI IN SCHOOLS.
THIS CAME IN THIS MORNING FROM SOMEONE WHO WISHES TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AND WHO HAS ASKED ME TO FORWARD THIS INFORMATION. SHE HAS FOLLOWED WHAT IS PRESENTED ON THIS BLOG AND DISTILLED THIS DOWN FOR YOU–
I Believe There Is A Link Between EMF Exposure and Autism.
The autism rate continues to grow. As of yet, the cause of this brain disorder REMAINS unknown.
I believe that EMF (Electro Magnetic Frequency) emissions from devices such as wireless computers, cell phones, tablets, cordless phones, wifi routers, wireless gaming controllers are damaging to the brain of developing fetus.
We have all seen what happens when a piece of metal foil or fork is accidentally left in the microwave. The microwaves hitting the metal creates an electrical discharge on the item.
Our bodies contain metals and when the EMF hits our bodies, it impacts our bodies, and if we are pregnant the fetus is also impacted. We believe that Carbonyl Iron, if taken as a prenatal vitamin, may provide a buffer to EMF exposure and can possibly prevent the incidence of autism.
There are two things that I believe that you can do to assist in the delivery of a healthy child:
1) Take prenatal vitamins containing Carbonyl Iron while pregnant or
2) Do your best to eliminate exposure to EMF emissions if not possible, be aware of possible EMF exposure in your surroundings and try to limit it. Hard wire your electronic devices.
The unexplained climbing rate of autism along with the expansion of EMF emissions and WiFi in our surroundings is very alarming. We believe the cause of autism to triggered by EMF exposure and are passing this information on.
To join the conversation or obtain a more detailed explanation, please visit: http://thefullertoninformer.com/carbonyl-iron-and-orange-county-the-autism-capital-of-the-state/
Here is a letter to The F.S.D. from a group of physicians: mail-attachment… (2)
You know just because the classroom microwave emissions are legal doesn’t mean that they are safe for our children.
The Fullerton School District Board of Trustees needs to stop hiding behind the outdated FCC guidelines that were based on thermal exposures established decades ago on marine infantry soldier type mannequins when non thermal dangers are an entirely different threat that we worry is potentially facing the children.
This panda is absorbing at the 2.45 GHz frequency .
Acacia School’s BYOD Informational Meeting
Hot off the press…
For all 2013 -2014 5th & 6th grade families
Acacia Bring Your Own iPad Program
is expanding for the next school year!!
Please attend an important Informational Night to learn more about your
child’s participation in next school year’s BYOD program.
Monday, May 13th
Acacia School Multipurpose Room
*Please note that all parents need to attend a BYOD Info night prior to their
child participating in the program.*
Folks it has been two months since we began this mission to inform and educate staff and parents. I have attended and spoken at school board meetings, handed out flyers, and sent mass emails to district staff, and set up this blog that links to many of the dangers of wireless classrooms. We provided information that is well documented. What do we get for our anniversary?
AN INVITATION FOR MORE RADIATION.
So what gives with the cold shoulder for the last 2 months? Why does it appear that the entire administration is ignoring me, this blog and this information. Why does the administration not answer my requests to film and take EMF measurements in the classrooms?
• Be informed about the above rights to participate in the education of their children.
I submit to you. ladies and gentlemen, that the children’s safety comes first.
This came in to me last night from a concerned mother who has been watching on the sidelines and who has read up on this issue. I felt compelled to share this, as the sentiment contained here is shared by many who are now gaining the courage to speak on this issue.
We all care about our fellow human, that is certain. There are
so many good folks out there working tirelessly to do good
for the community. We are busy raising money through galas,
fund raisers, and reaching out for corporate sponsorships.
Everyone is saying “yes” we want to participate and help.
Our purpose is good . . . . . or IS it?
The FSD has in their plans an enormous expansion of WiFi-
enabled devices, one for each child’s hands. FSD believes
they are doing the best for the children, and the school and
community have gotten together to make this happen. Their
intentions are good.
But, what if FSD would actually look at the research and
studies that continue to grow. Even easier, just read the
letters from the following individuals and institutions
Dr. Martha Herbert, Ph. D, M.D., Assistant Professor,
Pediatric Neurology, Harvard Medical School,
Massachusetts General Hospital.
