The Fullerton Informer got a load of the 21st century learning’s Trojan horse microwave matrix common core sales pitch over at the Fullerton library the other night. Dr. George Giokaris and Dr. Bob Pletka both tried to serve it straight up on the rocks. All this talk about reinventing the public educational wheel that has failed this country beyond description over the course of the last 40 years or so really got me to thinking. Have the terms privacy, critical thinking and education become mutually exclusive? I believe that it sure looks that way folks as described in the following well written O.C. Register article:
DATA MINING KIDS CROSSES THE LINE
Just you wait until the real journaling starts on those microwave transmitters coming to your children’s laps. Perhaps at your school, it is already happening. No matter how you slice it, it comes up lose lose for the children and now even the parents. As for me and mine, well, we ain’t buyin’ it. The snake oil needs to stay in the bottle and the buffalo chips need to head back out to the pasture. As far as crossing the line, well irradiating young children all day long just so the brainwashing can continue and the algorithms and the dossiers can be compiled crosses ’em all ladies and gentlemen.
#1 by amateur night on September 26, 2013 - 7:51 pm
These cats ain’t got the kids’backs while the parents are lookin’ the other way just because Simon says. The beat just goes on.
#2 by Anonymous on September 27, 2013 - 8:01 am
This is illegal. There are laws that protect children’s and families’ privacy. How can this be going on?
#3 by Schulzee on September 28, 2013 - 3:10 pm
I again implore you, if you believe it is at all harmful, that you remove your children from that environment. I fear that hypocrisy often undermines credibility.
#4 by Anonymous on September 28, 2013 - 8:54 pm
Are you the one that works for Apple?
#5 by Anonymous on September 29, 2013 - 7:56 am
He’s the one with the agenda to irradiate the kids for the sake of wireless technology. Maybe he does work for Apple. It’s hard to understand such an aggressive drive to push this on everyone’s kids without a motivation.
#6 by amateur night on September 29, 2013 - 9:48 am
This cat thinks this it’s still last year’s rodeo.
#7 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 5:54 pm
Yup, last years, the year before that, the year before that, and before that too. I keep reading more data and keep coming up with the same conclusion. Well, there’s always next year.
#8 by Joe Imbriano on September 29, 2013 - 9:31 am
I couldn’t agree with you more. You just have it totally backwards. We need remove the harmful environment from the children Roman, and that is exactly what we intend to do. You clearly wish it to remain in place for what reason, I simply fail to understand.
#9 by Schulzee on September 29, 2013 - 9:13 pm
It’s just incongruent with my approach. For instance, if I am concerned about the level of arsenic in the tap water, the first thing I would do is stop drinking it, like now (and my family too). Only then would I bother to go to the water district, write the city council, start a web-page, hand out book marks, etc. And I would show up with a bottle of Evian, not drinking from a bottle labeled “Fullerton Tap Water”. It just seems counter intuitive to me to just keep drinking the water while waiting for the city council to fix the problem.
You and I do not have the power to take the Wi-Fi out of the classroom tomorrow but we do have the power to take our kids out of the classroom right now. If I was concerned about the Wi-Fi even half as much as you are I would have taken steps to eliminate as much exposure as possible… at the beginning of last year.
That, and to be honest, I’m getting tired of shrugging my shoulders when other parents ask me “If he’s so worried about it why does he still send his kids here every day?” At this point I just have to shrug and say that “He’s obviously not that worried about it” because the alternative, implying somebody would purposefully put their children in harms way, is unthinkable.
#10 by mom1 on September 29, 2013 - 9:50 pm
You are taking such an active role in making certain that the kids are irradiated.
#11 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 5:50 pm
Every time you turn on a light you are doing the same. We are all guilty.
#12 by mom1 on October 3, 2013 - 8:32 pm
Why so mean and bitter, Schulzee?
Haven’t convinced enough parents that irradiating their children for the sake of technology is a good thing?
#13 by Joe Imbriano on October 3, 2013 - 11:29 pm
60 Hz incandescent emissions in the visible spectrum at 2700k is not the same as 10 microwatts per cm2 at 2.45 GHz. Apples and aircraft carriers Roman. You know better.Keep the conversation genuine. Remain here to offer truth not deliberate obfuscation to the unsuspecting. The kids and the parents deserve better.
