UTLA moves forward in the right direction. Here is an excerpt from the motion:

“I move that UTLA will abide by current National NEA Policy for Environmentally Safe Schools which states that all employees and stakeholders should be informed when there are changes in their exposure to environmental hazards including electromagnetic radiation and that all stakeholders and the public should be notified of any actual and potential hazards. UTLA will advocate for technological solutions that maintain technology upgrades while not increasing employees exposure to electromagnetic radiation.”


  1. #1 by Anonymous on March 9, 2013 - 8:09 pm

    Push back in LA? Wow. Heavy hitters involved.

  2. #2 by latchkey kid on March 10, 2013 - 5:30 pm

    Where are all the parents in LAUSD? What the heck?

    • #3 by Joe Imbriano on March 10, 2013 - 9:46 pm

      There are plenty of upset parents but the district and School Board REFUSE to listen to the parents and their concerns, virtually ignores all of the credible evidence that points to the dangers of this technology that has been clearly presented, and just plows right ahead with the agenda. It makes you wonder what is really behind this wireless stuff. They are so brazen that the union is having to get involved.

  3. #4 by shane smith on March 14, 2013 - 10:32 am

    Very interesting! LA teacher’s union should be applauded for questioning the safety of wifi exposure….question is…..will the Board listen, or just cram wifi down our throats? We need honest reasearch to give us the information necessary to make a decision.

  4. #5 by Reece on April 4, 2013 - 5:57 am

    Greetings from Ohio! I’m shocked at how quickly everyone is embracing this whole wireless thing. There is a tremendous amount of science that is being ignored. Your blog is on the radar in Southern Ohio along with the wifinschools site which is a great resource. Great work thanks to all of you.

    • #6 by Joe Imbriano on April 12, 2013 - 11:31 am

      Thank you for your post. This problem is nationwide. The information is there for the taking for those willing to do their homework. The other side to this debate is garnering more and more attention. Please do your part and spread the word.

  5. #7 by shoes on April 12, 2013 - 11:11 am

    A diplomat is a man who always remembers a woman’s birthday but never remembers her age.

  6. #8 by Anonymous on April 17, 2013 - 1:52 am

    Wow, the union and the board are at odds over this in LA?

    That is amazing.

  7. #9 by the oracle on October 26, 2013 - 12:08 pm

    Fullerton School District teachers, are you awake? I see you voraciously picketing for your pocketbooks, packing board meetings for your purses, wailing for your wallets, bantering for you benefits, but you are abdicating your responsibilities with your arrogance. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

    Mr. Imbriano has gone to great lengths to disseminate this information. The evidence has been placed in your face there but apparently you all just do whatever you are told. Where is your line in the sand? Do you people have a conscience?

    • #10 by Anonymous on October 26, 2013 - 10:02 pm

      The irony of it all is that these teachers are part of this huge irradiation experiment, too. Apparently, their health and lives or their students’ health does not warrant them standing up and telling FSD “NO.”

      Teachers: what won’t you do for your job and to stay in favor with your bosses?

    • #11 by Joe Imbriano on October 26, 2013 - 10:39 pm

      Just look them in the eye and you will have your answer.

  8. #12 by Anonymous on October 28, 2013 - 1:20 pm

    How can the people of Fullerton allow this to be done to their children? How can the teachers be so blind? Is it by choice? I am no scientist but there certainly needs to be some caution involved in making this decision.

Comments are closed.

Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved. is the legal copyright holder of the material on this blog and it may not be used, reprinted, or published without express written permission. The information contained in this website is for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY. This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. Readers will not be put on spam lists. We will not sell your contact information to another company. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of our advertisers or blog commenters. We reserve the right to change the focus of this blog, to shut it down, to sell it, or to change the terms of use at our discretion. We are not responsible for the actions of our advertisers or sponsors. If a reader purchases a product or service based upon a link from our blog, the reader must take action with that company to resolve the issue, not us. Our policy on using letters or emails that have been written directly to us is as follows: We will be sharing those letters and emails with the blogging audience unless they are requested to be kept confidential. We will claim ownership of those letters or emails to later be used in an up-and-coming book,blog article,post or column, unless otherwise specified by the writer to keep ownership. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!