American Academy of Environmental Medicine
Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons,
Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics
Dr. Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D., Environmental & Resource
Studies, Trent University, ON, Canada
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neuroscience,
Joel Moscowitz, Ph. D, Director of Center for Family and
Community Health, University of California, Berkeley
Devra Davis, Ph.D. MPH, Environmental Health Trust
Antoinette Stein, Ph.D., Environmental Health Trust
Mary Beth Brangan, Co-director, Ecological Options
Please keep in mind that this is only a partial list.
Each of these researchers and institutions is saying the
same thing: opt for wired technologies. The ones who
have studied the effects of wifi are in a position to make this
statement. The effects of WiFi in schools IS HARMFUL.
It is truly amazing what we can do when we set our minds
to it. But, what if we find out in the process that, while our
intentions were good, the fruits of our labor are harmful to the
children? This is the case, FSD.
This is the information we are trying to get FSD to sit down
and look at. It is not complicated stuff. The research does,
however, make very clear that the FSD wifi technology plans
are harmful to our kids.
You have been silent too long, FSD. It is time to do the
responsible thing and look at this information. Make evident
that your concern and care for our children outweighs a
commitment to the wrong road.
DON’T TRY THIS AT HOME.
I believe this is one of the most insightful 8 1/2 minute glimpses into the future of education in the FSD, the FJUSD, the State, or the entire United States for that matter. Top down command and control right here, right now, right at your fingertips.
In the clip, we have the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and our very own Robert Craven http://cue.org/robertemcraven . He is the Fullerton School District’s technology director, (who, by the way, still refuses to answer my emails requesting permission to film and record classroom EMF radiation levels at both of my children’s schools). They can be seen smiling and holding fast to the ambiguous promises of 21st Century learning. Not for one second in this video, is there any mention of the potential health risks posed to our children by the implementation of this new, common core microwave matrix being foisted onto the children of the unsuspecting masses.
Oh fiddlesticks, Joe. This is progress. You don’t say. Ladies and gentleman, we are talking about 17 years, 180 days a year, 6 hours a day, of K-12 instruction PLUS high school, inside a Faraday cage. Just kidding. Well, actually I wish, well not really. Folks, we are talking absolutely unprecedented EMF radiation exposures, the likes of which no generation has ever endured and your kids are about to. Hear me out on this. Don’t be afraid to face the reality of what they have planned for your children. Who cares what your friends think. What is more important, your fair weather friends or your own flesh and blood, your children? Show me the studies where it shows that the proposed classroom setting exposures at these frequencies, intensities, durations, proximity to the emission sources, compounded by headsets, gain from orthodontic arrays, filing cabinets, and other metallic objects on or in proximity to the 35 kids packed into electronic sardine cans for 15 years is safe? THERE AIN’T NONE GANG. Are you still with me?
A 1:1 pupil to device ratio is the stated goal. No child left off line is the new mantra. It will be accomplished by sentencing every child in the entire State to a wireless, EMF emission filled room for the rest of their natural young lives, and condemning them to a lifetime of high frequency microwave transmitters placed squarely in their laps as the fluorescent’s ballasts buzz overhead. Your child will be flanked by 30+ other classmates in formation every day. This will take them on an endless journey into a one, or at best a list verifying two dimensional brave new world, never before dreamed of by our ancestors. Yes, this is the new frontier and according to the experts, we must take the lead. But where does it really all lead? Will it carry your child into a mental institution, an oncologist’s office, a fertility clinic, Harvard, Yale, or to nirvana? For starters, I would venture to say that the optometrist’s office is where it begins and most certainly is not where it will end.
Noteworthy symbolism in the video is clearly evident. Please enjoy the blue trust color backdrop with CUE’s symbol of RF transmission emanating from its source-the router or the wireless device in your child’s laps.
When I was in the 6th grade in 1977, my science fair project for which I received a first place ribbon was, on you guessed it, FIBER OPTICS. That was 36 years ago. Are you telling me that if fiber optic connectivity has been around that long, and that the best we can do for our children is to irradiate them with this wireless business, then Houston, we have a problem. There is something seriously wrong with this whole agenda. If you believe in technology, and we at The Fullerton Informer certainly do, then you must demand to hard wire all of the devices for network safety, security, reliability and , most importantly, for the health of the students as well as staff.