#14 by Anonymous on September 29, 2013 - 9:52 pm
moral and ethical compass broken Schulzee?
#15 by Ray on September 30, 2013 - 7:25 am
Schulze,
As a medical doctor, why is it that you continue to ignore all scientific evidence that reports biological and health effects from microwave radiation?
You are trying to dodge the science, and that is unacceptable.
If you want to have a discussion here about this subject, you are going to need to be accountable.
You said that you didn’t want to change topics, and that you wanted to get to the bottom of the issue of RF radiation and cancer.
So do your end of it and read the research that has been put in front of you.
http://www.national-toxic-encephalopathy-foundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Biological_and_Health_Effects_of_Microwave_Radio_Frequency_Transmissions.pdf
#16 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 5:38 pm
Ray
As a lay person, why is it that you continue to ignore all scientific evidence that disputes the biological and health effects from microwave radiation?
You are trying to dodge the science, and that is unacceptable.
If you want to have a discussion here about this subject, you are going to need to be accountable.
You said that you didn’t want me to change topics, and that you wanted me to get to the bottom of the issue of RF radiation and cancer.
So do your end of it and read the research that has been put in front of you.
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/31625/InTech-Evaluations_of_international_expert_group_reports_on_the_biological_effects_of_radiofrequency_fields.pdf
#17 by Joe Imbriano on October 3, 2013 - 11:04 pm
Roman I understand the level of denial prevalent among most, but you are exhibiting a clinical form the likes of which borders on having some sort of an agenda. My agenda is out in the open and has been from day 1.
Can you admit or come to grips with the fact that there is a distinct possibility that children are being harmed by this technology by design to impact human fertility?
I firmly believe this to be the case. You can throw Forbes magazine articles at me with a sick joke Steve Jobs thought for the day staring me in the face on the front page if you wish. I don’t take the bait from the spin masters. I am not a list verifier. I am a free thinker with 2 open eyes in a world where most are glossed over with booze, toxic chemical sweeteners, sugar, injections, trans fats, pills, dope, mindless nonsense diversions, porn, propaganda and flat out lies that insult the intelligence of those whose last vestiges of such dangle by a mere thread.
Roman, you appear to be a very intelligent man, and I have to wonder how your objectivity has been eviscerated by your innate desire to conform to mainstream science, media and academia when all they do at the highest levels is cleverly betray humanity on a daily basis. The microwave towers and transmitters are now almost everywhere including the classrooms all over the United States. They will soon be blaming all of the health effects from this microwave bombardment all on Fukushima’s ionizing fallout which at most has doubled background levels on days where the jet stream carries it our way. Microwave emissions from the antenna arrays at or approaching the resonance frequency of water raise background levels to a trillion times the historical norms. The red herring of the disaster in Japan will take the fall, the wireless industry will get the pass and the children will get far more than just the shaft all as a result of the cowardice of those who could have stopped it but chose to close their eyes, cover their ears like some at the board meeting, play it safe with their fair weather friends for a popularity contest, and fall in line with the demands of their public employers with their utmost allegiance to their fleeting reputations, empty accolades, careers, paychecks and pensions. Tell me, in retrospect, will it really have been worth it?
Break your conditioning.
#18 by Anonymous on October 3, 2013 - 9:43 pm
Most M.D.’s are extremely closed minded when it comes to issues or thought that deviate from the mainstream. They are bred and groomed to end up that way. This individuals behavior is not the least bit surprising to be frank with you. It has become all too common throughout the medical field.
I believe I have read references to a “list verifier” mentality previously alluded to here on this site. That is precisely what you have on your hands here.
#19 by Anonymous on September 30, 2013 - 9:39 am
Speaking to parents as you are, it seems as though you are working to ostracize Mr. Imbriano’s children at the Acacia School. We all know that parents talk and ideas such as you are promulgating reach the children and then those ideas manifest themselves in the children’s actions toward one another. Are you stirring the pot, Mr. Schulze? Do you realize your role and how hurtful it is to innocent children?