You see my friends, this is all conveniently hidden in plain view for all to see, or should I say, placed right in your face, so no one dares to disagree.
We at The Fullerton Informer will dare to educate all involved so we can put a stop to the largest radiation experiment on children that the world has ever seen. We would also like to remind all of you to be aware that those educrat bosses work for us. At the end of the day, they are still your children. Stand up for them, because from what I have seen so far, no one else will.
WHAT A MESS! WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?
It has been 30 days since I sent a mass email regarding the potential health hazards of wireless classrooms posed to students and staff to every administrative office in the entire district. It has also been over 30 days since I personally addressed and handed the Board of Trustees the information contained on this web site. As of this writing, I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ONE SINGLE EMAIL OR PHONE CALL FROM ANYONE FROM INSIDE THE FSD, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CHRIS THOMPSON, WHO BY THE WAY DOES NOT AGREE WITH ME on this issue, specifically addressing the safety concerns set forth here on this blog since this blog was launched. Astonishingly, not even my own children’s teachers have reached out to me. In the meantime, the district simply plows ahead to place these high frequency microwave transmitters in every child’s lap connected to a high powered WiFi network in every classroom. In the meantime, the usual insiders continue to vie with each other for photo ops while taking their wireless classroom dog and pony show on the road to the unsuspecting public.
In addition, there have been MULTIPLE written attempts to gain WRITTEN PERMISSION TO access to my children’s schools to take and film EMF measurements so they can be made available to the public. On May 16, 2013 that request for permission to enter, film and record EMF measurements in my children’s classrooms was OFFICIALLY DENIED IN WRITING BY THE F.S.D. SUPERINTENDENT DR. PLETKA.
I even faxed a signed WiFi non-consent form over to the junior high my son attends, and at first, and I confirmed this, that it ended up in the circular file. After a second attempt via email, it’s receipt was confirmed but now the principal will not answer my questions. She now defers me to the technology director, the same guy, who for months, has been ignoring my requests for EMF readings.
So what gives? What on earth is going on inside the FSD. Have you ever dealt with the administration on a tough issue and felt like they truly care? Sure, they give you that sweet smile, and with that soft NPR voice, tell you that they will look into it. I have it on good authority that a few articles are not going to sway the top brass either way on this issue. So there it is folks.
I never took the silent treatment and playing hard to get personally, even growing up. It always made me try harder. It worked on my wife. At first it seemed to indicate to me that the silent party simply wanted nothing to do with you, what you are selling, what you stand for, or in this case what you want them to know and look into. Playing games along those lines is all well and good on a personal level. In this case, however, it is problematic because they work for us and are entrusted with the care of our children while in their custody 160 days a year. How can they so brazenly ignore expert testimony of those on this issue, whose degrees don’t even register on the district’s thermometers, that has been so clearly set forth in their laps? Ironically, the battle clearly rages on with our neighbors to the north in the LAUSD with regard to this very issue. It is no secret that the UTLA, the teachers union up there, wants no part of this radiation experiment either. Our own teachers union in town, well………
In my opinion, THE PUBLIC TRUST AND THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT are on the road to becoming mutually exclusive terms in the local vernacular.
The health of 15,000 children is potentially on the line and they don’t even give us the time of day. What else would you expect in a school district whose motto is “learning for a lifetime”. Quite possibly, it could very well be that they know it will take them that long to figure out that what they are doing could be so egregiously wrong. Stay tuned.
On Monday April 15, 2013, The Fullerton Informer met personally to discuss the dangers of wireless classrooms with the Superintendent of the Fullerton Joint Union High School District as well as the Director of Administrative Services. The following evening, April 16, 2013, this information was then presented to The Board of Trustees, senior administrators, and all of the principals of The FJUHSD at their regular board meeting.
THIS IS ONLY A TEST. Normal programming will resume shortly or sooner if we receive a response with regards to The FJUHSD’s plans to address the potential dangers of the wireless classrooms that are popping up in Fullerton’s Schools like mushrooms after a heavy deluge. In the meantime, the consensus builds to halt the wireless classroom expansions.
Will the resistance to the mounting scientific evidence of the potential dangers to our children begin to amass as well? You bet. It is a trillion dollar industry and each year the kids will comprise the endless supply of new clients. To the purveyors of this technology, it is a religion. They are evangelists. We at The Fullerton Informer will continue to preach the other side of the story that you have not been told. Is it possible that these administrators have never heard of this information before? Perhaps. What they now will do with it will be the subject of much further discussion. Stay tuned- and don’t touch that dial.