Please stop.
#20 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 5:08 pm
Well, I’m pretty sure I have not talked to anybody about any body’s children. I have however been asked by parents why, if someone is so concerned about EMF, would they keep sending their children into that environment. I honestly don’t know how to answer that and maybe you can help. I can’t help but put myself in that place where my child asks me: “Daddy, you said this water is poisonous, why do you keep making me drink it?”
I’m going to guess (hope) that a parent who is very concerned about EMF is not going to allow their kids to use the iPads. Since I think that in some classes every kid uses an iPad, the ones who don’t are going to have to explain to the rest of the class why they are not. If they are honest it’s going to scare a lot of the kids or at the very least make them bring questions to their parents. I’m just not sure how hurtful this is to our innocent children.
I happen to think that Joe has chosen an excellent school to transfer his kid(s) into, for what it’s worth.
#21 by Anonymous on October 3, 2013 - 7:10 pm
Infantile.
#22 by amateur night on October 3, 2013 - 10:19 pm
“If they are honest it’s going to scare a lot of the kids or at the very least make them bring questions to their parents. I’m just not sure how hurtful this is to our innocent children.” Schulzeepoo
We dont want to have the parents have to deal with the flyers +the bookmarks+the gossip. We want it to be like disneyland over at acacia. Whoa man its already over the top with joe showin up at the FSD board and fullerton city council meetings and now parents have to engage THEIR KIDS AS THEY GET SCARED BECAUSE ANOTHER KID WONT TOUCH AN IPAD. That would mean the state of their denial would actually require some more effort to keep it rollin. We just cant let this happen.
Boy that would mean that maybe Pletka was wrong when he said it was totally safe? Poor innocent children. Such a good thing we have our little schulzeepoo to protect the little innocents from having a discussion with their parents about the the boogie man in the ipad. I can feel the fluff from schulzeepoos love. Dude you are gettin’ soft on us man.
#23 by geometry major on September 30, 2013 - 11:58 am
Incongruent?
“At this point I just have to shrug and say that “He’s obviously not that worried about it” because the alternative, implying somebody would purposefully put their children in harms way, is unthinkable.”
Roman, you wouldn’t happen to be talking about Robert Pletka with 14,000 FSD students would ya’? You guys need to keep your eyes on the ball.
#24 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 4:44 pm
Nope, I was talking about Joe, or any parent that exposes their children to something they believe to be harmful. I admit I don’t understand this mindset but I’m willing to try.
#25 by Joe Imbriano on October 3, 2013 - 11:33 pm
That is precisely why my attempts to stop the radiation experiment on all of the children continues unabated in spite of the worst of intentions of the FSD administrators. What is your email? I will send you a copy of Pletka’s motherlode letter he sent me today. I couldn’t have asked for a more concise elucidation of their position and intentions.
#26 by Anonymous on September 30, 2013 - 8:41 am
Is “Schulzee” the Pied Piper of FSD, trying so hard to convince his “followers” that the argument is between FSD and Joe Imbriano?
It appears that he is using that as a major distraction. Why doesn’t Schulze call up all of the medical doctors, scientists and researchers and pick that bone with them? They are who his argument is with.
Why doesn’t Schulze pick up the phone and tell them that all of their letters to LAUSD telling the schools to hard wire the technology is baloney? Isn’t that, in effect, what Schulze is telling all of the Acacia parents who will listen? Isn’t he saying to parents that all of these experts’ are wrong and that he, Schulze, is right? The experts are all saying to hard wire the technology; Schulze is saying it is not a “concern.”
Go ahead, Schulze, contact these experts and start telling them that they are all wrong:
Dr. Martha Herbert, Harvard Medical School, Transcend Phone: 617-966-9766
Martin Blank, PhD, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, (212) 305-3644
Dr. Magda Havas, Trent University, Canada Phone: 705 748-1011 ext 7882
American Academy of Environmental Medicine: (316) 684-5500
Amy Dean, D.O.
Dr. Doris Rapp
Dr. Jennifer Armstrong
Dr. Allan Lieberman
Olle Johasson, Ph.D., Karonlinska Institute, Stockholm, Department of Neuroscience Phone 468-52 48 70 58
and many more . . . .