Please look at our Facebook page. http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Fullerton-Informer/606854526009581?ref=stream
Arrow down a few inches and have a look at the proposed real world classroom application of wireless technology in action. This photo truly puts it into perspective. I remember growing up where there were ashtrays everywhere and now I see the poor folks on oxygen. And then there are those who sadly checked out way too early from an insidious in-your-face out of control marketing strategy that went unchallenged for way too long. Yes, they were lied to in the most egregious manner. So this begs the question: Does this child know what this is doing to him? Do his parents?
By the way, hook up an earpiece to any WiFi enabled laptop or tablet and guess what? You get a 300% plus increase in the level of EMF emissions as the wire acts as an antenna. What is in the speaker in the child’s ear? The speaker contains a small magnet and a coil which takes it up another couple of notches, and you guessed it, right to the child’s head special delivery. Low intensity is safe you say?
We won’t even get into the children’s orthodontic fixtures at this time. They all come complete with that necessary metallic alloy array that is required for reception. Ok, just a little aside, I digress. Those industrial WiFi systems which already are, or will be installed in the FSD, will STAY ON ALL DAY in the classrooms. They have plenty of power to spare. They go right through wire mesh and concrete unlike those cheap ones you have at home. It’s just what the doctor ordered. Remember, the electrical conductivity of the human body can act as an antenna. Keep in mind that this is all courtesy of what you thought would help your child’s smile but mostly because of what you are being told by the experts that the child needs to learn and can no longer live without.
READ THESE STATEMENTS FROM A PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGIST FROM HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND OTHER EXPERTS.
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO.
WE ARE NOT MAKING THIS STUFF UP-YOU AS PARENTS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT THE DISTRICT IS NOT TELLING YOU.
On Saturday, March 23rd, I was peacefully handing out literature with my daughter for this website to parents in waiting cars and on foot on the sidewalk at Acacia Elementary School-recently rated the number one elementary school in Orange County by the O.C. Register. THIS IS GROUND ZERO FOR THE DISTRICT WIDE ROLL OUT OF WIRELESS CLASSROOMS IN THE FSD. The information was well received by all except for one parent who I respectfully thanked for his honesty. When all of the parents had left, I entered the school grounds and approached a familiar group that was curiously watching me that consisted of the principal, several of my children’s teachers, and a non-school district employee who happens to be the foundation president. I walked up to them and politely handed them a reprint on the blog stories. Before I handed them the flyer, I stated that I would like to formally present each of you with this information. I handed it to each of them and they willingly accepted it. The principal then looked at the information with what appeared to be astonishment and handed it back to me. She told me that I cannot hand out this information on school property. The principal then ordered her employees and the one non-employee to return the information to me, which they all did, except for one teacher. Were they under any obligation to return the material to me? The foundation president not being an employee certainly was not and the teachers who, clearly all knew who I was, were not really either. It was a matter of personal choice. I was simply formally putting school personnel on notice that there is a possible danger on campus that they and the students are all being exposed to. I then remarked that I will go back to the sidewalk with my daughter, and we did.
Subsequently, I emailed this information to the principal and politely asked her to forward this information to her staff. After several days, I asked her if she forwarded this information to her staff and she said that she did not. Was the principal within her rights on Saturday? Was I? Legally it could be pretty dicey. However, one could easily argue that in the context of how they were approached as well as how the event unfolded, it could go both ways. I was not passing out obscene material. I have seen far more questionable material come home with my children like repeated advertisements to a local bar, and the freaky book catalogue that the school peddles for fundraising. I digress. The principal knows who I am and I believe has known about this blog and this information for some time as she was one my first points of contact with regards to this issue. The foundation president clearly knows who I am as she lives next door to me. Also, I announced this information at the most recent Board of Trustees meeting on March 12. By the way, with the exception of ONE elected representative, since the board meeting and the 3-25-13 mass emailing to EVERY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE in the entire district, not one employee from all 20 campuses in the entire district has reached out to me at all. No questions, no comments, no responses like “thank you for your email”, no “we will look into this”, nothing, nada, zip. By the way, every one of those teachers present at that little huddle has had, or continues to have direct contact with my children at this school.
I personally like technology as long as the benefit is not eclipsed by the risks. Hardwired devices are really the only safe alternative and that is all we want to make evidently clear to all involved. Mastery of the technology by our children can be equally accomplished both safely and effectively with hard wiring. Sounds simple enough doesn’t it?
So what are all these people at the district afraid of? Is this information dangerous? I believe that it is. I believe that this information represents a perspective that the industry and the administrators NEVER told you about and sure looks like they don’t want you to know about. It gets in the way of what the industry, with the help of local school administrators, have planned for YOUR CHILDREN-turning them into lifetime customers at a very young age. These corporations have been dangling carrots in front of the administrators for years with goodies and strings attached. I wish these devices had strings instead of antennae. Perhaps, if you knew about the possible dangers, you would say no and thwart the industry’s insidious marketing strategy which aims to place these high frequency microwave transmitters squarely in every school age child’s lap in the entire country- in direct proximity to their sensitive, developing reproductive areas. No Joe, scientists say it is safe you say? Guess what? There are just as many scientists that say that it is not. See all the prior posts and links on this site. So why then, when they are your kids, at a school paid for with your tax money, staffed by people paid for with your tax money, is there not FULL DISCLOSURE of the potential dangers of this technology? What is with the silent treatment? They tell you when they spray the Monsanto “Roundup” on the grass. Why is that? Did your tech night handouts mention any risks associated with these wireless laptops or tablets in your kids laps for 6-8 hours a day? Why didn’t cigarettes have warning labels for decades? Great questions. This technologically intrusive blind leap is problematic on many fronts. Quite a Saturday morning, to say the least, and one rife with unteachable lessons from a school district where “learning for a lifetime” is ironically embossed on all the district’s vehicles.
Maybe the pledge of allegiance recited every morning needs to have a more in depth study undertaken by all certificated personnel. In the meantime, we will simply go back to the sidewalk with our side of the story that you all have a right to know. In addition, we will continue to make it explicitly clear that we will not supply our children as the test subjects for, what I believe, is about to become the largest radiation experiment on children in human history. We also hope after you get your hands on this forbidden information, that you won’t either.
ON 3-25-13, THIS INFORMATION WAS DELIVERED TO EVERY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE WITHIN THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT. Did we miss anyone? OH YES, THE PARENTS…
From: joe imbriano <email@example.com>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:56:42 -0700
Subject: the dangers of wireless classrooms
Good morning. I would like to introduce myself to all of you. My name is Joe Imbriano. I am a Fullerton resident and a parent of three, soon to be four students in the Fullerton School District. I am the site administrator of The Fullerton Informer blog, which at this time, is dedicated to raising awareness of the dangers of wireless technology in the classroom. This information was informally presented at the Board of Trustees meeting on 3-12-13.
There is an old saying that goes something like “what you don’t know can’t hurt you”. There is another adage that goes along the lines of ”what you can’t see can’t hurt you”.
We at the Fullerton Informer beg to differ and will strive to provide you with ample opportunity to really begin to question what you may never have pondered questioning before. Welcome my friends. It is our personal desire for all of you who visit here to enter and ride along with an open mind. Enjoy the view, come back soon and most importantly-tell a loved one or a friend. Join the dialogue and comment. Don’t be afraid to ask questions or to throw your two cents in. In return we will tackle the issues, raise eyebrows, and step on a few toes. Ultimately at the end of the day, the light of day will shine on the issues for all to make informed decisions and form opinions based on a balanced approach.
I personally guarantee that the information presented here and the unconventional perspectives that we at The Fullerton Informer will dare to bring to light will make you think twice and in doing so will make us all the wiser as we walk the long and winding road. May access to truth never be in short supply in our hometown or in your neighborhood wherever you may be.
While it is true that what you don’t know CAN hurt you and what you can’t see WILL hurt you if you are not paying attention, just remember that the truth will stand on its own and the truth will truly set you free. Seek it at all costs…….
March 5 , 2013
WHAT’S IN A NUMBER? 2.4 GHZ-The most dangerous frequency-ideal for cooking food and running a chemical reaction. Just perfect for WiFi, wireless tablets and laptops and wireless classrooms. Why? Because the FCC DOESN’T REQUIRE A LICENSE AT THIS FREQUENCY!