It’s time you put up or shut up, Schulze.
#27 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 5:28 pm
I’m flattered you think that I have followers, thanks. I’m really not trying to convince anybody just like I don’t try to turn invisible. I hope to educate people so they can make informed decisions for themselves. I don’t find the need to hand out flyers, send emails, or speak out at board meetings to do this. Yet, I do feel that posting here may be of value, but maybe not.
I’m willing to call those people you listed but we will need to record the conversations and have the assurance they will be posted here unedited. I assume I will be accused of editing the conversations myself so perhaps we can Skype a few people in to avoid that. But most importantly you will have to agree to call a list of my experts and talk to them and tell them that they are wrong. And we’ll post those too. I’m also not interested in calling a bunch of people and doing this to have you then not do your part. So let’s do one at a time, I’ll even go first, then you, and so on.
I’ll let you hammer out the details, who should I call first?
I believe, as someone once said, “it’s time to put up or shut up.”
#28 by Anonymous on October 3, 2013 - 7:05 pm
It’s you that has an argument with the experts, so have at it Schulze. Put up or shut up.
Start with Dr. Herbert. Once again, your argument is with them, so go argue.
#29 by Anonymous on October 3, 2013 - 9:09 pm
God help those people you “educate.”
Oh, that’s right, atheists don’t believe in God.
#30 by Schulzee on October 3, 2013 - 5:48 pm
Because the teachers seem to find it a valuable tool in, and out of the classroom.
I understand that you want to remove that “harmful” environment from the children but it may never happen, at the least it’s going to take a long time. In the mean time the precautionary principal would guide us to remove our children from any perceived harms way as soon as possible. Wouldn’t it???
#31 by Australia--Principal Resigns on September 29, 2013 - 2:24 pm
On whose behalf do you “implore”? Do you represent the Fullerton School District? What role do you have to “implore”?
#32 by Schulzee on September 29, 2013 - 8:47 pm
None.
#33 by amateur night on October 3, 2013 - 9:16 pm
He just likes to be in with the in crowd. He thinks he is still in High School.
#34 by Wheels coming off Common Core? on September 29, 2013 - 8:57 am
http://www.cato.org/blog/wheels-coming-common-core-lets-debate
#35 by the oracle on October 9, 2013 - 2:53 pm
Oh how right you are:
http://nypost.com/2013/10/08/us-adults-are-dumber-than-the-average-human/
Everyone needs a wireless device. Even the guy picking the vegetables in the fields.
You see the highly skilled workforce will save us from all of the jobs that our treasonous trade deals have shipped overseas that are never coming back.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from all of the layoffs due to robotics, automation and technological advances.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from the ever expanding national debt that is never ever going to be paid back based on the way our currency is issued.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from all of the low cost highly skilled labor being brought in from all over the world under the H-1B visa programs that are taking the skilled jobs from highly skilled college grads with six figure tuition debt.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from the Pan American Union and the soon to be open borders flooding the US with dirt cheap labor.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from our civic responsibilities by simply allowing us and our children to abdicate them by obeying the glowing blue screens everywhere. This insures unfettered continuity of present and future government trade and economic policies that have bestowed the looming bankruptcy proceedings upon this nation.
The highly skilled work force will save us from having to think critically. All thought will be relegated to a voice on a tablet in a two dimensional list verification method yielding a pre-determined result.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from the dwindling number of jobs that are already taken by normal people who don’t need to be highly skilled.
You see the highly skilled workforce will save us from our civic responsibilities by simply complying with the masters’ edicts coming from the glowing blue screens.
You see the highly skilled work force will save us from just about everything including the fact that we won’t be needing all of these people very soon by the highly skilled work force not being able to have any kids of their own due the EMF exposure to their reproductive areas while getting their 21st Century learning in a wireless classroom environment under their belts to become that highly skilled work force.
The highly skilled work force.
#36 by Wake up!! on October 19, 2013 - 11:13 am
Top public schools demand more than Common Core
http://watchdog.org/111120/top-public-schools-demand-more-than-common-core-2/
Some schools are performing well.