They told us cigarettes were safe and thalidomide was good. The experts never seem to learn. They are the gift that keeps on giving. They continue to bequeath us with drugs like Epilim and Phen-Phen, things like cases of Diet Joke stacked to the ceilings in all the pharmacies and all of the other dangerous petrochemical poison that will land you on the pharmaceutical industry’s fly paper if you are not paying attention. Folks, 20-20 hindsight and a quarter won’t even get you a cup of coffee today and that is why we cannot rely on it. When the damage is done, it is done. It is then too late.
2.45 GHz IS A MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC FREQUENCY. Do we have the making of an experiment on our hands? Do we have willing subjects? Do we have a laboratory? Do we have informed consent? It appears that quite possibly, unbeknownst to many of us, that we do. This particular frequency of the electromagnetic spectrum is commonly employed in laboratories and medicine. It is used to move chemical reactions along, anneal, synthesize and polymerize compounds, and among other things, to destroy tissue.
Columbia University actually owns a patent for taking DNA that responds to the EMF and transferring it to another piece of DNA, which can be turned on. It has been shown that this piece of DNA can be used as an electromagnetic trigger. A trigger for what? With 75,000 miles of circulatory system in the incredible machine called the human body, there are a lot of variables. Both the thermal and non thermal EMF actions elicit responses in DNA and DNA picks up all kinds of frequencies. The nucleic structure of DNA is an incredible fractal antenna on a molecular scale. The six foot double helix molecule crammed into less than a one micron space is coiled and coiled and coiled many times over. This DNA response to the EMF emissions’ phenomenon is observed at the very lowest power levels in the 2.45 GHz frequency range. Talk about reception and gain!
Fullerton’s classroom WiFi routers and the WiFi enabled wireless devices all utilize a pulsed high frequency microwave emission at 2.45 GHz. It just so happens that maximum dielectric loss of water molecules, the essence of life, begins at 2.45 GHz and it is taking place right in your child’s lap where the essence of your grandchildren will begin.
This is also the same frequency that your microwave oven operates on, however, with the WiFi, the data is sent in ‘packets’ or ‘pulses’ along the waves.
It is this ‘pulse’ and the resulting square waves that many scientists contend is one of several properties of this particular form of microwave radiation that is responsible for the mechanism for adverse health effects that are being reported in the scientific literature.
Although the intensity is supposedly perceived as ‘low’, wireless classroom levels can potentially be trillions of times above the natural background levels in that part of the electromagnetic spectrum. The resulting high frequency pulsed square waves that these tablets and laptops emanate are a man made freak of nature, and are being emitted right in your child’s lap. Is this a coincidence or is it by design? Is this being foisted on an unsuspecting populace as part of a larger clandestine attempt to effect fertility? I believe that it is.
The current ISM standards were established in 1985 when this application of the technology was unthinkable. They rolled WiFi out in 1997 with NO SAFETY TESTING. Even more compelling is that the current ICNIRP guidelines are intended to protect in the very short term against gross heating effects-in other words “does it burn” from short term exposures. In addition to the aforementioned, the long term non-thermal effects and the pulsed square waves are where the additional, in my opinion, far more serious concerns lie. Studies have been undertaken at length confirming that non- thermal dangers are real. There are NO studies to date, that I am aware of, on the long term non-thermal dangers or biological effects associated with the exposures to the levels and intensity of high frequency pulsed non-ionizing microwave radiation in the wireless classroom settings- similar to what some of the Fullerton School District’s children are already being exposed to.
Will the Fullerton School District and its Board of Trustees allow the expansion of this technology to continue unabated, in what I believe to be, the complete absence of concrete and conclusive evidence that this technology is safe in its proposed classroom setting applications? REMEMBER, THESE DEVICES EMIT IN DIRECT PROXIMITY TO THE SENSITIVE DEVELOPING REPRODUCTIVE AREAS OF OUR CHILDREN -RIGHT IN THEIR LAPS. WOULD YOU PUT YOUR CELL PHONE IN YOUR LAP ALL DAY AND TALK ON IT?
I find it odd that the principal of my child’s school uses a hardwired device on their desk. If it works in the office, why can it not work in the classroom? I wonder why what is good for the goose isn’t good for the gander?
I urge all of you to please take the time to educate yourself and read up on the science which is I believe is largely being ignored by the main stream media and the Fullerton School District. The evidence for potential harm predates even many of us.
For those of you who need a PLAIN ENGLISH TRANSLATION-THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THIS STUFF REALLY DOES TO THE KIDS-I for one don’t feel like sitting around for 10 years to find out and neither should you. The technology should be HARDWIRED in ALL of the classroom settings and that will eliminate the danger to our children. Today’s kids already have the odds stacked against them. Let’s not help the house on this one.
ON MARCH 12, 2013 THE DANGERS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION IN WIRELESS CLASSROOMS WERE INFORMALLY PRESENTED TO THE FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT’S BOARD OF TRUSTEES AT THEIR BI-MONTHLY MEETING
Unlike ionizing radiation, microwaves cause molecules with electric dipoles (like water) to rotate in response to the field oscillation. The friction that this generates with the other molecules creates heat. DNA is an electrically charged molecule, so microwaving it will shake it up. If it gets damaged by the shaking, then you’ve mutated it. Structural isomerism is another result of microwave exposure and has deleterious effects in living systems.
There is also evidence that acentric fragmentation takes place via a non thermal mechanism which is known to produce deleterious effects in living systems as well.
Will the district look into the evidence supporting that the risks of RF technology are real? Will they allow themselves to become cognizant of the fact that there is a complete absence of research and long term studies on the safety of this technology’s proposed applications in the classroom setting? There is a total vacuum of empirical evidence in the scientific literature regarding the SAFETY of wireless classrooms and a virtual non-existence of studies replicating the proposed classroom setting’s duration of exposure to the developing young children and the intensity of the non-ionizing microwave emissions coming from these wireless devices that the children are being exposed to. There is, however, a plethora of studies that suggest exposure well below the FCC guidelines has deleterious affects.
Will the administration and trustees weigh in on whether or not the potential dangers to human health eclipse the convenience or will the expansion of the district’s wireless classrooms simply continue unabated? We will keep you posted as soon as we hear from them.
We at The Fullerton Informer will now move to agendize this topic at a subsequent board meeting so as to to enter the debate into the public record.
We welcome any comment from the district’s personnel or it’s Board of Trustees in the comments section of this blog to have a public discourse on this topic. May I respectfully remind everyone that the Fullerton School District and its employees have a duty and a responsibility to provide a SAFE learning environment, a SAFE working environment and, at the end of the day, they ultimately all work for US which includes the children, their parents and all the taxpayers. We all have a stake in this and we owe it to the children and the future generations for all of us to do our due diligence. None of us can afford to walk around with eyes wide shut on something that is simply glaring us in the face.
UTLA moves forward in the right direction. Here is an excerpt from the motion:
“I move that UTLA will abide by current National NEA Policy for Environmentally Safe Schools which states Read the rest of this entry »
THE BIOINITIATIVE REPORT:There are two sides to any debate. Could the school districts be wrong? You be the judge. After all they are YOUR children.
Was this information disseminated at the school’s technology meeting? Was there a discussion about the safety of our children? I don’t believe it was mentioned. Why is there such a push to go wireless? Are textbooks really that dangerous?
Is this really a safe alternative to the printed word? Is there a safer alternative? Of course there is. It is called the ethernet cable. There is just one problem however-TABLETS DON’T HAVE A PLUG!
Find out for yourself here. Section 18 is of particular interest considering these devices spend most of their time emitting right in our children’s laps.
The informed consent can no longer be consent.
Put YOUR school on notice. It is your right.
WE ARE NOT ALONE in our mission to warn and inform parents and educators about the potential dangers our children face with the advent of this technology.
The case builds for the only safe option-the hardwired connection. See for yourself. Don’t be afraid to ask the tough questions.
LAUSD GOING WIRELESS to the tune of $500 million for 600,000 students to go 1:1 with wireless tablets-IS OUR OWN FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NEXT? WILL OUR KIDS BE THE CANARIES IN THE COAL MINE?
Will Fullerton’s students be next? What will we know after a decade? Can we afford to take that chance? The tech giants are going forward with a full court press right onto our childrens’ laps. Will it lead our kids into more than just the optometrist’s office someday? Do we dare say no to this? I dare say that we do.